Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Seriously, no one is suggesting England looked great, in some areas they were awful, but it was a great match. Doesn't mean they're gonna win anything.


Was surprised that Guy Mobray (sp?) of the BBC gave Gerrard top score (of the starters) in his player ratings. I love Stevie G, and didn't think he did badly (UDT and his best mate Jah will no doubt tell us otherwise), but star man?!?!


Ashley Young needs to up his game a lot.


Carroll deserves credit for doing his job, but will no doubt make way for Rooney.


Welbeck is starting to look like he belongs at this level.


Lets not forget though, Sweden are average, and we gave them 2 goals.

The two goals were down to poor marking. Shocking really at that level.


Jah knows his football and so do I. No surprise in our agreement. Anyway, I thought he was your drinking buddy, Otta.


Johnson caught my eye and he didn't put a foot wrong throughout the game. Walcott was the inspired substitute who saved England's embarrassment.

Carroll could have scored more if he was given more crosses. Watching the exchange between Carroll and Young wasn't a very good sign. Young has the quality to supply crosses but seemed reluctant to do so and seemed to choose the wrong option each time.


I thought Gerrard had a mixed game. No surprise about Guy Mobray selecting a big name. It's often the case when journalists or commentators panders to non-footballing experts.

After the shambles of the last World Cup, it was great just to see In-ger-land win a game in a competetive competition again.

So the big questions for the Ukraine match are...will Hodgson revert back to the more defensive minded system he employed against France, or last night's more offensive approach?

And who will drop out to accommodate Rooney?

Personally, I would like us to attack Ukraine, who cares if it's another nailbiting 3-2 win, let's try and win the group and avoid Spain.

I thought Carroll played as well as he could, but he didn't really get the service because we don't have out and out wingers, his goal came from a deep midfield pass from Gerrard. So I'd start with Rooney and Welbeck because of their familiarity at club level. Young had a good first half against France, but has disappointed since. Again it might be better to start with him because he will know Rooney's and Welbeck's game better. Although Walcott changed the game last night, can he do that from the off, not frequently enough IMO, I think he would make for a better impact sub like last night. Other than that I think the team picks itself, but Hodgson might decide that 3 games in 9 days will catch up with some of the players, and fresh legs will be needed, especially as we will be playing back in the heat of Donetsk.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I thought Gerrard had a mixed game. No surprise

> about Guy Mobray selecting a big name. It's often

> the case when journalists or commentators panders

> to non-footballing experts.


Mowbray picked Welbeck as his MOTM for the France game.

Quite right too, along with Johnson they have been our best players over the two games.

I'm really pleased to see Johnson playing so well, especially as many questioned his selection (which was fair enough), but he's shown he deserves his place.


Agree Rooney, Welbeck and Young should start next match, with Carroll to come on if we need a change.


Theo definitely best as an impact sub, when opposition are starting to get tired legs.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Agree Rooney, Welbeck and Young should start next

> match, with Carroll to come on if we need a

> change.


I expected some 'criticism' picking a Man Utd front 3, but I genuinely think because we have a new manager who is trying to implement new systems, it's important we have players who already know each other's games inside out.

Last night's match was always going to be a bit of a Premiership slugfest, so Carroll was a good call by Hodgson. Still, I couldn't help sniggering when Terry got swatted like a fly a couple of times by Ibrahimovic :-)

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undisputedtruth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I thought Gerrard had a mixed game. No surprise

> > about Guy Mobray selecting a big name. It's

> often

> > the case when journalists or commentators

> panders

> > to non-footballing experts.

>

> Mowbray picked Welbeck as his MOTM for the France

> game.

> Quite right too, along with Johnson they have been

> our best players over the two games.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18462232


Actually was Walcott who got the highest rating with 9. Gerrard & Welbeck received the same score of 8.


I'd like to see Ox and Walcott start the next game as I think Ukraine look weak in the full back areas. Definitely put Carroll back on the bench and decide whether to play Welbeck or Young with Rooney.



Terry looked like someone on a couple of occasions who was trying to run waist high in water in a swimming pool. I suspect he is actually a weak link in the defence now. As for Ibrahimovic, he reminded of a wild horse who was difficult to stop. The shame on him was he seemed completely selfish and didn't trust his team mates by passing the ball to them.

Was reading on BBC News that Sweden feel they were the better team and "deserved" a win.


Now, I don't watch much football, but to the layman, it looked like England scored three pretty decent goals, while the two that Sweden scored were from free kicks, given away due to dirty tackles. As bad as England were for long periods of the game, I'm not sure how you could say Sweden "deserved" victory.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...