Jump to content

Recommendation for boiler engineer Mark Newlove


Tom-C

Recommended Posts

I wanted to post a personal recommendation for Mark Newlove of NewGas Boilers. I have three properties. I had one boiler that initially needed installing in a different place to the old one, with the idea in the back of my head that I might replace the other two at some point for simplicity of maintenance. After Mark and his colleague had completed the first one I was so impressed with their work that I got him to do the other two. Im in the building game and can recognise someone who knows what they are talking about and carry out neat and professional work. He is obviously a bright and very experienced man which is what you need when either you are having an installation or need a bit of problem solving because a well maintained and well installed boiler will save you money in the long run. On top of that he is reasonable, punctual and reliable and Mark will be servicing and carrying out my gas safety checks for years to come I hope.


Mark Newlove: 07971824567

  • 4 weeks later...

Another recommendation for Mark Newlove


I first used him last year based on all the positive recommendations on EDF and he is my go to man now. He has just done my annual landlord safety check and fixed the diverter valve diaphragm at a reasonable price and he fitted me in at short notice, which was great as my tenants has no hot water. Knows his trade, highly recommended.


Mark Newlove: 07971824567

  • 9 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...