Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all,


We've just (I think!) been offered a place for our 3.5 year old son to go to Goose Green Nursery School from September. We actually live on the Nunhead side of Peckham Rye Park, but were unable to get into our nearest local school nursery due to all the places being allocated to siblings.


In a ridiculously naive way, I had been imagining and wanting him to go to his local pre-school attached to the primary school he would then go to, in terms of developing friendships and familiarity with the school. However, it seems definite that unless Ivydale has another bulge class for 2013, we won't get in there, and it has been suggested we look at Goose Green - hence applying for the nursery there. I would have thought we would have been well out of catchment for primary though, but reading all the glowing reports on the forum about it, if we did get in, it seems a great option.


Our son is currently at a private nursery 2 days a week and I guess I'm worried about shifting him about too much, particularly if he hasn't really got much chance of getting into the school itself, and so was wanting to hear feedback about peoples experience of the nursery itself, to see if it was largely positive and worth the potential disruption for. Many thanks in advance.

My daughter went to GG nursery and loved it as did I. It is a great mix of learning and fun in a well resourced setting with a fab outdoor space. She was very well prepared for big school socially and academically in a way that my elder child who had been in a private nursery had not been. The new head of nursery is an existing member of the teaching staff and will be utterly brilliant. She will be supported by experienced staff who have been at the nursery for years.

I completely understand the desire to see your child progress from nursery to reception in the same school and frustrating that it is impossible to know in advance if that is achievable. All I can say is that there are quite a few happy parents in reception who cross the Rye from Nunhead in reception and upper years so you would been in catchment this year but as the popularity of the school increases that may shrink, albeit offset by increasing popularity of other Good schools. Looks like you may be more likely to get into GG than Ivydale if there is a big sibling intake in the latter.

Only you can know if it is worth the risk that you may not get into the school, go with your instinct.

My daughter also went to GG nursery. We loved it. It has a lovely atmosphere and the staff were great. She thrived there and still sees her friends she made there. We moved onto a different prmary school but we all still miss Goose Green. You are very lucky to have a place there in my opinion!
My son is currently at Goose Green nursery but will be moving to St John's and St Clement's in September as his older brother is there (and it's closer to us!). I moved my son from a private nursery to Goose Green knowing he would then be moving to St John's for reception but I figured it was worth it as I was so impressed with the nursery and had heard so many good things about it. It has certainly lived up to it's reputation - it's a really lovely nursery - great activities, good staff and a lovely outdoor space. My son will certainly miss it when he moves to St John's in September. I would say go for it!

I would say go for the place at GG. They have just got a Good from Ofsted with Outstanding in leadership etc.


It seems that some parents use GG nursery and then move on to different reception class schools in the area. Judging by their comments their children were happy at GG.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...