Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Don't get me wrong, I don't hate all young people but I can't stand the ones on The Archers. I don't know who any of them are and I couldn't care less.


Nelson Gabriel hasn't been on for ages. Black sheets on the washing line, who's doing the flowers for the church, the love that dare not speak its name AND tractors.


Now that's soap.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/
Share on other sites

John Archer was worse. The writers, to their credit, killed him off beneath the old grey Fordson.


Sadly the family sold the Fordson, so another means will have to be found to do away with the big-headed younger brother.


Bringing Walter Gabriel back could help Tom's demise. Haunted and hounded by the spirit of Walter, driven to shoot himself with a 12 bore on the very spot that his older brother was squished to death. That would learn him.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/#findComment-555866
Share on other sites

I used to watch most of the soaps at one time or other and Brookside was so funny and gritty but the Archers is the only one I stick with. The Eastenders take over of Archers was just a nasty rumour but if it ever did get as miserable as EASTENDERS I would stop listening to that too!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/#findComment-556078
Share on other sites

Kirsty, Rhys, Harry, Fallon and Freddie P are all OK but they're mostly irritating. Special mentions for Emma, who seems to be turning into her mother (Will will live to bless the day she left him), and Lily P who is seriously annoying and one suspects can only get worse. Presumably it's going to get a lot sillier now that they've got an editor who's come from Eastenders, Holby City etc. For me they've been on borrowed time since they killed off Nigel. Don't they realise that the Archers is supposed to be about the everyday life of farming folk?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/#findComment-556142
Share on other sites

Fantastic bit of Radio 4 science programme trivia for you.


When David pushed Nigel off the roof, the length of Nigel's scream could be used to calculate the height of the roof from which he fell.


Thus the Pargeter Family's stately home has a height that is somewhat greater than that of York Minster!


Which means that they have some of the longest ladders in the country.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/#findComment-556363
Share on other sites

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fantastic bit of Radio 4 science programme trivia

> for you.

>

> When David pushed Nigel off the roof, the length

> of Nigel's scream could be used to calculate the

> height of the roof from which he fell.

>

> Thus the Pargeter Family's stately home has a

> height that is somewhat greater than that of York

> Minster!

>

> Which means that they have some of the longest

> ladders in the country.


Or maybe his sweater caught a thread, thus slowing him down somewhat


Therefore reducing his velocity & prolonging the fall


Maybe


*tries to work out amount of wool required to make said sweater*

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/#findComment-556394
Share on other sites

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Fantastic bit of Radio 4 science programme

> trivia

> > for you.

> >

> > When David pushed Nigel off the roof, the

> length

> > of Nigel's scream could be used to calculate

> the

> > height of the roof from which he fell.

> >

> > Thus the Pargeter Family's stately home has a

> > height that is somewhat greater than that of

> York

> > Minster!

> >

> > Which means that they have some of the longest

> > ladders in the country.

>

> Or maybe his sweater caught a thread, thus slowing

> him down somewhat

>

> Therefore reducing his velocity & prolonging the

> fall

>

> Maybe

>

> *tries to work out amount of wool required to make

> said sweater*


Or perhaps his tweed jacket caught an updraught on the way down, creating a kind of parachute that slowed the descent?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/#findComment-556855
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The coop of Forest Hill Road is very different- cheerful and helpful staff 
    • Would you expose your young people to 'that man'? That is apparently a real question. 'That man' is in fact a retired Oxford Professor of Moral & Pastoral Theology who wrote a book setting out to provide a moral reckoning on the vexed subject of Britain's Empire and its history. What might formerly have been a purely academic matter has become highly contentious, and according to one Cambridge academic "serious shit" that needed to be CLOSED DOWN. It's all rather amazing, the stuff of satire or nightmare but not of the real world. Anyway, Lord Biggar accepted an invitation to visit Peckham and speak to and with a small audience that was due to include young Black students ... who in the end didn't come on the day! Having set the whole thing up to facilitate this encounter for them, the outcome was a disappointment. The conversation with Lord Biggar and audience was not:   
    • Entertaining a visitor from Philippines, she's been here before but I've promised lunch.  Somewhere a little different maybe, quirky?
    • Surely a very simple: "how much does the council receive from the organisers of the Gala festival for payment for use of Peckham Rye" would smoke out a response. The "commercial sensitivity" could be because the council are giving it away or it could be because Gala don't want others to know how much they are paying - it is really tough to make money from any type of festival these days and Wide Awake in Brockwell, for example, sent out a plea for people to buy tickets via a reduced price "Tell a Friend" special offer because (they said much of it linked to the problems Lambeth were having with the High Court) things were entering "squeaky bum time"  and they were struggling to hit their break-even point. It does make me wonder whether expansion is baked-in to the agreements the council has with the organisers for events like Gala as the organisers have to be able to scale the size of the event each year to try to make money. I do also how much of the "revenue" from these events might be swallowed up by the provision of the "free community" event element of them. The comment piece in the Guardian sums it up quite nicely: The heart of this issue seems to be how cash-strapped councils are becoming increasingly beholden to commercial interests to the detriment of the public. A weekend festival that welcomes 50,000 people can expect to raise about £500,000 for local authorities. Councils argue that this money goes back in the public purse, allowing them to continue funding free community events such as Lambeth’s beloved Country Show, though there doesn’t seem to be much transparency over exactly how much cash is raised or where it is allocated.   The issue for councils may well be that if people found out how much was actually being raised by these events that the community would say the disruption is not worth it and I do wonder how much of the revenue is being swallowed up by the provision of the "free event" using the same infrastructure. Any time a council doesn't want to share something openly very much suggests that it is because they think constituents won't like the answer.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...