Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Last night caused me to question whether Ireland

> deserved to be at the championships at all to be

> honest. With bottom half premiership players and

> lower league players, it was probably a major

> achievement to qualify, but they did nothing for

> the tournament. Comfortably the weakest team

> there.


We was robbed. Did you not see the ref push over the Irish player? Also, how can Spain get away with all that timewasting? 850 times they passed the ball to each other and most of the time going nowhere. There should have been about twenty minutes added time in both halves which is where we normally come good. I do think old Trap got his selection wrong though. He only picked 11 when the game was crying out for at least 14 or 15 on the pitch.


Ah well, at least we can look forward to beating the rugby world champions in the morning. Can't we?????

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's the eyes. Something about the eyes. And the

> neck is suspect too.


I think you could be on to something there *Bob*...

http://www.wramrobinson.demon.nl/scar/SCARLET3.JPG


Rumour has it Shearer has been employed as a pundit specifically for his unfeasibly shiny pate to act as an anti-Mysteron Twin Ring defence shield...

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Carroll's effectiveness would be calculated as a

> percentage of (opportunities converted /

> opportunities received).

>

> By any definition the amount of crosses he

> recceives would be a measure of the effectiveness

> of the winger?

>

> Just saying, like.


I've already mentioned, earlier in the thread, about using Young to supply crosses to Carroll. Keep up please!

I did worry he was never going to bring Walcott or Ox-C on, even when the Swedes were running at the England defenders and showing how effective that could be, but all's well that ends.. etc, etc.


And Hansen's 'new look' is surely down to an eyebrow upgrade...http://www.partydomain.co.uk/images/T/1453601.jpg...




Oh, and isn't it nice to have a goalie who can really punch - like they did in all the Roy of the Rovers games I personally coached attended er, saw.


ETA: Okay I only read the match reports but it was just like being there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    • It took the Tories 14 years to dig that 20bn blackhole. It's taken Labour 14 months to double it.  You cant get rid of Reeves though because the next person will actually be totally incompetent. There are no MPs in Labour capable of performing better than the current shower.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...