Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Just wondering if anyone knows more about the half finished garden behind the Sainsbury on LL?

We live very near and have been told today that the two small structures in the garden will be toilets.

Not very keen on public loos right where we eat and play!

Is this right? Anyone know more?

thanks in advance

Hi!

Yes I can help! One of the little buildings will be a potting shed for garden things and the other will be a toilet you're right. It is a provate block though so will only be used by the residents in the flats there, it's not going to be a public toilet don't worry!

Also the chances of any of the residents using it is slim as there are toilets inside the flats which begs the question why bother, but think it was just for ease if it was a lovely hot day and residents were having a bbq they could use the toilet there rather than go back inside flat.


Hope thats cleared it up..they certainly wont be smelly as they will be maintained and also the chances of it being finished any time soon are slim!

@ Higgles...

...

Firstly, yes you are correct that only one shed will be a toilet and the other a potting shed. But may I refer to your last comment in which you suggest the sheds will not be completed any time soon. Well, I am a little offended by that and would like to stand up for my landlord. You see we here have a fantastic landlord, not only is he polite, well mannored and quite dashing, he is also a man of his word. When ever we call with a request it is happily completed before we even call. Actually he is so on time and punctual that I would even put money down on him being born premature. So if he suggests the garden will be completed soon, I have no doubt it will be. Hurrah for landlords.


Higgles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi!

> Yes I can help! One of the little buildings will

> be a potting shed for garden things and the other

> will be a toilet you're right. It is a provate

> block though so will only be used by the residents

> in the flats there, it's not going to be a public

> toilet don't worry!

> Also the chances of any of the residents using it

> is slim as there are toilets inside the flats

> which begs the question why bother, but think it

> was just for ease if it was a lovely hot day and

> residents were having a bbq they could use the

> toilet there rather than go back inside flat.

>

> Hope thats cleared it up..they certainly wont be

> smelly as they will be maintained and also the

> chances of it being finished any time soon are

> slim!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...