Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There's plenty of evidence that smaller birds are getting used to parakeets and don't see them as a threat. In fact, the perceived threat comes from them having curved beaks ? which most birds will see initially as meaning a potentially dangerous bird of prey.

Soon to be in Fitzgeraldo's garden!


ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> bcam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Perfect solution attached. This should cut out

> all

> > noise with the living world.

> > Enjoy!

> > Attachments:

> 52645dbd6b07151d48d48cdbb64a17a9.jpg (507.9KB)

>

> What and where is this?

exdulwicher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I thought robins were territorial?

>

> Only with other robins. They're fine sharing

> feeders with tits, nuthatches, woodpeckers,

> finches etc.



Yes, it was the reference to "lots of robins" in the post above mine that I was referring to.


I suspect it is the same robin visiting many times :)

Just a suggestion to the OP, but you can buy mock-ups of birds of prey to hang in your garden. Preferably move them around, otherwise the birds might smell a rat.


No idea if it would see off the parakeets, but it would probably empty your garden of any other bird who might otherwise disturb you with its singing :)

I was wondering whether trained predators, ferrets perhaps or similar creatures might be dispatched to the tree-tops in the hope that they might disturb the nesting birds, eat their eggs/young (along with possibly the nesting parents-to-be themselves) and thus solve the problem?

Fitzgeraldo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was wondering whether trained predators, ferrets

> perhaps or similar creatures might be dispatched

> to the tree-tops in the hope that they might

> disturb the nesting birds, eat their eggs/young

> (along with possibly the nesting parents-to-be

> themselves) and thus solve the problem?




Now I know your first post wasn't serious. And if this second post is, it would still be against the law - see my earlier post.

You?re either a troll or a really mean-spirited animal abuser.

Your wacky-races bonkers and frankly sick solution to kill baby birds is against the law.


Why don?t you move to a concrete high rise instead of unnaturally focussing on killing animals? Or just get over your fixation. Go for a walk. Flagellate yourself with a horse hair vest and cat-o-nine tails. Take your mind off Parakeets.



Fitzgeraldo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was wondering whether trained predators, ferrets

> perhaps or similar creatures might be dispatched

> to the tree-tops in the hope that they might

> disturb the nesting birds, eat their eggs/young

> (along with possibly the nesting parents-to-be

> themselves) and thus solve the problem?

Fitzgeraldo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was wondering whether trained predators, ferrets

> perhaps or similar creatures might be dispatched

> to the tree-tops in the hope that they might

> disturb the nesting birds, eat their eggs/young

> (along with possibly the nesting parents-to-be

> themselves) and thus solve the problem?


Or maybe just some ear muffs :)

Actually Americans hate Starlings which were introduced from the UK (LOL take that Trump) but even the Americans fully loaded can't get rid of them so as the Parakeets seem harmless I guess leave them be.


https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-invasive-species-we-can-blame-on-shakespeare-95506437/


"People quickly realized what a pest these birds could be and tried to get rid of them. In Hartford, Connecticut, in 1914, residents tried to scare the birds away from their nests by fastening teddy bears to those trees and firing rockets through the branches. The White House tried speakers that emitted owl calls. Columns around the U.S. Capitol were outfitted with electrified wires. People have tried shooting, poisoning, trapping, repelling and frightening the birds, but the population still grows. They have plenty to eat and lots of habitat to live on?what else does a species need?"

Bloody green squawky things - stay out of my garden damn you. Black and pied squawky things are fine.


Guardian has an article on them as pests so surprised this isn't echoed more on this thread.


Informed (if wordy) (RSPB) view: The RSPB is not in favour of a cull of parakeets at this time, but believes it is important that the spread of the ring-necked parakeet is monitored and its potential for negative impacts on our native bird species assessed.


The government is obliged to ensure that non-native species do not adversely affect native wildlife and has developed a policy framework for addressing the possible risks associated with such species becoming established. This includes the production of evidence-based risk assessments of non-native species already in, or likely to reach, Great Britain. Decisions on the type of action necessary is based on the outcome of these risk assessments.


Ring-necked parakeets, like all birds living in the wild in the UK, are protected by law. The species can be controlled under licence in England, but only in isolated cases where the birds pose a serious threat to conservation of a native species, are causing serious damage to crops, or for air safety purposes.

The only "vermin" here, Fitzgeraldo, is you. If you spent less time living in your cosy little bubble & had any clue about the horrors other countries are currently facing, you wouldn't have posted this insensitive drivel to begin with.


You do realise people are risking & losing their lives to save animals - many on the brink of extinction - in Australia's bushfires right now? Does your situation compare?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...