Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh great, thanks all. The third party sites hadn't occurred to me. Going down the Southwark route will be the final option as would want to try all reasonable neighbour approaches first. Mind you they're not showing the same consideration back. It does seem odd to me that young, intelligent people with a good standard of living, etc, move in and then don't seem to want to enjoy a civil relationship with their neighbours. The attitude that "it's our flat/garden etc and we can do what we like" without showing any consideration to all those round them with regard to noise, daily sanding of furniture outside, parties, loud music, not collecting parcels that we've taken in for days, shrieking after midnight etc etc. smacks of entitlement and sadly it doesn't look as though it's going to change.
Thanks Sue - it's one of the options but don't know how long their tenancy is for so trying all other approaches first. I do think the owner has to take some responsibility for who they rent out to so that's why I was trying to locate her/him. If that doesn't work then will try the other options. Just cross that with all the nice weather use of my garden has had to be reduced due to the issues.

Unless you think that the tenant is in breach of their lease - and quiet and cooperative behaviour isn't a normal lease condition - although e.g. sub-letting or occupancy levels might be - then there is very little a landlord could do. Tenants are (quite properly) protected from the capricious actions of landlords. Action through the council's officers is far more likely to achieve results. A landlord cannot themselves determine 'anti-social' behaviour.


If you believe that the lease is up for renewal you could write to the landlord explaining your problems, but if the landlord isn't having problems (the property is being treated well and the rent is being paid) I wouldn't hold your breathe.

I don't think the owner would be happy knowing she had difficult tenants without becoming involved in case it escalates. A lot of the issues are potentially resolvable but there are others and one involves a fence so can't imagine she will be happy getting a bill for replacement/repair if it can be sorted out by taking action now to prevent it. Also a few other neighbours could complain too. It would indeed be depressing if the tenants pressed on not caring a jot and I've learned that sometimes being tenacious can pay dividends.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They used to have dedicated park wardens, who I'm sure used to look after the parks and locked and opened the gates. Years ago I knew someone who was one. I thought they were based in that hut by the toilets. Are they not there any more? The community wardens are attached to the police rather than a specific park, aren't they?
    • Yes, sad how Rye Lane has taken a dive, interesting to see those pics CPR Dave. It's shocking how the section between Choumert Road and the Nag's Head in particular has lost its vibrancy, meanwhile the next section to the top of Peckham Rye Common has gentrified. Wonder why such a distinction in fortunes? Anyway the station square plans have fallen behind yet again, demolition won't now start this summer. The only "work" that will now take place this summer is surveying of the arcade, which they've had 10 years since planning permission to do. At least the replacement TSB branch has progressed but the Blenheim Grove corner building still looks unfinished, despite claims it "is now complete". https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/current-and-future-development/peckham-and-nunhead-2
    • DKH was two form entry, it is now one form entry to cope with the fact it was far more under subscribed than other schools in the area. They had actually combined year groups into single classes, 3/4 and 5/6.  When a school changes name, it’s usually because of a bad reputation perhaps the results.  The new name is dry with no history unlike its current name. It’s a very sketchy decision. It’s an expensive vanity project for someone.  What  will happen if the name change does not increase applications to the school?     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...