Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There's plenty of evidence that smaller birds are getting used to parakeets and don't see them as a threat. In fact, the perceived threat comes from them having curved beaks ? which most birds will see initially as meaning a potentially dangerous bird of prey.

Soon to be in Fitzgeraldo's garden!


ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> bcam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Perfect solution attached. This should cut out

> all

> > noise with the living world.

> > Enjoy!

> > Attachments:

> 52645dbd6b07151d48d48cdbb64a17a9.jpg (507.9KB)

>

> What and where is this?

exdulwicher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I thought robins were territorial?

>

> Only with other robins. They're fine sharing

> feeders with tits, nuthatches, woodpeckers,

> finches etc.



Yes, it was the reference to "lots of robins" in the post above mine that I was referring to.


I suspect it is the same robin visiting many times :)

Just a suggestion to the OP, but you can buy mock-ups of birds of prey to hang in your garden. Preferably move them around, otherwise the birds might smell a rat.


No idea if it would see off the parakeets, but it would probably empty your garden of any other bird who might otherwise disturb you with its singing :)

I was wondering whether trained predators, ferrets perhaps or similar creatures might be dispatched to the tree-tops in the hope that they might disturb the nesting birds, eat their eggs/young (along with possibly the nesting parents-to-be themselves) and thus solve the problem?

Fitzgeraldo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was wondering whether trained predators, ferrets

> perhaps or similar creatures might be dispatched

> to the tree-tops in the hope that they might

> disturb the nesting birds, eat their eggs/young

> (along with possibly the nesting parents-to-be

> themselves) and thus solve the problem?




Now I know your first post wasn't serious. And if this second post is, it would still be against the law - see my earlier post.

You?re either a troll or a really mean-spirited animal abuser.

Your wacky-races bonkers and frankly sick solution to kill baby birds is against the law.


Why don?t you move to a concrete high rise instead of unnaturally focussing on killing animals? Or just get over your fixation. Go for a walk. Flagellate yourself with a horse hair vest and cat-o-nine tails. Take your mind off Parakeets.



Fitzgeraldo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was wondering whether trained predators, ferrets

> perhaps or similar creatures might be dispatched

> to the tree-tops in the hope that they might

> disturb the nesting birds, eat their eggs/young

> (along with possibly the nesting parents-to-be

> themselves) and thus solve the problem?

Fitzgeraldo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was wondering whether trained predators, ferrets

> perhaps or similar creatures might be dispatched

> to the tree-tops in the hope that they might

> disturb the nesting birds, eat their eggs/young

> (along with possibly the nesting parents-to-be

> themselves) and thus solve the problem?


Or maybe just some ear muffs :)

Actually Americans hate Starlings which were introduced from the UK (LOL take that Trump) but even the Americans fully loaded can't get rid of them so as the Parakeets seem harmless I guess leave them be.


https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-invasive-species-we-can-blame-on-shakespeare-95506437/


"People quickly realized what a pest these birds could be and tried to get rid of them. In Hartford, Connecticut, in 1914, residents tried to scare the birds away from their nests by fastening teddy bears to those trees and firing rockets through the branches. The White House tried speakers that emitted owl calls. Columns around the U.S. Capitol were outfitted with electrified wires. People have tried shooting, poisoning, trapping, repelling and frightening the birds, but the population still grows. They have plenty to eat and lots of habitat to live on?what else does a species need?"

Bloody green squawky things - stay out of my garden damn you. Black and pied squawky things are fine.


Guardian has an article on them as pests so surprised this isn't echoed more on this thread.


Informed (if wordy) (RSPB) view: The RSPB is not in favour of a cull of parakeets at this time, but believes it is important that the spread of the ring-necked parakeet is monitored and its potential for negative impacts on our native bird species assessed.


The government is obliged to ensure that non-native species do not adversely affect native wildlife and has developed a policy framework for addressing the possible risks associated with such species becoming established. This includes the production of evidence-based risk assessments of non-native species already in, or likely to reach, Great Britain. Decisions on the type of action necessary is based on the outcome of these risk assessments.


Ring-necked parakeets, like all birds living in the wild in the UK, are protected by law. The species can be controlled under licence in England, but only in isolated cases where the birds pose a serious threat to conservation of a native species, are causing serious damage to crops, or for air safety purposes.

The only "vermin" here, Fitzgeraldo, is you. If you spent less time living in your cosy little bubble & had any clue about the horrors other countries are currently facing, you wouldn't have posted this insensitive drivel to begin with.


You do realise people are risking & losing their lives to save animals - many on the brink of extinction - in Australia's bushfires right now? Does your situation compare?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...