Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suspect that as soon as the election is over and

> Labour safely reelected in this constituency the

> trees will be gone.



Helen Hayes is a brilliant MP, and if she is on the case I doubt that will happen without a very good reason.


Although, this is basically a council matter, isn't it?

hpsaucey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Substance of email:

>

>

> Dear Sir/Madam

>

> Thank you for emailing us your concerns regarding

> the proposed felling of the Oak trees adjacent to

> Cox?s Walk Footbridge. We wholly understand and

> appreciate your concerns, and in light of the

> issues raised we have decided to put the planned

> works on hold in order for an independent

> consultant to undertake a further evaluation of

> possible practical alternatives to the current

> proposed works.

>

> During this time no works to the trees or the

> footbridge will take place. Local residents,

> campaigners and stakeholders will be contacted

> again in the near future to be advised on the next

> steps in the process.

>

> All of the comments that have been made to date

> will also be logged and added to the consultation

> feedback. It is intended that a fact sheet will be

> sent out in the very near future that will address

> all of the concerns raised so far. This will be

> sent to all those that have provided comments and

> is intended to ensure that everyone is aware of

> the current situation and has the same level of

> information.

>

> I would like to thank you for your interest in the

> protection of these trees.

>

> If you should have any further queries on the

> above, please contact [email protected]

> although as mentioned we will be contacting you

> again with a fact sheet.

>

>

> Regards

>

>

>

> Dale Foden

> Head of Highways (Acting)


They asked for it not to be made public.

Metallic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> hpsaucey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Substance of email: ....



> They asked for it not to be made public.


Didnt see that request on the email they sent me but will double check. I left off induvidual contact details..


HP

Metallic Wrote:

---------------------------------------------------

> They asked for it not to be made public.



> HP


Ahhh Metallic. That was the email they tried to recall. Clearer generic southwark email dont share on the resent email so i will remove although sounds like on twitter anyway. I cant delete your post quoting it however so would be grateful if you could.

HP

hpsaucey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Metallic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -

> > They asked for it not to be made public.

>

>

> > HP

>

> Ahhh Metallic. That was the email they tried to

> recall. Clearer generic southwark email dont share

> on the resent email so i will remove although

> sounds like on twitter anyway. I cant delete your

> post quoting it however so would be grateful if

> you could.

> HP


Well I did, but never mind

I bet it will have been forwarded loads of times by the many they would have had to send out.

Hey ho!

Metallic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> hpsaucey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Metallic Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -

> > > They asked for it not to be made public.

> >

> >

> > > HP

> >

> > Ahhh Metallic. That was the email they tried to

> > recall. Clearer generic southwark email dont

> share

> > on the resent email so i will remove although

> > sounds like on twitter anyway. I cant delete

> your

> > post quoting it however so would be grateful

> if

> > you could.

> > HP

>

> Well I did, but never mind

> I bet it will have been forwarded loads of times

> by the many they would have had to send out.

> Hey ho!



Lol... ta...

Anyway good news!


HP

I had the same response from one of the Southwark Arborists. It is a difficult case as the trees are newer than the bridge and they need to access under the trees for the repairs. The removal of the trees have been put on hold while they investigate further to see if there is an alternative solution.

Renata

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...