Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I bought something in Oliver Bonas yesterday and the sales assistant asked me if I wanted my receipt emailed to me. I declined, but when offered a paper receipt, I said yes please in case I need a refund. The Sales assistant then told me I wouldn?t be eligible for a refund with a paper receipt, only an exchange would be allowed. If however, I had opted for the email receipt, I would have been eligible for the refund. So, I changed my mind and asked to have the receipt emailed to me, but at that point, the sales assistant said it was too late, she?d already pressed the button! I know an email receipt is more environmentally friendly, but I declined having it wrapped in tissue and having a bag to put it in. What about consumer rights? Seems unfair to me.

Your consumer rights are unchanged as regarding the receipt medium. You have absolute rights of refund in specific circumstances (the item being damaged, not fit for purpose etc.). In other circumstances there may option only for an exchange - but not if you have made refund a condition of sale (i.e if you say that you need to check the item's colour for match against something else, and will make the purchase only on the condition that you can get a refund if the colour doesn't match). If that is accepted by the sales assistant (who isn't obliged to accept it) it forms part of the sales contract, although proving and enforcing it (without e.g. a witness to the transaction) may prove more difficult.


Basically, the assistant was talking rubbish - save where a digital receipt would give a refund under any circumstances, rather than just those outlined in law. But that was not made clear to you.

I think the advantage to the business is having your contact details on file, they can then send you any marketing and promotional material. Your details are very valuable to them. Your consumer rights are in no way affected by not having an e-receipt.

If you simply don't like the item ie you changed your mind then you have no legal rights.


If it is "not of merchantable quality" then you are entitled to a refund within one month or to a repair or replacement after that.


There may be something in their T&Cs which says that if you simply change your mind they will be more co-operative if you have an email receipt. Otherwise your legal rights are unaffected.


when you give your email address for a receipt you can say that you do not wish to receive anything else or to be kept on their database. They should not use the address for marketing to you and if they do you should be able to remove your name from their lists. That's GDPR

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
    • I agree about the site and buying another one, but I was responding to a query about the old site. Which was no longer fit for purpose. Selling that and not buying another locally was just money for old rope for the foreign owners, as was moving the DO to an unsuitable building too far away. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...