Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I respect Jah Lush posts when he talks about

> football from a footballing angle.


I agree, especially when he freely admits he made a wrong prediction...


Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm... well, I got that one wrong. Spain

> different class.

I never do predictions in football because there are so many variables. Yes I have expectations but they are not the same as predictions. I don't have a crystal ball. It's for the same reason why I don't go to betting shops.


@Otta, is there a law that I should answer stupid questions? You answered one of my questions with a question as you knew I hit it on the nail. Just how long will you keep up your personal vendetta?

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

You guys just don't get it do you?

UDT has a bit of South American* in him.

So just like when Suarez said that Negrito was a term of endearment, when UDT says he's right, he's actually saying he's wrong...comprende?


*at the weekend he has a lot of South American in him (allegedly), but that's another thread...

I was expecting Italy to field a 3-5-2 formation in an attempt to nullify Spain's six midfield players. I'm saddened that Prendelli did nothing to overcome Spain's numerical advantage in key positions. Also Chiellini got a start over Balzaretti. Balzaretti made a difference when he came on. Injuries played a key part in the game. Chiellini clearly wasn't fit. Nor was Thiago Motta.


No doubt Spain are worthy winners. They defended well. Just wish it was more of a contest.

UDT wrote:

----------

>It's usually the same few individuals who feel they have a god given right to dictate what can be said on a forum.



I always dictate what I say on the forum - I am far to bloody posh to tappy tap it all out mnysolf.




*Wages will be docked for that deliberate spelling error Jooves.


ETA: relevant quote

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lanzarote? No wonder you have low self-esteem.



It's the ultimate low self-esteem destination. I've booked myself, Pibe, Otta, Strafer, Red Devil, Hugenot, Jeremy, Jah and six thousand other users in - so we can all have low self-esteem together.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Lanzarote? No wonder you have low self-esteem.

>

>

> It's the ultimate low self-esteem destination.

> I've booked myself, Pibe, Otta, Strafer, Red

> Devil, Hugenot, Jeremy, Jah and six thousand other

> users in - so we can all have low self-esteem

> together.



Thanks Bob. I could do with a holiday... certainly from this thread. Surely, this is the end? Let's all feck off and take a break. The Euros are over now. It's all gone a bit pear shaped and personal anyway. Also, I think Tillie may have made a rather good point.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
    • Some people are all of the above. Would happily ban them, or send them to training school
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...