Jump to content

Dog Fouler on Lordship Lane - noon 23/10/19

KidKruger

By KidKruger
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

KidKruger

KidKruger

Posted
Posted

Delightful lady had her dog shit against the tree outside the greeting card shop, then crossed Lordship Lane over to the health shop before walking up to the betting shop for (presumably) her partner.

If you know the lady please tell her I picked up her dogs poo for her and put it in the bin.

Perhaps also tell her that doggy bags are really really cheap, in fact she could probably get them free from the council, should she ever be minded to actually pick up after her dog has fouled on the main pavement in East Dulwich. Where is it


[Photos removed on request - Admin]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KidKruger

KidKruger

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It would be great if that was the case, wouldn?t it.

However as I walked past the lady with my dog and waved doggy bags to make it clear I had some available she didn?t seem interested enough to subscribe.

I know, perhaps she was shortsighted and/or doesn?t like talking to strangers ?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jules-and-Boo

Jules-and-Boo

Posted
Posted

Are they ever, if you're not on the beach?

The urban equivalent is Sliders


These are the gucci ones


https://www.gucci.com/uk/en_gb/pr/men/shoes-for-men/sandals-and-slides-for-men/web-slide-sandal-p-429469GIB109079?lgw_code=9565-807189669&ranMID=37933&ranEAID=gcdL%2FATRVoE&ranSiteID=gcdL_ATRVoE-a.LVcyPPy351JVo1OegSnQ&utm_source=Linkshare_UK&utm_medium=affiliates&utm_campaign=1&utm_content=10&utm_term=2523611&siteID=gcdL_ATRVoE-a.LVcyPPy351JVo1OegSnQ&PublisherSID=2523611&PubName=Lyst+UK%2FEU

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBPy

SBPy

Posted
Posted

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Delightful lady had her dog shit against the tree

> outside the greeting card shop, then crossed

> Lordship Lane over to the health shop before

> walking up to the betting shop for (presumably)

> her partner.

> If you know the lady please tell her I picked up

> her dogs poo for her and put it in the bin.

> Perhaps also tell her that doggy bags are really

> really cheap, in fact she could probably get them

> free from the council, should she ever be minded

> to actually pick up after her dog has fouled on

> the main pavement in East Dulwich. Where is it


Do not want to be the devil's advocate here as I strongly condemn dog fouling but you can be exposed to legal liability for posting pictures of her without her consent... just saying!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark

Mark

Posted
Posted

SBPy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Do not want to be the devil's advocate here as I

> strongly condemn dog fouling but you can be

> exposed to legal liability for posting pictures of

> her without her consent... just saying!


Please you explain why? She's in a public place

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Renatus

Renatus

Posted
Posted

The Dogs (Fouling of Land) Act 1996 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The purpose of the Act was to create a criminal offence if a dog defecates at any time on designated land and a person who is in charge of the dog at that time fails to remove the faeces from the land forthwith.


Under those orders, a person who doesn't clean up after their dog may face an on-the-spot fine of up to ?80. These fines are known as fixed penalty notices. If a person refuses to pay they can be taken to the local Magistrates Court for the dog fouling offence and fined up to ?1,000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
seenbeen

seenbeen

Posted
Posted

Mscrawthew Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is there any reason you couldn't of asked her at

> the time?


I wuoldn't approach her...she is anti-social not picking up- I doubt if speaking to her would achieve anything except the obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
first mate

first mate

Posted
Posted

That Act was repealed. Dog fouling now covered by Cleaner Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 and one to do with anti social behaviour and policing 2014 ( sorry cannot recall full name). In a nutshell, dealing with fouling is down to local councils under existing Dog Control Orders or new PCSOs. Goose Green is a under a PCSO as is Peckham Rye, so the legislation is there and wardens etc.. can issue FPNs of ?100 or if it goes to court ?1000 fine.


Not sure how streets are covered. Perhaps under the 2014 Act but not sure. TBH the legislation has always been there for fines to be issued by Council Officers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBPy

SBPy

Posted
Posted

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SBPy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Do not want to be the devil's advocate here as

> I

> > strongly condemn dog fouling but you can be

> > exposed to legal liability for posting pictures

> of

> > her without her consent... just saying!

>

> Please you explain why? She's in a public place


It?s not against the law to take a photograph of a person in public, assuming they don?t have a reasonable expectation of privacy and your actions don?t harass, alarm or distress them. However, it?s what happens to the photo after it?s taken that could have wider implications. Think of someone taking pictures of children in a park and posting them online, or scammers using images of strangers to set up fake dating and social media profile.. There is the issue of online harassment which can happen if a picture goes viral and the subject is identified...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
lucy123

lucy123

Posted
Posted

KID KRUGGER


Iam the victim That you are trying to expose! I am horrified you would sink to new lows to shame people! yes that fine, you can make an allegation against me but make sure you have any proof (if any) I do not recall walking past the card shop and allowing the dog to foul! Do u have photographic evidence of this? if not then it is not your place to put my picture online without my permission, you should go to the council, this is seen as dafamation of character AND HARESMENT IF YOU ARE ASKING THE MEMBERS OF PUBLIC TO GO VIRAL! This behaviour has caused me great distress! In you post, you have presumed quite a lot about me and my character, which I am very offended and I will seek advice about you posting my picture. DO you have the actual evidence of the dog pooing? that's what you should post to shame me, not a picture of me walking by!


