Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Effra Wrote:

> Agreed it does not control when an

> > individual country commences its roll out of an

> > approved drug, but that is beside the point.

>

> I thought THAT was the point?


You missed the point i.e. no EU state can start to roll it out UNTIL AFTER the EMA has approved it.


A classic case of centralised bureaucratic control emasculating individual member states.

Effra Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Effra Wrote:

> > Agreed it does not control when an

> > > individual country commences its roll out of

> an

> > > approved drug, but that is beside the point.

> >

> > I thought THAT was the point?

>

> You missed the point i.e. no EU state can start

> to roll it out UNTIL AFTER the EMA has approved

> it.

>

> A classic case of centralised bureaucratic control

> emasculating individual member states.


Strange that this is how the EMA describes itself on its website:


"The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is a decentralised agency of the European Union (EU) responsible for the scientific evaluation, supervision and safety monitoring of medicines in the EU."


Given that the MHRA approved the vaccine under European law, there is nothing to stop other EU countries from approving it either regardless of EMA approval. Emergency legislation allows for it.


So, perhaps you'd like to reconsider your UPPER CASE POINT point?

Effra Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah Blah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> Sorry Blah Blah, but your take on this does not

> meet your usual standards of objectivity.

>

> The UK opted out of the European Medicines Agency

> (EMA) to rid itself of the lethargic bureaucracy

> that pervades the entire EU. The EMA controls the

> development, evaluation, approval of new

> drug/vaccines in the EU. So no approval, no

> rollout. Agreed it does not control when an

> individual country commences its roll out of an

> approved drug, but that is beside the point.

>

> This gave the UK the freedom to analyse the data

> and react quickly without numerous group meetings.

> The EMA plan to have two more meetings in December

> to discuss this. It will be 2021 before they can

> progress towards mass vaccinations.


Except that a) there is an exemption for public health emergencies and b) until the 31st December we?re still bound by EU law. So what legal change has Brexit brought that allows us to deploy the vaccine today in 2020 that we couldn?t have done in 2015?


TopCat?s strained interpretation that we probably would have waited for the rest of the EU doesn?t mean we couldn?t have done it without Brexit, just like we could have had blue passports if we?d wanted but chose not to.

Effra Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "On January 1 2021, Britain will get a dose of

> regulatory independence, and the EU will get a

> dose of regulatory competition"

>

> Credit to Stephen Dnes, DT Letters today


It?s probably more accurate to say that on Jan 1 either


Britain will be under a deal that it?s failed to prepare for (unless it changes nothing of any significance or extends transition) or

Britain will be in a no deal situation that it?s failed to prepare for


Either way Boris is a massive bullsh*ter and has let down all sides

a corollary


Johnson doesn't sign a deal, screws the country and breaks up the Uk - he's toast

or

Johnson signs a pitiful deal (because of his redlines and because of the reality of balance of power) and he is toast as his party turns on him for "giving in"

Yes, Johnson has a difficult month ahead, irregardless of what happens. And as he is talking directly with Ursula Von Der Leyen now, the final decision will be on him personally.


Even on the vaccine front, they are overplaying their hand. The vaccines ordered from Pfizer are a one off order that will be delivered gradually over time. The reality is that we may only see 800,000 shots in the near future, well short of the millions ordered. So this is not a magic bullet by any means. And there are real logistical problems with getting that vaccine out to care homes.

I still think we'll get some sort of half baked deal. It will satisfy exactly nobody. Brexiteers will cry betrayal and stich up, by everyone and anyone and take zero responsibility themselves. It's all very predictable and depressing. Boris will not make it to the next election imo.

Theory one.


If Boris comes back with no deal, he is definitely toast. After 1 month of the chaos that ensues, he will be pushed out, probably to be replaced by Sunak, with whom the EU will reopen negotiations, and a deal will be done.


Theory two.


He settles for a deal and the ERG throw a temper tantrum over the concessions we all know he is going to have to make on fishing etc. He clings on, but for how long?


Theory three.


Everyone wakes up and it is 2010 again. It was all just a terrible dream ;)

And here we have it !

Four years+ in, an oven-ready deal promised a couple of years ago, and we?re here guessing what the Govt is aiming for and what we?ll end-up with - with literally hours to go before discussions end.

Absolutely shameful. And the shape of ?Brexit? seems to be down to personal belief nowadays !

Imagine 5 years ago saying we?re going to split from Europe and Boris Johnson will negotiate the deal.


You?d have laughed in disbelief, specially if you?d have added ?and we?ll be in a pandemic where the virus is trying to kill millions?


But no, here we find ourselves. It?s like being asked if you?d rather be shot or stabbed to death.

A fitting footnote to add to that triptych, would be this eternal tweet written back in Sept 2016, which I presume was a response to Michael Gove's ''The day after we vote to leave, we hold all the cards''...


EU lays down a royal flush.


UK looks at own cards: Mr Bun the Baker, Pikachu, a Shadowmage, a fireball spell, and the Fool

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A fitting footnote to add to that triptych, would

> be this eternal tweet written back in Sept 2016,

> which I presume was a response to Michael Gove's

> ''The day after we vote to leave, we hold all the

> cards''...

>

> EU lays down a royal flush.

>

> UK looks at own cards: Mr Bun the Baker, Pikachu,

> a Shadowmage, a fireball spell, and the Fool



🤣🤣🤣


Hmm, The Fool. About to leap into The Abyss, if memory serves.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...