Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No, "protectionist" means tariffs to protect local industry from foreign competition, the clue is in the name. The aim is to reduce domestic consumption of foreign imports, not to generate revenue.


Translation - to keep prices artificially high


Why do you think CAP had wine lakes and beef mountains?


Anyway, I apologise as this is going over old ground.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How things work today pk might not be how they

> work tomorrow. It?s called change or adaption or

> evolution etc

>

But as we?re here today why not deal with today rather than speculate about some bizarre future where countries don?t have free trade arrangements but don?t have border controls either?

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Err, hello - ?10 Billion hole in annual

> contributions now the U.K. has thrown off the

> shakles


You've exposed your ignorance of what monetary policy is.



keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Translation - to keep prices artificially high

>

> Why do you think CAP had wine lakes and beef

> mountains?


Yes, as I explained that is the mechanism by which protectionism works, but you've exposed your ignorance of the difference between subsidies and tariffs as well as the MacSharry reforms that began in 1992: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Agricultural_Policy#1992

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good point pk. But I?m more interested in the

> pressure Barnier is coming under from EU countries

> seeking to protect their own interests before the

> talks start. His draft negotiating position has

> had to be redrafted several times already.



I'm more interested in how and when Boris and his BS mates are going to own up to all the lies that they've told and the misinformation that they've spread (based on and taking advantage of ignorance) and the fact that they haven't got any credible plan


but in reality, I expect that they won't own up at all and that they'll blame all bad things on the EU being unreasonable


and mugs like you will fall for it

?... You've exposed your ignorance of what monetary policy is...?


I?m sure I?ve got a couple of books by Milton Friedman on my bookshelves somewhere but I confess they must be very dusty now. You might be too young to remember but Friedman was flavour of the month under Margaret Thatcher and her policies devastated industrial Britain and mining communities and could be said to have paved the way for the Brexit result.


Monetarism is about the supply of money. So we?re back to money, money, money as the ABBA hit had it.

?... and mugs like you will fall for it...?


I have to admire your small c conservatism pk - your brave attempts to preserve the (EU) status quo. No adventurer you, boldly prepared to move forward.


Do you have an EU flag on your bedroom wall? And perhaps a picture of Barnier that you light candles before. Do tell.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Monetarism is about the supply of money.


Right, it's about how much money the ECB prints and what interest rates they set. So why do you think that has anything to do with the EU budget?

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?... and mugs like you will fall for it...?

>

> I have to admire your small c conservatism pk -

> your brave attempts to preserve the (EU) status

> quo. No adventurer you, boldly prepared to move

> forward.

>


But the real point is that there?s not been enough preparation (bold or otherwise) about moving forward


Unless you?ve got sight of all the bold preparation that?s taken place that no one else knows about, then I?d say going on an adventure by destroying plan a without knowing what plan b is a stupid and reckless, so I?m happy not to be an adventurer

It?s nothing personal stepdown (or pk)


The issues at hand are the issues that have always been at hand. The EU cannot be seen to give the UK a better deal as a non-member than we would have as a full member - otherwise the EU would collapse with Frexit, nexit, italexit etc but at the same time the EU wants to keep access to our waters and no doubt will request billions for U.K. access to this and that.


In that sense, as Theresa May said, ?nothing has changed?


Let battle commence with the talks

Yep both uk and eu want a good deal


Now. Who holds the balance of power?


There you go. It?s ain?t the uk. It hasn?t got nothing but it?s pissing away any leverage and goodwill by being arrogant hissy babies. Demanding what it already has for nothing.


The uk is the antagonist in all of this. Eu never asked for it. Uk will come out badly because it doesn?t have the heft it thinks it does. And it will lose two nations from its kingdom. And it won?t be the eu fault

Not sure the plans announced by government today are compatible with keano?s desire for no border and it just being an evil eu plan


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/feb/18/uk-to-close-door-to-non-english-speakers-and-unskilled-workers?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not sure the plans announced by government today

> are compatible with keano?s desire for no border

> and it just being an evil eu plan

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/feb/18/uk

> -to-close-door-to-non-english-speakers-and-unskill

> ed-workers?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other


But we are constantly told by the government that there is full employment. So who will do the jobs in hospitality, catering,care?

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sephiroth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Not sure the plans announced by government

> today

> > are compatible with keano?s desire for no

> border

> > and it just being an evil eu plan

> >

> >

> https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/feb/18/uk

>

> >

> -to-close-door-to-non-english-speakers-and-unskill

>

> > ed-workers?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

>

> But we are constantly told by the government that

> there is full employment. So who will do the jobs

> in hospitality, catering,care?


On Sky after asking this question businesses were told they would have to find other ways.


In other words low skilled immigrants are just intrinsically bad - it isn't a job issue.

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Still, I?m here now

> Living in same country as keano and uncleglen

> Only I have more rights and freedoms than they do


Patel has plans for the "economically inactive" - ironically that's going to be lots of the Brexit fanatics I suspect. Pensioners next.


"8 million people between the ages of 16 and 64 were ?economically inactive? and could be given the skills to do jobs in sectors where there were shortages as a result of the new points-based system."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...