Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh great, thanks all. The third party sites hadn't occurred to me. Going down the Southwark route will be the final option as would want to try all reasonable neighbour approaches first. Mind you they're not showing the same consideration back. It does seem odd to me that young, intelligent people with a good standard of living, etc, move in and then don't seem to want to enjoy a civil relationship with their neighbours. The attitude that "it's our flat/garden etc and we can do what we like" without showing any consideration to all those round them with regard to noise, daily sanding of furniture outside, parties, loud music, not collecting parcels that we've taken in for days, shrieking after midnight etc etc. smacks of entitlement and sadly it doesn't look as though it's going to change.
Thanks Sue - it's one of the options but don't know how long their tenancy is for so trying all other approaches first. I do think the owner has to take some responsibility for who they rent out to so that's why I was trying to locate her/him. If that doesn't work then will try the other options. Just cross that with all the nice weather use of my garden has had to be reduced due to the issues.

Unless you think that the tenant is in breach of their lease - and quiet and cooperative behaviour isn't a normal lease condition - although e.g. sub-letting or occupancy levels might be - then there is very little a landlord could do. Tenants are (quite properly) protected from the capricious actions of landlords. Action through the council's officers is far more likely to achieve results. A landlord cannot themselves determine 'anti-social' behaviour.


If you believe that the lease is up for renewal you could write to the landlord explaining your problems, but if the landlord isn't having problems (the property is being treated well and the rent is being paid) I wouldn't hold your breathe.

I don't think the owner would be happy knowing she had difficult tenants without becoming involved in case it escalates. A lot of the issues are potentially resolvable but there are others and one involves a fence so can't imagine she will be happy getting a bill for replacement/repair if it can be sorted out by taking action now to prevent it. Also a few other neighbours could complain too. It would indeed be depressing if the tenants pressed on not caring a jot and I've learned that sometimes being tenacious can pay dividends.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Looking to borrow a gazebo for birthday party this Saturday, can you help? Julian - 07961463111
    • Whilst I agree, I have been thinking about this recently in relation to some of the other posts on here about anti social behaviour. We are all products of our upbringing - our experiences at home, school and beyond - plus whatever we have inherited genetically which might affect our behaviour (the nature/nurture thing). So in this case, if people haven't been brought up to love and appreciate trees and other wild things, plus as you say they may be deeply unhappy (or have other undiagnosed issues) it's easy to see how they could have ended up doing this. Also, it's possible they had quite low intelligence and didn't really grasp what they were doing and the effect it would have on so many other people. But that's just surmise and possibly completely wrong. From what I've read about it, they seemed to be two mates egging each other on, like two big kids. I'm not for a minute excusing what they did, and it's right they should be punished, but I really hope they might get some sort of rehabilitation in prison (it would  be appropriate to have them do some kind of community service like planting saplings, wouldn't it, or working in woodland conservation). And the same goes for phone robbers and shoplifters (rehabilitation, not planting saplings), though for SOME  shoplifters there might also be other issues at play, not excluding poverty. Sorry Jasonlondon,  I've gone off at a real tangent here, lucky it's in the lounge! Oh oops I've just noticed it isn't. Sorry admin. Oh, and then there's a whole philosophical discussion to be had about free will and determinism ..... 🤣🤣🤣
    • Thanks! I'll find out in a few weeks when I get the results! It was one of those disconcerting things where a disembodied voice keeps booming  at you to breathe in and hold it, then breathe normally. Apart from that it was OK, all completely painless. I imagine there will be quite a few people going from ED, though I presume it covers the whole Southwark area 
    • Two men behind ‘senseless’ felling of Sycamore Gap tree jailed for more than four years Good to see these two jailed today for four years. There’s something deeply disturbing about people who destroy trees—any tree. Whether it’s a centuries-old landmark or a sapling in a quiet park, trees are living beings that offer beauty, shade, and life. The men who cut down the Sycamore Gap tree are a stark example of how far some people will go to lash out at something peaceful and meaningful. People who harm nature like this aren’t just destructive—they are often deeply unhappy. It takes a troubled mind to look at a tree and see something to ruin instead of something to protect. Read more here  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...