Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The guys who were stripping it out in December told me it's to be a dental surgery, and they seemed to think it was going to be part of the same surgery that will open at 2 Lordship Lane [which I think has been granted planning recently]so it would run all the way round the back of numbers 4 and 6 LL.


Clearly thats going to be the most orally well-catered street; the first house on the right as you walk along zenoria street is also currently a dentist's outfit!


Ultraconsultancy

Interesting.


If the Zenoria Street premises are used as the surgery entrance, and if an additional fire exit is provided, then the retail premises at 2 Lordship Lane could retain their retail use.


Has anyone seen the detail of the planning application?

Application Number: 07/AP/2186

Application registered Consultation period Awaiting decision Decided Appeal Appeal decided


Location: 2 LORDSHIP LANE, LONDON, SE22 8HN

Proposal: Change of use from a single retail unit (Class A1) with residential accommodation to a dental surgery occupying all floors (Class D1). Erection of flat roof ground floor rear extension, first floor and second floor rear extension. Alterations to shop front and front elevation.

Statutory start date: 21/09/2007

Decision issued: Granted

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...