Jump to content

Noise from disintegrating drain cover on Barry Road


Recommended Posts

Hello,


We live in the 150-170 Barry Road stretch. There is a broken Drain cover in the road opposite probably 159 Barry road and every time a car passes over it there is a double impact bang (one for each wheel. The buses make a spectacular noise.


This noise travels down the drains somehow and is transmitting up into our bedroom (ground floor) a good 50m down the road! Does anyone know the methodology to contact the council to try and get this fixed. I'm usually a good sleeper but there is something about the irregularity of these thuds that is killing me!


Any help would be much appreciated! Am gonna try and sort it with a wedge and a hammer as an interim!


Cheers


Rog

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I report them to Thames Water https://www2.thameswater.co.uk/leak/


Enter your postcode and you will be taken to a page where you can report noisy manhole covers .


In a road like Barry Road Thames Water will say they have to liaise with Southwark about directing traffic . Then after many many months cones will appear and signs indicating that Thames Water will be working .


Nothing will happen and the cones will be removed .


After many many months a few shovel fulls of tarmac will be thrown over the manhole cover from a passing truck .


Sometimes the tarmac will set and remain on the cover deadening the noise . More often , as passing traffic drives over the soft tarmac it will be broken up and spread across the road .At which point you start over with Thames Water .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contact Thames Water on Twitter too - I went on a one person campaign over the man hole cover outside 140 Barry Road because it was so loud, so dangerous for drivers and was continuously getting covered in ineffective tarmac that broke apart in days. I explained this to Thames Water over and over and over again via email, phone call and Twitter. Twitter was were I got the quickest responses...but it still took from May to December for it to be properly replaced at which point the noise stopped. These just happened to be the months I was desperately trying to get any uninterrupted sleep I could as I had a small baby. Good luck!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi

I also was reporting the displaced manhole cover near to 142 Barry Rd

The first thing is to report it to Southwark Environmental Health saying it is effecting your health the will pass onto highways department who will then pass onto Thames Water (as it is a TW asset) - you may need to chase them on a regular basis (Southwark may do some temporary tarmac repairs in the interim)

At the same time phone Thames water your self and tell them you have reported the issue to Southwark Environmental Health this will get the cogs moving

It took the best part of 3 months for them to repair the man hole cover as they need to get a licence to close off part of the road


Good luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it seemed to do the trick having a two pronged attack

Initially it is an environmental health issue as when you are near to a noise issue that effects your sleep and your health the Environmental health (EH) department have to do something about it (in this case they could not replace the MH cover but they got southwark highways to tarmac over the displaced cover until TW could make a more permanent repair

Also it holds more clout when you report to TWs site that you have raised this to EH

I had several call backs from TW explaining what they were doing to rectify the problem

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a similar issue with one outside our house, near the junction with Silvester Road. i reported it via here: https://www.fixmystreet.com


It took a long time for it to get fully fixed, all the things that IntexasATM mentioned had to happen first, but it's been fine for a good few months now (actually since January, just checked!), so do persevere!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • LTNs were pushed by the Conservative government (as was ULEZ which you also disapprove of). They were one of several active travel measures which were a condition of the TFL funding settlement post Covid.  £69m of direct borough funding (per year) was also provided to support more localised investment in walking and cycling schemes across the city…but we all know schnapps is a secret commie 🤣 I’ve no idea. I do know that people are covering their plates and driving through, and that’s probably an accident waiting to happen (although clearly down to signage 🤣). The emergency services have agreed the changes, so I would assume that on balance they think it’s the right move. Whilst ‘One’ are suggesting the emergency services have agreed the changes under pressure, they wont say what sort of pressure, or from who 🤔. Perhaps it’s the commies again 🤣😂
    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...