Jump to content

Recommended Posts

it will flash back to burn the fingers of @SouthwarkLabour.


I doubt it. The 'fury' you read about in these pages represents only a small number of the electorate. There would need to be very clear campaigning around a single issue to make any difference, and it is most unlikely that sufficient non Labour and non Lib-Dem votes - for just one candidate, to succeed - could be mustered. Lib Dems broadly support Labour as regards being anti-car (that's anti private car ownership, a stated Labour policy).


You need a cause as big as Independence (vide The Scots Nats defeat of incumbent and entrenched Labour party 'couldn't give a damn about the electorate' local and national politicians) to make any difference.


Southwark is not a 'swing' council in that way. At least, not about a car issue.

Well, it does make sense. Having blocked off part of MG to traffic the last thing you want is nasty, polluting school coaches damaging children's lungs at the school entrance. Better to send them onto a main road and increase pollution there and it will also teach those drivers commuting through to work a jolly good lesson...how dare they pollute the local area with their fumes and damage children's lungs, don't they know there's a school there.
All 3 with engines on......idling for over 30mins. For LTN supporters..when it suits ED Grove is a main transit road, so no stopping allowed, other times it is a school road so coaches can stop and idle on a double yellow. As long as the nice houses, with nice gardens and nice people can have peace and quiet and NOx levels below 20 then that?s all that matters. Who cares if the independent measurement of NOx and traffic on ED Grove as measured by the not so independent council have both increased by at least 25% since the gated communities got what they wanted....

Assume these are a one off coach for something related to Charter? It isn't ok for them to leave engines idling - have you contacted the school about this? Assume they're for a trip or a fixture or something as they obviously don't have coaches daily.



Not sure that any LTN supporter would be suggesting that coaches should stop and idle - in fact know of many who have spent years discussing/ reporting the foundation schools to their coaches manager to work with them to stop this.

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seems to cut both ways.

>

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I have absolutely no reason to think you?ll

> accept

> > any data that does not show what you want it

> to.

> > You?ve dismissed TfL data, freely available in

> > it?s entirety. You?ve pretty much rubbished all

> > the research on active travel. I could produce

> a

> > glossy pamphlet with ?open everything to cars

> and

> > the air will be clear and traffic a thing of

> the

> > past? if you want 🤷 in fact I think One

> > Dulwich already have some.


I must of missed the research that shows an increase in road capacity reduces the number of car journeys and increases active travel. If you can point me to it, I'll look at it with an open mind.

I see that Lambeth gated communities are now going to have CCTV and policing spent on them to keep the unwashed away from the peaceful q?white areas.....more and more like an American gated community everyday that passes. Rosamund Kissi Debrah must watch on with deep despair.

Out of curiosity - which coach firm?


If it's the same firm that regularly serve Harris Boys on Peckham Rye, it's pointless asking them to switch their engines off - you get ignored at best and told to "f'off back on your bicycle" at worst. And reporting it to the coach firm doesn't make any difference. Believe me I've tried.

heartblock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I see that Lambeth gated communities are now going

> to have CCTV and policing spent on them to keep

> the unwashed away from the peaceful q?white

> areas.....more and more like an American gated

> community everyday that passes. Rosamund Kissi

> Debrah must watch on with deep despair.


That?s funny a ?gated community? is what One Dulwich/DA is pushing for! A permit system where everyone in Dulwich (whatever that means) gets a permit, which would allow the ?washed? to drive in and out of their nice neighbourhood into poorer areas of town. Of course the unwashed won?t be let in as they won?t have a permit.


Where?s the equality in that you ask on behalf Rosemund Kissi Debra?

Still...they should be on Melbourne not ED Grove.


Even when Melbourne wasn't filtered, you wouldn't have got a coach down there. The buses (back in the days when the 37 went along it) could barely make it round the bend. Certainly now it is filtered at the ED station end, if you put a coach in there it wouldn't be able to turn around - putting three coaches down there is not an option.


Second the comment about reporting them. Email to the coach firm with the school and Southwark environment copied in as it's both noise and air pollution. You're right, complaining to the drivers is usually a waste of time.



