Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Last night caused me to question whether Ireland

> deserved to be at the championships at all to be

> honest. With bottom half premiership players and

> lower league players, it was probably a major

> achievement to qualify, but they did nothing for

> the tournament. Comfortably the weakest team

> there.


We was robbed. Did you not see the ref push over the Irish player? Also, how can Spain get away with all that timewasting? 850 times they passed the ball to each other and most of the time going nowhere. There should have been about twenty minutes added time in both halves which is where we normally come good. I do think old Trap got his selection wrong though. He only picked 11 when the game was crying out for at least 14 or 15 on the pitch.


Ah well, at least we can look forward to beating the rugby world champions in the morning. Can't we?????

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's the eyes. Something about the eyes. And the

> neck is suspect too.


I think you could be on to something there *Bob*...

http://www.wramrobinson.demon.nl/scar/SCARLET3.JPG


Rumour has it Shearer has been employed as a pundit specifically for his unfeasibly shiny pate to act as an anti-Mysteron Twin Ring defence shield...

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Carroll's effectiveness would be calculated as a

> percentage of (opportunities converted /

> opportunities received).

>

> By any definition the amount of crosses he

> recceives would be a measure of the effectiveness

> of the winger?

>

> Just saying, like.


I've already mentioned, earlier in the thread, about using Young to supply crosses to Carroll. Keep up please!

I did worry he was never going to bring Walcott or Ox-C on, even when the Swedes were running at the England defenders and showing how effective that could be, but all's well that ends.. etc, etc.


And Hansen's 'new look' is surely down to an eyebrow upgrade...http://www.partydomain.co.uk/images/T/1453601.jpg...




Oh, and isn't it nice to have a goalie who can really punch - like they did in all the Roy of the Rovers games I personally coached attended er, saw.


ETA: Okay I only read the match reports but it was just like being there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...