Ive noticed from all you posts you go round complaining or critising and now dafamation of character. which is totally unacceptable.


Is that why you call yourself kidkrugger? does the name say it all. I'm glad you called me delightful, I wish I could say the same about you!


I hope you realise the extent of the damage that you cause by your behaviour!, I'm sure you have no conscience when it comes to doing the right thing or wrong thing in your case!


Are you working for the authorities? if not, them its not your place to put pictures up with out permission!, I suggest you take it down. you've been incredibily unpleasant, at least if I make a statement, I make a fact statement.


I will seek advice

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Earl Aelfheah

Earl Aelfheah

Posted
Posted

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are they ever, if you're not on the beach?

> The urban equivalent is Sliders

>

> These are the gucci ones

>

> https://www.gucci.com/uk/en_gb/pr/men/shoes-for-me

> n/sandals-and-slides-for-men/web-slide-sandal-p-42

> 9469GIB109079?lgw_code=9565-807189669&ranMID=37933

> &ranEAID=gcdL%2FATRVoE&ranSiteID=gcdL_ATRVoE-a.LVc

> yPPy351JVo1OegSnQ&utm_source=Linkshare_UK&utm_medi

> um=affiliates&utm_campaign=1&utm_content=10&utm_te

> rm=2523611&siteID=gcdL_ATRVoE-a.LVcyPPy351JVo1OegS

> nQ&PublisherSID=2523611&PubName=Lyst+UK%2FEU


Wow! Anyone spending ?180 on Gucci Sliders needs to have a word with themselves

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Earl Aelfheah

Earl Aelfheah

Posted
Posted

lucy123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am the victim That you are trying to expose! I

> am horrified you would sink to new lows to shame

> people! yes that fine, you can make an allegation

> against me but make sure you have the proof (if

> any) I do not recall walking past the card shop

> and allowing the dog to foul! Do u have

> photographic evidence of this? if not then it is

> not your place to put my picture online without my

> permission, you should go to the council, this is

> seen as defimation of character. In you post, you

> have presumed quite a lot about me and my

> character, which I am very offended and I will

> seek advice about you posting my picture. if you

> have the actual evidence of the dog pooing, that's

> what you should post to shame me, not a picture of

> me walking by!

>

> Ive noticed from all you posts you go round

> complaining or critising and now defimation of

> character. which is totally unacceptable.

>

> Is that why you call yourself kidkrugger? does the

> name say it all. I'm glad you called me

> delightful, I wish I could say the same about you!

>

>

> I hope you realise the extent of damage that you

> cause by your behaviour, I'm sure you have no

> conscience when it comes to doing the right thing!

>

>

> Are you working for the authorities? if not, them

> its not your place to put pictures up with out

> permission!, I suggest you take it down. you've

> been incredibily unpleasant, at least if I make a

> statement, I make a fact statement.


So are you saying that you do pick up after your dog, or that there is no evidence that you don't?


Must admit, I think the posting of photos / public shaming is a bit much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • South East Lad
      ED Nature Watch

      By South East Lad · Posted

      Ahh!! Poor snail, isn't nature cruel!
    • Rockets
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By Rockets · Posted

      But you have to assess whether these persistent drivers are creating more safety issues than diverting emergency vehicles on a longer route and clearly they are not. The fact members of the pro-closure lobby have built their argument on this actually shows how desperate, some would say selfish, they are to have the junction closed and just the way they want it. And unfortunately they seem to have the council over a barrel on something as the council weakly concedes to their position without hesitation. Was this not borne from an FOI that said one of the emergency services confirmed that they had not been consulted on the new DV design that Cllr Leeming then said was actually a mistake by the emergency services - and then it's a case of whether you believe Cllr Leeming or not....and his track record is hardly unblemished when it comes to all things LTNs? Exactly! When the "small vocal minority" was given a mouthpiece that proved it was anything other than small then some have repeatedly tried to discredit the mouthpiece.  The far-left has never been very good at accountability and One Dulwich is forcing our local councillors and council to be accountable to constituents and it wouldn't surprise me if the council are behind a lot of the depositioning activities as One Dulwich is stopping them from getting CPZs rolled out and must be seen as a huge thorn in the side of the idealogical plan they have. Southwark Labour has a long track record of trying to stifle constituents with a view that differs from theirs (see Cllr Leo Pollack for one example) or depositioning anyone trying to represent them (see Cllr Williams during the infamous Cllr Rose "mansplaining" episode. But you know, some think it's One Dulwich that are the greatest threat to local democracy and should not be trusted! 😉
    • GinSpark
      ED Nature Watch

      By GinSpark · Posted

      A song thrush visited my back garden today. I watched as it smashed open a snail by whacking it against the patio.
    • Earl Aelfheah
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By Earl Aelfheah · Posted

      I have no doubt that local people are genuinely involved (and personally can understand their not wanting to publicise their involvement). That said the proliferation of One groups across London and the degree of co-ordination suggests it is more than just a local grassroots group. I’m not really that interested, except that many of their supporters do bang on about transparency and accountability. I would be interested in the substance of their latest missive. Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Who genuinely believes that people are partially covering their plates and driving through due to inadequate signage? Sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. It feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes tbh.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...