Jump to content

Euro 2012

????

By ????
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I respect Jah Lush posts when he talks about

> football from a footballing angle.


I agree, especially when he freely admits he made a wrong prediction...


Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm... well, I got that one wrong. Spain

> different class.

Undisputedtruth

Undisputedtruth

Posted
Posted

I never do predictions in football because there are so many variables. Yes I have expectations but they are not the same as predictions. I don't have a crystal ball. It's for the same reason why I don't go to betting shops.


@Otta, is there a law that I should answer stupid questions? You answered one of my questions with a question as you knew I hit it on the nail. Just how long will you keep up your personal vendetta?

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

I must not torture the weak.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

You guys just don't get it do you?

UDT has a bit of South American* in him.

So just like when Suarez said that Negrito was a term of endearment, when UDT says he's right, he's actually saying he's wrong...comprende?


*at the weekend he has a lot of South American in him (allegedly), but that's another thread...

Undisputedtruth

Undisputedtruth

Posted
Posted

I was expecting Italy to field a 3-5-2 formation in an attempt to nullify Spain's six midfield players. I'm saddened that Prendelli did nothing to overcome Spain's numerical advantage in key positions. Also Chiellini got a start over Balzaretti. Balzaretti made a difference when he came on. Injuries played a key part in the game. Chiellini clearly wasn't fit. Nor was Thiago Motta.


No doubt Spain are worthy winners. They defended well. Just wish it was more of a contest.

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

UDT wrote:

----------

>It's usually the same few individuals who feel they have a god given right to dictate what can be said on a forum.



I always dictate what I say on the forum - I am far to bloody posh to tappy tap it all out mnysolf.




*Wages will be docked for that deliberate spelling error Jooves.


ETA: relevant quote

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lanzarote? No wonder you have low self-esteem.



It's the ultimate low self-esteem destination. I've booked myself, Pibe, Otta, Strafer, Red Devil, Hugenot, Jeremy, Jah and six thousand other users in - so we can all have low self-esteem together.

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Lanzarote? No wonder you have low self-esteem.

>

>

> It's the ultimate low self-esteem destination.

> I've booked myself, Pibe, Otta, Strafer, Red

> Devil, Hugenot, Jeremy, Jah and six thousand other

> users in - so we can all have low self-esteem

> together.



Thanks Bob. I could do with a holiday... certainly from this thread. Surely, this is the end? Let's all feck off and take a break. The Euros are over now. It's all gone a bit pear shaped and personal anyway. Also, I think Tillie may have made a rather good point.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • mccatonline
      Cleaner available

      By mccatonline · Posted

      A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • vladi
      Is Peter Mandelson toast

      By vladi · Posted

      I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • ArchieCarlos
      Planning application - new Underhill Rd residential development

      By ArchieCarlos · Posted

      Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • Spartacus
      Is Peter Mandelson toast

      By Spartacus · Posted

      I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...