Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone else noticed that Dulwich Square is fast becoming a skate park.....am I the only one to think that this might test the community minded spirit of some of the Square's most vocal supporters.....?;-)


I wonder how long it will be before the signs get changed to...Open To....bikes, pedestrians, buggies, scooters (but not stunt scooters or skateboards)

Dulwich Square? Never heard of it :-) But yes, I have noticed the skate boarders at teh closed off DV junction.

Personally I think it is much healthier and nicer for the kids there than on the old Harvester site next to the South Circular. Definitely to be encouraged.

The hated name, Dulwich Square, has had photos of snow and children playing in it, do people not realise this is still an open junction? I'm surprised there haven't been any cycle/pedestrian accidents, or maybe they are being unpublicised to help the LTN supporters create an idyllic vision?

Rocks - really sad with your sentiment - Covid has been a massive catalyst for modal shifts in transportation but soon, hopefully, things will begin to return to some semblance of normality and those modal shifts will swing back when people's world's begin extending.


I expect that no amount of bleeding heart ice caps melting stuff will change your view. Hopefully others will have a different approach to travel, and reduce car use, in a post lockdown world. It's a joy to see so many people out in or parks. Let's celebrate it.


Here's some reading about how obese we are as a nation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obesity_in_the_United_Kingdom

@malumbu there was that report a few years ago that showed people in dulwich already made mmost short journeys on foot. cycling about average, but walking much higher. Public transport lower than average because the service isnt good round here. P4 should be more reliable.

@malumbu - good try, no cigar I am afraid....it's clear all I was hoping for was a return to some semblance of normality in relation to Covid - not traffic levels.


I refer you to my earlier point...


@Malumbu

Your increasingly spiteful de-positioning of anyone who has a view differing to your own on this subject speaks volumes: it suggests you don't have a valuable contribution or rational argument for the points being raised so have descended to name calling and accusatory finger pointing at people you don't know anything about. A bit childish don't you think?

Agree with your Rockets; and this person doesn't even live in Southwark, let alone Dulwich so not sure why he/she is so active on this forum.


Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @malumbu - good try, no cigar I am afraid....it's

> clear all I was hoping for was a return to some

> semblance of normality in relation to Covid - not

> traffic levels.

>

> I refer you to my earlier point...

>

> @Malumbu

> Your increasingly spiteful de-positioning of

> anyone who has a view differing to your own on

> this subject speaks volumes: it suggests you don't

> have a valuable contribution or rational argument

> for the points being raised so have descended to

> name calling and accusatory finger pointing at

> people you don't know anything about. A bit

> childish don't you think?

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As an aside, does anyone know who is behind all the ?one? campaigns? They seem to be connected and

> I would be very surprised if there wasn?t some astroturfing going on frankly.


You can check out the number and location of One Dulwich supporters on their web site her https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters


Can you provide the same for SOutwark Cyclists, or Clean Air Dulwich ?

As an aside, does anyone know who is behind all the ?one? campaigns? They seem to be connected and I would be very surprised if there wasn?t some astroturfing going on frankly.


A very opaque mix of LDTA, UKIP, various twitter bots and pro-driving campaigns like FairFuel UK and The ABD. Because issues like LTNs have becomes so politically divisive, it's become a very easy target for right-wing campaign groups that find it easy to pick on populist issues.


Plus a genuine mix of local residents, many of whom will think it's purely a local group started by local residents with concerns.


If you delve deeply enough into the Twitter feeds of them you can find the key accounts that follow them all, retweet them and contribute to them; it's usually only a dozen or so people behind them all plus some bots. The wording on the "about us" gives it away, it's virtually identical across the board even for groups outside London. Apolitical, members from all walks of life, holistic solutions... It's almost word-for-word.


There's a reference in this article about the overall secrecy behind the One... groups (this one specific to One Oval)

https://www.brixtonbuzz.com/2020/08/save-oval-streets-hits-back-at-oneovals-misleading-information-about-emergency-access-to-the-the-oval-triangle-ltn/

I wouldn?t read too much into the ?about us? clue - more likely that a local group has cut and pasted the wording from a website it?s seen. When e-commerce first became a thing, copying website terms and privacy notices from existing websites was rife amongst small / independent traders...

