Jump to content

Dog Fouler on Lordship Lane - noon 23/10/19

KidKruger

By KidKruger
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

pk

pk

Posted
Posted

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well, at least everyone knows that now there is a

> personal risk of being named and shamed so it may

> be a motivation to pick up your dog's poo.



or that there's risk that an anonymous person hiding behind a keyboard will post a picture of someone that you don't and make allegations that you've got no idea whether they're true on not


I don't think that it's appropriate

KidKruger

KidKruger

Posted
  • Author
Posted

?kid krugger As you have exposed my picture which has distress me and without any proof of wrong doing just a allegation, I will seek advice for harresment and wrong doing on your part. you will be hearing from me soon?


This is bullshit.

The person in the photograph, I saw her dog shit against the tree outside the card shop while she waited for it to finish then she crossed Lordship Lane to the health shop then walked along to the betting shop which is around the time that I photographed her, at this time she stuck her head in the door of the betting shop.

I don?t need any proof because I saw her dog shit on the street and this is not a court.

After taking her photograph I went back and picked up her dog?s shit and put it in the bin for her.

What I?d appreciate at this time is a THANK YOU, not a challenge, because I was there CLEANING UP AFTER HER.

Feel free to try and find evidence of a history of my telling lies previously.

Of course I considered carefully my OP, and I?m 100% confidence in the accuracy of what I posted.

The appropriate response here is not to question my character, but to hold your hand up and admit irresponsible anti-social behaviour, apologise, then confirm you will stop it.

It?s simply not OK to line the high st in dogshit, stop trying to distract.

Jeeez, I?m not even going to charge for the doggy bag !

It happened.

You did it.

You know you did it.

I know you did it.

Stop lying.

And sort your behaviour out.

(If you are the person in the photo).

KidKruger

KidKruger

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I can understand some peoples concerns about posting photos on a public forum, but the behaviour has to stop and short of putting somebody in the stocks and throwing rotten fruit at them it isn?t going to be fixed.

If admin think there is a case for taking the photos down, fine that?s up to them.

But if I see this again I will do exactly the same.

It is not okay.

I?ve approached people before having seen their dogs foul public spaces, and they just get defensive, aggressive, and come out with some shit excuse (pun intended).

Too many people in this neighbourhood are fouling the streets and parks and those I see I will publicise if I can.

lucy123

lucy123

Posted
Posted

That's why u put my picture up, to make people follow me, you have acted inappropriate and unkind, aS I SAID, I HAVE NO RECOLLECTION OF THIS, SO YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO JUST PUT MY PICTURE UP WITHOUT ANY PHOTOGRAPHIC PROOF OF WROMG DOING! END OFF! ALSO YOU SAY IN ONE OF YOUR POST. IVE BEEN DOING IT FOR YEARS! SO NOW IT DOES FEEL PERSONAL. U SEEM VERY ANGRY IN ALL YOU POSTS.

I

I

Jules-and-Boo

Jules-and-Boo

Posted
Posted

I support KK in raising the issue and I don't believe for one minute that (he/ she) would have posted this without good reason. Perhaps the best thing would have been to ask the shop for CCTV as well.


It's a vile habit and I've witnessed people just walk away too. It's an offence and if a post like this makes people stop and think, then good.


Perhaps the best thing is to be obvious about taking photos. And maybe get the camera out sooner.


People post photos and videos on the forum frequently, of people who's behaviour is suspect.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • CPR Dave
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • HeadNun
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...