Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Have you ever called someone you're losing an argument to a Nazi (online or otherwise) because you or idealogy you claim allegiance to have been intellectually intimidated into a corner with no way out, other than irrelevant accusations to distract attention away from your immediate or impending defeat?


A user called Huguenot did exactly that to me in the Obama thread. Even though the Third Reich, Hitler or the Nazis couldn't be furthered removed from the discussion at hand. Seems like he had no other choice under the circumstances. Still, it's a cowardly and pathetic direction to take. Especially if it's unfounded. I feel sorry for anyone who has to resort to such irrelevant and/or unfounded accusation.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24135-calling-someone-a-nazi/
Share on other sites

Quite right saleem, because where you said...


"African American [traditional attitudes were] overridden by the opportunity to get more for less (at the expense of hard-working Americans, regardless of colour or creed)"


Wasn't a comment on genetics at all?


Or is African American not a genetic observation?


I've possibly made a terrible terrible mistake there, and what you meant was something completely different of no genetic origin?

Yes saleem sugarplum, because that's exactly what I'm doing here is it?


You think that highlighting that your bullshit claim about black people being welfare scroungers is invented is somehow patronising the black community and making them victims?


What would you like to make up next?


Can we consider a rebuttal of any other monumental bullshit to be patronsing?


I reckon that you're an inspired social commentator, but I'm sure that you wouldn't describe anyone who defended you from that unreasonable baseless insult to be patronising, no?

Ah, okay son.


It may be that you haven't watched the video. The chap was making a point about engineered victimisation.


I didn't think that lying about blacks being welfare scroungers fell into that bracket. I thought that fell into general purpose racially motivated abuse.


My mistake.

That's a rather hypocritical claim to make for someone who chose to resort to immature circle-jerking after it dawned on them that they couldn't refute uncomfortable truths by any means other than running petty distraction. Typical of your average liberal entitlement case. I bet you camped-out in front of St. Paul's in solidarity with all the other Occupy cretins.

Hello Saleem,


Subjecting an entire post code to these outpourings is not the way to go. Seriously. Some people have suggested it's boring. They're wrong. It's car crash.


Please try and find a possibility for yourself that you're living a life that impacts others in a positive way and that fulfills you. This thing that you're doing is not big, or clever, it's screaming empty. Stop it. Hugenot has upset you. Fine. I get it. Try and be bigger than your enemies, not smaller.


GG

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years       Looks like Lucy Connolly will me one of those Reform candidates at next election tells you everything you need to know about that party and where the country would be headed 
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
    • I see that there was a government consultation started in July 2024, a response, and then a revision to the National Planning Policy Framework, and then to the Green Belt guidance in February 2025, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/green-belt .  It includes the updates but doesn't give the nescient much clue of what was materially changed. There will probably be some good, and less good, summaries to be found. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...