Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Don't get me wrong, I don't hate all young people but I can't stand the ones on The Archers. I don't know who any of them are and I couldn't care less.


Nelson Gabriel hasn't been on for ages. Black sheets on the washing line, who's doing the flowers for the church, the love that dare not speak its name AND tractors.


Now that's soap.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/
Share on other sites

John Archer was worse. The writers, to their credit, killed him off beneath the old grey Fordson.


Sadly the family sold the Fordson, so another means will have to be found to do away with the big-headed younger brother.


Bringing Walter Gabriel back could help Tom's demise. Haunted and hounded by the spirit of Walter, driven to shoot himself with a 12 bore on the very spot that his older brother was squished to death. That would learn him.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/#findComment-555866
Share on other sites

I used to watch most of the soaps at one time or other and Brookside was so funny and gritty but the Archers is the only one I stick with. The Eastenders take over of Archers was just a nasty rumour but if it ever did get as miserable as EASTENDERS I would stop listening to that too!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/#findComment-556078
Share on other sites

Kirsty, Rhys, Harry, Fallon and Freddie P are all OK but they're mostly irritating. Special mentions for Emma, who seems to be turning into her mother (Will will live to bless the day she left him), and Lily P who is seriously annoying and one suspects can only get worse. Presumably it's going to get a lot sillier now that they've got an editor who's come from Eastenders, Holby City etc. For me they've been on borrowed time since they killed off Nigel. Don't they realise that the Archers is supposed to be about the everyday life of farming folk?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/#findComment-556142
Share on other sites

Fantastic bit of Radio 4 science programme trivia for you.


When David pushed Nigel off the roof, the length of Nigel's scream could be used to calculate the height of the roof from which he fell.


Thus the Pargeter Family's stately home has a height that is somewhat greater than that of York Minster!


Which means that they have some of the longest ladders in the country.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/#findComment-556363
Share on other sites

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fantastic bit of Radio 4 science programme trivia

> for you.

>

> When David pushed Nigel off the roof, the length

> of Nigel's scream could be used to calculate the

> height of the roof from which he fell.

>

> Thus the Pargeter Family's stately home has a

> height that is somewhat greater than that of York

> Minster!

>

> Which means that they have some of the longest

> ladders in the country.


Or maybe his sweater caught a thread, thus slowing him down somewhat


Therefore reducing his velocity & prolonging the fall


Maybe


*tries to work out amount of wool required to make said sweater*

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/#findComment-556394
Share on other sites

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Fantastic bit of Radio 4 science programme

> trivia

> > for you.

> >

> > When David pushed Nigel off the roof, the

> length

> > of Nigel's scream could be used to calculate

> the

> > height of the roof from which he fell.

> >

> > Thus the Pargeter Family's stately home has a

> > height that is somewhat greater than that of

> York

> > Minster!

> >

> > Which means that they have some of the longest

> > ladders in the country.

>

> Or maybe his sweater caught a thread, thus slowing

> him down somewhat

>

> Therefore reducing his velocity & prolonging the

> fall

>

> Maybe

>

> *tries to work out amount of wool required to make

> said sweater*


Or perhaps his tweed jacket caught an updraught on the way down, creating a kind of parachute that slowed the descent?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24178-the-archers/#findComment-556855
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...