Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well, at least everyone knows that now there is a

> personal risk of being named and shamed so it may

> be a motivation to pick up your dog's poo.



or that there's risk that an anonymous person hiding behind a keyboard will post a picture of someone that you don't and make allegations that you've got no idea whether they're true on not


I don't think that it's appropriate

?kid krugger As you have exposed my picture which has distress me and without any proof of wrong doing just a allegation, I will seek advice for harresment and wrong doing on your part. you will be hearing from me soon?


This is bullshit.

The person in the photograph, I saw her dog shit against the tree outside the card shop while she waited for it to finish then she crossed Lordship Lane to the health shop then walked along to the betting shop which is around the time that I photographed her, at this time she stuck her head in the door of the betting shop.

I don?t need any proof because I saw her dog shit on the street and this is not a court.

After taking her photograph I went back and picked up her dog?s shit and put it in the bin for her.

What I?d appreciate at this time is a THANK YOU, not a challenge, because I was there CLEANING UP AFTER HER.

Feel free to try and find evidence of a history of my telling lies previously.

Of course I considered carefully my OP, and I?m 100% confidence in the accuracy of what I posted.

The appropriate response here is not to question my character, but to hold your hand up and admit irresponsible anti-social behaviour, apologise, then confirm you will stop it.

It?s simply not OK to line the high st in dogshit, stop trying to distract.

Jeeez, I?m not even going to charge for the doggy bag !

It happened.

You did it.

You know you did it.

I know you did it.

Stop lying.

And sort your behaviour out.

(If you are the person in the photo).

I can understand some peoples concerns about posting photos on a public forum, but the behaviour has to stop and short of putting somebody in the stocks and throwing rotten fruit at them it isn?t going to be fixed.

If admin think there is a case for taking the photos down, fine that?s up to them.

But if I see this again I will do exactly the same.

It is not okay.

I?ve approached people before having seen their dogs foul public spaces, and they just get defensive, aggressive, and come out with some shit excuse (pun intended).

Too many people in this neighbourhood are fouling the streets and parks and those I see I will publicise if I can.

That's why u put my picture up, to make people follow me, you have acted inappropriate and unkind, aS I SAID, I HAVE NO RECOLLECTION OF THIS, SO YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO JUST PUT MY PICTURE UP WITHOUT ANY PHOTOGRAPHIC PROOF OF WROMG DOING! END OFF! ALSO YOU SAY IN ONE OF YOUR POST. IVE BEEN DOING IT FOR YEARS! SO NOW IT DOES FEEL PERSONAL. U SEEM VERY ANGRY IN ALL YOU POSTS.

I

I

I support KK in raising the issue and I don't believe for one minute that (he/ she) would have posted this without good reason. Perhaps the best thing would have been to ask the shop for CCTV as well.


It's a vile habit and I've witnessed people just walk away too. It's an offence and if a post like this makes people stop and think, then good.


Perhaps the best thing is to be obvious about taking photos. And maybe get the camera out sooner.


People post photos and videos on the forum frequently, of people who's behaviour is suspect.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...