Jump to content

Recommended Posts

?KK You?ve got it wrong this time. And I think you know it.?


I don?t think so, and you don?t know anything about what I know. You weren?t there witnessing, I was.

I?m calling-our a street fouler publicly.

Your implication is that I am carrying out a behaviour that I know is wrong, that is simply not the case.


Admin - fair play, your call.

"People post photos and videos on the forum frequently, of people who's behaviour is suspect" are you sure ?


I can only think of shots from cameras at front doors showing people at 3am or whatever entering their house or looking at parked cars .

I don't recall anything similar to this ,pics of someone accused of not picking up after their dog .


May have missed it .

  • Administrator

To be clear, knowingly leaving your dog's do-dos in a public place is a criminal offence.

Please direct your community spirit at those that leave the mess there, not at those that clear it up and raise it as an issue.

TO PUT UP SOMEONES PICTURE IS BEING UTTERLY RECKLESS AND SPITEFUL, TO HUMILIATE CAUSE DISTRES TO ANOTHER HUMAN BEING, SO THAT IS HARRESMENT, IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AND YOU SHOULD NOT CONDONE IT! MAKES YOU JUST AS BAD IF YOU SUPPORT THIS PERSON IN MY OPION.


Y YOU DO NOT PUBICALY HUMILIATE ANYONE.- ITS NOT ACCEPTABLE,

"Please direct your community spirit at those that leave the mess there, not at those that clear it up and raise it as an issue."



Admin ,when you say "direct your community spirit at those that leave the mess " are you referring to posters on this thread ?


It's not clear to me if you are making general comments or whether you are endorsing criticism of lucy123


What would be your direction on how "community spirit" should be displayed/put into action ? Would you be in favour of the approach adopted on this thread ?

  • Administrator

Reporting offenders to the authorities with evidence is a good start.

Or returning the poo back to them so they can do something with it.

Educate the fecal ne'er-do-gooders that they've done wrong, raising their awareness that they are not improving the community and it's environment.

To me this thread seems nothing more than an infliction of a punishment on someone .


One person found to be guilty by another who decides on public humiliation as the way forward .


I don't think the motive is highlighting an issue or educating people .


And as said above ,great encouragement for some to extract vengence by posting images and making accusations that have not been sustantiated .

Not an answer Admin . Everything is debatable .


I think this thread doesn't count as education ,as said I think it's a vehicle for punishing someone thought to have done something wrong . Debate away - what do you think ?

NOW SOMEONE WITH SENSE, YES IM STARTING TO FEEL LIKE THIS IS PERSONAL TOO! FROM HIS COMMENT, BEEN DOING IT FOR YEARS AND YOU DONT KNOW WHAT I KNOW!

HE CANNOT CONTAIN HIS BITTERNESS,


I CAN NOT RECALL THE INCIDENT HE ACCUSES ME OFF BUT EVEN IF IT HAPPENED, HE HAS NO RIGHT TO PUBLICALLY HUMILIATE HATTESS AND STRESS ME! - PERIOD! I CANT UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE ARE OVERLOOKING HIS TERRIBLE BEHAVIOUR!

IT IS A FORM OF BULLYING IM SURE, ONLY A SOLICITOR WILL ADVISE ME AND I WILL DO THAT IN MY OWN LEISURE


IN MY OPION, SUPPORTING HUMILIATING BEHVIOUR SAYS ALOT ABOUT YOUR CHARACTORS TOO!

WHAT HAPPEN ABOUT NOT GUILTY TILL PROVEN, SEEM LIKE PEOPLE ARR ON THE BAND WAGON WITHOUT FACTUAL EVIDENCE! SHAME ON YOU THOSE WHO SUPPORT IT!

I DO NOT HOPE THAT THIS DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR HAPPENS TO ANY OF YOU! EBEN THOU IM STRESSED, IM STILL NOT A BITTER PERSON!

THANK YOU FOR THOSE REASONABLE PEOPLE WHO HAVE A BIT OF EMPATHY AND RECOGNISE HIS ATTROCIOUS ACTIOONS.


KK YOU ATR A HORRIBLE PERSON IN MY OPION!, I BELIEVE YOU WILL FIND YOUR CALLING ONE DAY, IM SURE THAT ADMINISTRATOR APPRECIATES YOUR THREADS, CAUSE OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU, YOU KEEP THE FORUM GOING! YAY


I

"Oh, tell us more, how do they know each other?" - nothing to tell ,why do you ask ?


For clarity - when I say "I'm sure" I'm using an expression . Couldn't prove it in a criminal court ,but as KK has pointed out ,this isn't one .

I don?t really agree with publishing photos. We don?t have public stocks anymore for good reason. That said, I would be surprised if the story is just made up and Lucy is not exactly denying it happened. So not that much sympathy.

?I'm sure KK had a reason for posting ,I'm also sure that the woman isn't someone random to him .?


1. I'm sure KK had a reason for posting.

Correct, hopefully that?s clear in my OP !


2. I'm also sure that the woman isn't someone random to him.

Incorrect. The street-fouler was random to me until that day.

Let?s not confuse Netflix with the real world !

Two wrongs don't make a right .


I really disliked the mindset of this thread which to me smacked v much of vigilantism and seemed to be being proposed ( even if in a light hearted way ) as an alternative to the stocks


"the behaviour has to stop and short of putting somebody in the stocks and throwing rotten fruit at them it isn?t going to be fixed."


I was surprised that Admin allowed the pic to go up in the first place and even more surprised by Admins's posts which to me seemed ambigious ( an ambiguity which wasn't clarified when I questioned it ) and easily intepreted as supporting this form of public stocks .

Thanks for clarifying . It was this post that I clearly misread.



"What IS against the law - and socially uncool - is having yer dog shite on the MAIN SHOPPING STREET in the town.

And other streets locally.

Every day.

For years."


Another case of is it a remark general in nature or is it a rematk aimed at someone in particular .The joys of the written word .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...