I see that Lambeth gated communities are now going to have CCTV and policing spent on them to keep the unwashed away from the peaceful q?white areas


Maybe if the anti-LTN'ers would like to stop pouring engine oil into planters, spray painting signs and vandalising cameras, that money could be spent elsewhere?!

https://brixtonblog.com/2021/07/council-to-act-against-ltn-vandals/


Pouring engine oil over plants is just despicable. Honestly, one (heavily anonymised) photo of a Clean Air for All poster next to a massive SUV, the forum goes into meltdown. Repeated vandalism costing tens of thousands to fix and your complaint is that the council are spending money on trying to prevent it?! Not that people are committing criminal damage and (rather ironically) polluting the very streets they seem so keen on "protecting"? I think your ire is aimed at the wrong people...

It?s Rosamund Kissi Debrah, have some respect for a real clean air campaigner and at the very least have a go at getting her name right and I?m not a member of one Dulwich and they don?t speak for me or I for them. CCTV and extra policing for a failed project is ridiculous, especially when told there isn?t enough money for proper air monitoring. LTNs benefit a few, wealthy rich areas, who have a high car ownership and nice bike racks on their SUVs.

Interesting point about coaches. I've seem sitting their idling, for example outside Horniman museum. Asked them to switch their engines off and the driver has ignored me. These are school buses for heavens sake. You save fuel, money and reduce your emissions. I've had the same response from cops sitting their with a takeaway, with the engine running. Sad that small measures like switching your engine off, or smoother use of the accelerator and brake pedals, will reduce emissions yet many couldn't give a monkeys. I've discussed this on the lounge before - difficult to enforce and more needs to be done to encourage. Schools tend to be pretty good at no idling zones.


Not directly relevant to LTNs but very relevant to air quality and climate change.

exdulwicher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Still...they should be on Melbourne not ED Grove.

>

> Even when Melbourne wasn't filtered, you wouldn't

> have got a coach down there. The buses (back in

> the days when the 37 went along it) could barely

> make it round the bend. Certainly now it is

> filtered at the ED station end, if you put a coach

> in there it wouldn't be able to turn around -

> putting three coaches down there is not an

> option.

>

> Second the comment about reporting them. Email to

> the coach firm with the school and Southwark

> environment copied in as it's both noise and air

> pollution. You're right, complaining to the

> drivers is usually a waste of time.

>

>

> I see that Lambeth gated communities are now going

> to have CCTV and policing spent on them to keep

> the unwashed away from the peaceful q?white areas

>

> Maybe if the anti-LTN'ers would like to stop

> pouring engine oil into planters, spray painting

> signs and vandalising cameras, that money could be

> spent elsewhere?!

> https://brixtonblog.com/2021/07/council-to-act-aga

> inst-ltn-vandals/

>

> Pouring engine oil over plants is just despicable.

> Honestly, one (heavily anonymised) photo of a

> Clean Air for All poster next to a massive SUV,

> the forum goes into meltdown. Repeated vandalism

> costing tens of thousands to fix and your

> complaint is that the council are spending money

> on trying to prevent it?! Not that people are

> committing criminal damage and (rather ironically)

> polluting the very streets they seem so keen on

> "protecting"? I think your ire is aimed at the

> wrong people...



Also I would suggest reporting the coach company to the school - they are the ones who pay for their service so the company will probably listen to the school if their contract is at risk because of their behaviour.


I completely agree that damaging anything is utterly abhorrent and such a feeble and weak attempt at protest. But Ex- the lunatic fringe of the pro-lobby has been at it just as much as the lunatic fringe of the anti-lobby - the repeated vandalism of the signs people have put into their gardens and "Love LTN" graffiti all over East Dulwich.


So you can't pin this just on the anti-lobby - there are complete idiots on both sides.


On the subject of the school issue in the area it was interesting how things have gradually got quieter and quieter on the local roads as more and more children have been forced to self-isolate in the latter days of term over the last couple of weeks. I really think the council should have made a concerted effort to work with the schools to help resolve the Dulwich traffic issues before throwing in the roadblocks - it's clear that the coaches are a continuing issue and so are parents doing the school run. Maybe, if the LTNs have to be removed, they will return to addressing the school issue.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...