Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi All,


I know there have been a number of threads on this but I was wondering whether anyone could help me on this?


We bought our house back in 2008 and we have been with Halifax for building and contents insurance. However, I received their renewal notice and it?s ?1,400 for a four bedroom Victorian mid terrace house! I have subsequently looked at price comparison website and it looks like we can get the premium substantially lower if I ticked ?no sign of subsidence? box.


According to the building structural survey done back in 2008, ?There is some evidence of previous movement with cracking around some window openings along with minor sagging to the roof structure, slight twisting to the parapet walls, distortion to window openings and the front bay, uneven stone window cills, distortion to brick arches, gaps around window frames, as well as some cracking to the rear elevation around the rear door, some cracking internally to the rear elevation within the kitchen (and at some wall junctions) and slight sloping to most timber flooring. These cracks are old and worn and not reflected by any corresponding internal movement. The extent of the movement is within acceptable limits for a property of this type and age and there is no evidence of any recent or continuing movement. Some of the cracking appears to be typical of minor seasonal movement?.


When I called a number of insurers and declare this, none of them would insure our house!


So question is, do I tick the ? no sign of subsidence? box and get a cheaper insurance or do I have to stay with Halifax?


Any advices would be really appreciated?.


Thank you!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24669-help-home-insurance/
Share on other sites

My insurance is with the Halifax too. I don't want to switch because I want the continuity (the property has been continuously insured with the Halifax for 14 years).


Every Spring when I get my renewal notice I phone up the Halifax and have a conversation that goes something like "how much, you're having a laugh; I'm taking my business away and going somewhere else". The price gets instantly slashed and I stay with the Halifax for another year.


Loyalty doesn't pay with utilities and such; you have to keep threatening to leave or you won't get a reasonable quote.


Don't tell lies to your insurer.

we too have stayed with the Halifax for over 30 years as houses each side of me have had subsidence and although we do not have any (touch wood) Barry Road with all it's trees is a 'high risk area'. Our neighbour had trouble getting his insurance to pay out several thousands of pounds in costs and took him a good 6 - 9 months and he was a solicitor. I think we have to pay the first ?1000 of any claim, if we changed we would need to pay ?3 - ?5 K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...