Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello


Doctors are due to strike this Thursday over pensions, meaning that thousands of operations, hospital appointments and scans will be cancelled - is there anyone on the forum being affected by the strike who would be willing to chat about it for a small fee? Pls PM for more info. Thanks v much.

Doctors' pensions are simply deferred pay - doctors have paid for their pensions themselves, their scheme is not unstainable, it is not in deficit and now they are being told it's being cut.


The fact that it's the first doctors' industrial dispute for 40 years speaks volumes for the strength of feeling.


Good luck to all of them.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If doctors can defer sufficient pay from the

> public purse to generate a 100k a year pension,

> then we'd have to ask whether they're currently

> being overpaid?


They're no more overpaid than marketing people like Hugo. At least Doctors do something useful like saving lives.

Chippy Minton Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Doctors' pensions are simply deferred pay -

> doctors have paid for their pensions themselves,

> their scheme is not unstainable, it is not in

> deficit and now they are being told it's being

> cut.

>

> The fact that it's the first doctors' industrial

> dispute for 40 years speaks volumes for the

> strength of feeling.

>

> Good luck to all of them.


If doctors are paying for the pensions themselves, how can the government cut it? Are you saying there is no taxpayer involvement here?

Dominic Lawson observed this of the new deal:


"The average doctor's pension if he retires at 68 will be ?68,000 a year. To put that in context: if you wanted to buy a joint annuity which would provide that sum in retirement (and for your spouse after your death), it would cost about ?2m on the open market [...] and of which over 85 per cent would come courtesy of the taxpayer."


i.e. to get a Doctor's pension you'd need to save two million quid before you retired.


UDT may think I don't derseve my salary, but I'll never save 2m in my lifetime, and I'm not sure that being an expert gardener or secret premiership player manager deserves much of a salary either ;-).


And 85% of that money comes from the taxpayer.


The 'private fund' that the Unions refer to is the NHS fund (which is as observed currently in surplus, but won't be in surplus once we've all lived longer in greater numbers).


The goverment is legislating for a 65 years old retirement date, and a 14.5% salary witholding to pay for the pension.


All that cash (the NHS fund or the doctor's salaries) comes from the taxpayer, and the government is quite within it's rights to negotiate the terms of those agreements.


Needless to say the doctors want to retire younger, pay less and get bigger pensions.

It's nothing to do with a personal attack on me or Marks and Spencer advertising.


The average UK adult will spend twice as much on beer every year as he does on funding the NHS.


If the taxpayer wants to pay doctors more and let them retire earlier on pensions of 68,000 a year that's entirely up to them, they are fully entitled to vote in political parties on the back of 'increase our taxes NOW' arguments.


But they don't do they?


So you'll need a more intelligent argument?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...