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I guess Ex Duliwch 's cycling helmet is made out

> of tinfoil



Lol


Now I've got that image in my head as he cycles furiously to avoid being "taken" for an Anal probe covid test


Sorry ex , merging the image and another thread in my imagination ...

I sense rebellion is in the air, but thought it would be worth reflecting on previous campaigns. Generally mass protest makes very little difference - Gulf War 2, Greenham, road protests and the like. Poll tax would have been scrapped in any case so that didn't need mass civil disobedience. Even the 'right to roam' took two generations to come to fruition. https://www.ramblers.org.uk/get-involved/campaign-with-us/past-campaigns/right-to-roam-crow.aspx


Sadly the campaigns that had the most effect have been most detrimental to our environment and a move away from the car, the fuel protest (unholy alliance between hauliers and farmers) and the petition against road user charging. Blair's government and those since are afraid to demonise drivers which means local authorities have to do the dirty work.


Two more interesting articles about protest: https://www.transporttimes.co.uk/news.php/Can-National-Road-Pricing-Survive-Real-Politics-604/?utm_source=Transport+Times&utm_campaign=09c31d1fa4-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_10_30_11_03_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c0cafa3f39-09c31d1fa4-250793593 about road pricing, and https://www.plutobooks.com/9780745340593/roads-runways-and-resistance/?utm_source=Transport+Times&utm_campaign=09c31d1fa4-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_10_30_11_03_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c0cafa3f39-09c31d1fa4-250793593

Local authorities are making such a pig's ear of these measures that they are turning the majority against them so you can scratch them off the "dirty work" list from here on in I suspect. This is going to cost votes and that, ultimately, is what decides the fate of any idea or plan. Those councillors who were the loudest advocates of the LTNs seem to have lost their voice over the last couple of months and don't seem to keen to grandstand over Dulwich Square and other areas - that is very telling. Even chief LTN advocate in chief Peter Walker seems to have moved on to other things.

Malumbu - let's back up a little. What point are you trying to land with those links? One is a potted history of the Rambler's Association right to roam battle, one is an article on road usage (that I agree with entirely) and one is a link to a book. Are you not meandering a bit off-topic here - this thread is on Our Healthy Streets so I am not sure what point you are trying to make - there's a perfectly good debate (one which you fervently try to engage with but other than name-calling never actually do) here - you seem obsessed with trying to take the conversation away from the subject in hand.


And on the subject of name-calling you're doing it again and descending into your usual dismissive de-positioning stance referring to "educating yourself". By default that suggests you don't think I am educated.

I knew the petition was on the agenda, but didn't tune in to watch - I suspected it would be noted and some sort of comment made about an upcoming review. Did anyone attend/ see it? Looks like the meeting is on youtube https://www.youtube.com/user/southwarkcouncil
Worth watching the youtube clip. Think it's worth keeping a close eye on the process, seems the commonspace responses are less important now that they oppose the scheme: the councillor response seemed very scripted. There will be some sort of "targeted" survey of residents' experience and perception to be included, amongst other things, and safety rather than active transport looks like the new focus. (Seen through my own prism - watch it yourself, like everyone I come to it with my own biases).
As a pedestrian I spend half my time having to walk in the road. There is so little room for those on foot or on bike. You look up and down most streets and can see how much space is given over to car storage and car lanes. Cars are literally everywhere. I can?t understand who thinks that too much space is being allocated to cycling and walking and not enough to motor vehicles.

That certainly was 'through your own prism' Legalalien!


Having watched the replay of cllr Rose's comments, I don't think that the takeaway from her comments was that 'the commonplace is less important now the comments oppose the scheme' - rather that it is a tool that reflects comments from people at a point in time and that some will reflect particular one off issues or things that have since been addressed, other will be more constant concerns and so it is raises issues that should be considered in the Council's review.


I suspect that her comments were framed in relation to the frankly laughable way that the Dulwich Alliance 'study' has tried to use the data to infer an overall approval rating for the scheme! No one can tell whether 10 people left one comment, or one person left 10 (and that's just one of many issues with the conclusions reached) so attempts to use the data in this way are at best the equivalent of an amateurish school project or at worst a disingenuous attempt to manipulate to support their group aims!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...