Jump to content

Recommended Posts

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wait, Hitler had a son???

>

> Has Yesterday been told?

>

> Is he in hiding, biding his time til he stakes his

> claim for world domination? But organising flames

> on the side?


Yeah, if you are going to post something with Hitler in the title at least get the spelling of the word preceding it correct.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, without him, there would be no "Hitler's

> Bodyguard", and Yesterday would go out of

> business.



Not forgetting, there'd be no Godwin's Law either


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ahem, Jeremy. Two posts above yours..?


Ah, OK! Sorry, the "Hitler's Bodyguard" reference didn't ring any bells, and I didn't realise that "Yesterday" was The Yesterday Channel. I guess I don't watch a lot of TV...

Yeah, I find that whenever I'm ill, and have soup on the sofa and think a bit of Yesterday would be just the ticket (there's always some 6-hour Catherine Cookson thing on with Catherine Zeta Jones and people you recognise from award-winning, critically-acclaimed BBC dramas), I find that in fact, there IS no Catherine Cookson.


Only Hitler's Bodyguard on an endless bloody loop. I swear they must play it at least twice a day. (stil haven't watched it though)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I will buy you a frothy coffee from anywhere you like on Lordship Lane if that happens. Most of these costs never get recovered from the drivers that caused them. The photo shows a car that's been left on the zigzags protecting the crossing. Pedestrians crossing East to West and drivers heading South won't see each other until the pedestrians are in the road. That is a dangerous position to leave a car in. (I don't know if it's stil there, obviously).
    • Seems a pretty dangerous position to me - apart from getting in the way of pedestrians trying to cross the road large vehicles heading south have to edge into the oncoming traffic lane to get past. I've got a normal-sized car and had to squeeze through a gap the other day.  
    • When a car is left damaged by the road-side it may be that the insurer is tasked with recovering the vehicle to assess it and (possibly) take it for repair. Only if it is in a dangerous position will the police recover it - which saves money for the tax-payer.  You may also have some recovery options with e.g. the AA (other organisations are available). Were the car to have been stolen or abandoned then it will take some time to sort this out, and again unless the vehicle is in a dangerous position the police won't be rushing to deal with that. Not sure who the 'they' are in this case.
    • I wouldn't like to speculate, Sue. Not my thing. Teddy Boy is your man on the ground for that sort of first-hand detail. It's six points for driving without insurance and six points for using a phone, so that's an automatic ban of at least six months. They're going to be practically uninsurable for a considerable period after that. So, nobody's hurt, a clearly crap driver is off the road for some time and the good burghers of SE22 get a lovely, shiny new post - probably paid for by the driver. Every cloud, and that. If only Franklins wasn't changing hands, Lordship Lane would be almost perfect.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...