Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well, at least everyone knows that now there is a

> personal risk of being named and shamed so it may

> be a motivation to pick up your dog's poo.



or that there's risk that an anonymous person hiding behind a keyboard will post a picture of someone that you don't and make allegations that you've got no idea whether they're true on not


I don't think that it's appropriate

?kid krugger As you have exposed my picture which has distress me and without any proof of wrong doing just a allegation, I will seek advice for harresment and wrong doing on your part. you will be hearing from me soon?


This is bullshit.

The person in the photograph, I saw her dog shit against the tree outside the card shop while she waited for it to finish then she crossed Lordship Lane to the health shop then walked along to the betting shop which is around the time that I photographed her, at this time she stuck her head in the door of the betting shop.

I don?t need any proof because I saw her dog shit on the street and this is not a court.

After taking her photograph I went back and picked up her dog?s shit and put it in the bin for her.

What I?d appreciate at this time is a THANK YOU, not a challenge, because I was there CLEANING UP AFTER HER.

Feel free to try and find evidence of a history of my telling lies previously.

Of course I considered carefully my OP, and I?m 100% confidence in the accuracy of what I posted.

The appropriate response here is not to question my character, but to hold your hand up and admit irresponsible anti-social behaviour, apologise, then confirm you will stop it.

It?s simply not OK to line the high st in dogshit, stop trying to distract.

Jeeez, I?m not even going to charge for the doggy bag !

It happened.

You did it.

You know you did it.

I know you did it.

Stop lying.

And sort your behaviour out.

(If you are the person in the photo).

I can understand some peoples concerns about posting photos on a public forum, but the behaviour has to stop and short of putting somebody in the stocks and throwing rotten fruit at them it isn?t going to be fixed.

If admin think there is a case for taking the photos down, fine that?s up to them.

But if I see this again I will do exactly the same.

It is not okay.

I?ve approached people before having seen their dogs foul public spaces, and they just get defensive, aggressive, and come out with some shit excuse (pun intended).

Too many people in this neighbourhood are fouling the streets and parks and those I see I will publicise if I can.

That's why u put my picture up, to make people follow me, you have acted inappropriate and unkind, aS I SAID, I HAVE NO RECOLLECTION OF THIS, SO YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO JUST PUT MY PICTURE UP WITHOUT ANY PHOTOGRAPHIC PROOF OF WROMG DOING! END OFF! ALSO YOU SAY IN ONE OF YOUR POST. IVE BEEN DOING IT FOR YEARS! SO NOW IT DOES FEEL PERSONAL. U SEEM VERY ANGRY IN ALL YOU POSTS.

I

I

I support KK in raising the issue and I don't believe for one minute that (he/ she) would have posted this without good reason. Perhaps the best thing would have been to ask the shop for CCTV as well.


It's a vile habit and I've witnessed people just walk away too. It's an offence and if a post like this makes people stop and think, then good.


Perhaps the best thing is to be obvious about taking photos. And maybe get the camera out sooner.


People post photos and videos on the forum frequently, of people who's behaviour is suspect.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Both notoriously “lovely” people to spend any time with or worse, serve 
    • No, just no.  Zero tolerance does not mean we expect zero crime but that we do not accept a standard level as normal and unavoidable. For those who have suffered such “minor” crimes, myself included having had my house broken into,  it is clear from the lack of action that they are considered “acceptable”’. Once small crimes become known to be ignored, it changes where and how we live.     
    • Lloyd Weber and Cilla Black were supposed to leave when Blair got in, but didn't
    • You can't have zero tolerance unless you live in a fascist/police state.  Sadly it is something you have to accept in a democracy.  There has always been crime, even in North Korea, the Soviet bloc, Nazi Germany, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge etc.   The discussion point is how big a police force we need and capabilities, punishment, and building communities.  And how much we are prepared to pay in extra taxation. Even in the good (economic) times there is crime.  And crime under both Labour and Tory governments. I do not accept that phone thefts and parcel thefts are just statistics.  Police have to prioritise what they do, we might not agree with it.  And most criminals are multi-tasking, moving to where the best return is considering the risk of being caught. And there has to be a market, someone somewhere needs to buy a stolen product (I never buy off Gumtree). A starting point would be to decriminalise all illegal drugs, but that is definitely for a separate Lounge conversation, interesting discussion paper here: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/105520/1/A. Stevens - In defence of the decriminalisation of drug possession in the uk - PPDF.pdf Did you watch any of the series of Peaky Blinders?  This was a very popular series that glorified gang crime and violence.  Funny (ironic) that may enjoy films and TV that does this.  Although only the first series had any historical accuracy in it,  Criminal gangs were around before and ever since.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...