Jump to content

Recommended Posts

sunshine77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Totally incorrect. Don?t post rumour Alice, deal

> in facts



It isn't clear what post you are responding to! Nor is it clear in your subsequent posts!


The "quote this message" option is a helpful one in this respect :)

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whilst many high streets are boarded up / in

> serious decline, East Dulwich is arguing over a

> whether or not they like a mural.



It's the East Dulwich Forum.


The mural is a fair subject for discussion, I would say :)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With regards to the Mural I think enough has been

> said.

>

> Not worthy of continual discussion.



What do you consider "worthy of continual discussion", then, Dulwich Fox?


This is a forum. People discuss things on it. Like local issues. Like this one.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > With regards to the Mural I think enough has

> been

> > said.

> >

> > Not worthy of continual discussion.

>

>

> What do you consider "worthy of continual

> discussion", then, Dulwich Fox?

>

> This is a forum. People discuss things on it. Like

> local issues. Like this one.


Well As far as I am concerned I personally have no more to say on the matter.

Or do you want to make it compulsory like Voting. ?

DulwichFox Wrote:

---------------------------------------------

>

> Well As far as I am concerned I personally have no

> more to say on the matter.

> Or do you want to make it compulsory like Voting.

> ?



Eh?!


It didn't occur to you to just stop posting on the thread if you "personally" had no more to say then?


:)) :)) :))

  • 3 weeks later...

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It?s southwark CGS funded



It now (or maybe always did) says at the bottom right that it is Cleaner Greener Safer funded.


Can anybody explain to me how a painted wall is making North Cross Road cleaner, greener or safer?


And if not, how on earth did the money to paint the wall come out of this particular pot of council money?

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Got an email with all the successful CGS funding

> applications. Very interesting



Care to share it on here?!


Or post a link to where we can see these successful applications?


Because I would be extremely interested to see whether they actually meet the criteria for CGS funding (though it's a long time since I was involved in CGS projects, so possibly things have changed .....)

I'd like to know what the criteria is for CGS funding .


It all seems bonkers to me - presumably the mural is providing a "cleaner " vision of the wall ? Couldn't they just have increased the provision of cloth bags* ? We could put them over our heads, instantly removing all visual clutter and simultaneously filtering air pollution. In fact as we'd no longer be able to see anything and would be stranded at home this would reduce demand for consumer tat and traffic movement plus help the NHS by cutting demand for beds as we quietly fade away at home .


I suppose the ED Harris Academy gets ?17,000 for air purification works because they have professional advice at their fingertips and were on the ball when it came to applying .


It seems odd to me that Southwark gives money from a heavily slashed and constrained budget to a school funded by central government and having other central government revenue sources (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/school-capital-funding ) available for this type of thing .


* I'll leave it to someone else to say "what cloth bags ? " .

Oh ,whoops I haven't .

Harris got the ?17k because levels of pollution around the school are at illegal levels. Governors at the school took matters into their own hands to ensure the kids don't have to breathe such filthy air in their classrooms. It wasn't even enough: the money had to be supplemented with a sizeable chunk of cash fundraised through many events. It shouldn't be necessary to find money this way but you go through whichever door is open to you.
Though there is a precedent for a mural funded by CGS funds in Kennington, that particular wall attracted a great deal of graffiti and the painting of the mural itself was carried out as a community project. The North Cross Road Committee who applied for the funding is a consortium of independent shops and market traders and the benefit is purely commercial with no cleaner, greener and safety contribution to the community. It should not have received funding from the CGS budget.

worldwiser Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Harris got the ?17k because levels of pollution

> around the school are at illegal levels. Governors

> at the school took matters into their own hands to

> ensure the kids don't have to breathe such filthy

> air in their classrooms. It wasn't even enough:

> the money had to be supplemented with a sizeable

> chunk of cash fundraised through many events. It

> shouldn't be necessary to find money this way but

> you go through whichever door is open to you.



And then you have the whole Goose Green Tree Amigos fiasco, with a diesel generator bang next door to the children's playground- where another chunk of CGS funding was spent to increase screening from car pollution. Astonishing example of Southwark being all over the place in terms of decision making.

worldwiser - I'm aware that pupils in a school built next to a main road in London will be breathing in polluted air .


The question in my mind is why cash strapped Southwark is handing over ?17,000 when it appears that funding for capital spending on improvement is available from Central Government .

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it appears that funding for capital spending on improvement

> is available from Central Government .


There isn?t in practice anywhere near enough


In reality all (state) schools are under ever increasing financial pressures


Obviously

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years      
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
    • I see that there was a government consultation started in July 2024, a response, and then a revision to the National Planning Policy Framework, and then to the Green Belt guidance in February 2025, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/green-belt .  It includes the updates but doesn't give the nescient much clue of what was materially changed. There will probably be some good, and less good, summaries to be found. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...