Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Chick is being rather humble & modest here


He's actually part of the technical team that makes sure TV is broadcast correctly from Crystal Palace and other sites


So the loss of analogue is very personal to him ( I reckon he's even got pet names for each transmitter )


And I believe he's even been up to the top of the arial on many occasion


Nette;-)




(tu)


( oh and if your TV goes on the blink-it's his fault )

London art show marks end of analogue TV

An Arqiva analogue transmitter from Sudbury forms the centrepiece of a display by Simon Denny.

Arqiva is supporting a major exhibition entitled Remote Control organised by the Institute of Contemporary Arts in London this spring, which coincides with the digital switchover in London. The exhibition marks the end of analogue TV broadcasting, representing a milestone in the evolution of the medium. A high-power analogue transmitter, recently decommissioned from our Sudbury site in Suffolk, gets a 10-week reprieve before continuing on its journey of environmentally safe disposal.


Remote Control surveys the enormous impact that television has had upon contemporary culture and looks at how the next generation is responding to digital convergence. The exhibition includes many important works that reveal the power and influence of television broadcasting on politics and society.


Matt Williams, Curator at the Institute of Contemporary Arts, said: ?The physicality of the vintage TV transmitter from Arqiva impressed me a great deal and the idea of the signal being pushed through a series of valves. This is beautifully engineered, large and solid equipment that is normally never seen and yet has delivered the great televised events of our recent history to a mass audience.?


The area which includes the transmission equipment is designed by Berlin-based artist Simon Denny and also features works made for TV by artists such as David Hall, Richard Serra and Ant Farm (an American artist collective).




Peter Heslop, Director of Digital Switch Over at Arqiva, adds: ?For several years now our focus in Arqiva has been on designing and installing the new digital network, so it?s very pleasing to see the spotlight on the old analogue kit that has served us so well for the last few decades. There is little or no practical use for the old transmitters so it?s good that at least one of them will take on a final public role before joining the others in the recycling process.?


The transmitter is from a PYE klystron-based installation which has transmitted Channel 4 at Sudbury since 1982. The Remote Control exhibition takes place at the Institute of Contemporary Arts, The Mall, London between 3 April and 10 June. The ICA is in The Mall, just down from Admiralty Arch. Admission is free.

Wow! Well for a Southwark Circle member I just tried to retune her little television and even after retuning, with her internal little aerial attached to the 8 yr old digibox, we couldn't locate ITV3 C4 or C5!


Fortunately she has Virgin in the other rooms so she'll survive.


Elsewhere on this forum Chick posted up some absolutely wonderful photos from the top of the towers!

>Wow! Well for a Southwark Circle member I just tried to retune her little

>television and even after retuning, with her internal little aerial attached

> to the 8 yr old digibox, we couldn't locate ITV3 C4 or C5!


If it is an aerial/reception problem, you should find that _all_ of the channels contained within a multiplex are missing. You can see the new Crystal Palace multiplexes listed here. If that's her problem, it looks as if her set's not been able to tune to two of them, PSB2 and COM4. With an indoor aerial, it's probably worth the trouble of having several goes, with the aerial in slightly different positions. Once the TV or freeview box has found them, it will at least know about and remember them.


If that's not the problem, I did find, on one freeview box (Medion or Tevion, I think), that a few channels had been inserted at numbers in the 1000+ channel list number range, rather than in the one starting at 1. Once I'd found them, I moved them to their usual places in the sequence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...