Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Actually the General Election was akin to a referendum except there were two questions.


Would you like a hard Brexit and not have Corbyn as Prime Minister. A resounding yes. Game over really......


So deal or no deal?? I'm sorry I haven't a clue. I suppose it depends on whether we play our cards right. And we could call my bluff. But get this wrong and we could be losing our family fortunes. You don't have to be a master mind to work out that we are at the tipping point. Although at times it appears pointless. And we are the weakest link.


Ignore this nonsense and views on the first question. The obvious one is that both sides will compromise late on, and claim victory. I reckon with or without Cummings this will have been the case. And Gove will still avoid answering the question.


Until all the nonsense starts at the ports and Irish border. It's a mad mad world.

  • 2 weeks later...

Chickens coming home to roost update:


EoErJE8W8AIu1Mk?format=jpg&name=small


Loving how the Mail is trying to frame this, no doubt aware that some of its middle class readership will be affected.

The rules aren't 'new', they are existing rules that apply to all non-EU countries. This is exactly what was said before the referendum and since, yet English exceptionalism carried on sticking its head in the sand. Wait till they find out about the requirements needed for their precious pooches to travel with them...

DR, you will find the Express has much better headlines. It's pretty barmy but seems to vary from well done Boris for not giving in, to the evil empire that wants to defeat us plucky Brits. Good old fashioned Churchillian.


This is from a limited sample when I am queuing at the self service at Lidl in Sydenham. Not sure where the papers are stacked at the Peckham store.

It also doesn't apply to expats* as it states, instead it's for visitors, holiday makers, and 2nd home owners who's main residence is in the UK. Basically they're griping about not being able to take more than 3 months holiday in a 6 month period, poor wee lambs. Oh, and someone better tell them not to travel if their passport has less than a 6 month expiry date, and to be prepared to wait in those long 'non-EU passport' queues in order to get their passport stamped. Other than that, bon voyage!...


*That'll be immigrants to all of you not blessed to be British

I like to think Reach PLC took too seriously the statement below and made the Express as brexity and crazy as possible.



"the CMA said it believes the merger does not raise competition concerns in any of the issues for which it had been referred, including that the two sides "not close competitors, as they target different demographic groups and differ in content and tone".



https://www.sharecast.com/news/small-caps-news/trinity-mirror-given-ofcom-green-light-for-express-and-star-takeover--3357257.html

For the 'tell me just ONE benefit of Brexit' crowd....


How about approval of a vaccine for Covid probably at least a month before the EU?


Yes the govt have made many many mistakes But perhaps we can be pleased at one decision that they have got right.


I await the retraction of the attacks on govt from the Lib Dems in June when the UK didn't join the EU vaccine programme....https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/10/uk-poised-to-shun-eu-coronavirus-vaccine-scheme#:~:text=The%20UK's%20decision%20not%20to,be%20participating%20in%20the%20scheme.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nothing to do with Brexit...

> https://twitter.com/GeorgePeretzQC/status/13341062

> 85890019330


It comes across as we are just a little bit determined to show we are different - maybe they asked us and Boris put up two fingers.



"Spahn said Germany wanted all European countries to be able to roll out the vaccine at the same time. ?We have member states, including Germany, who could have issued such an emergency authorisation if we?d wanted to,? he said. ?But we decided against this and what we opted for was a common European approach to move forward together.?"


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/02/uk-put-speed-before-public-confidence-in-vaccine-says-eu-agency

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nothing to do with Brexit...

> https://twitter.com/GeorgePeretzQC/status/13341062

> 85890019330


I was waiting for this response. It's 100 percent about brexit. As you state....The mechanism is available through the EMA for any country to do this. But guess what?...none of them have...because no-one wants to do it out of step with the other EU nations, becuase of political pressure within the EU. But...Becuase of the fact that we will be out from the EMA jurisdiction in 1 month, we not subject to that same political pressure, and are willing to utilise this avenue where others are not. So, it's all about brexit.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/did-brexit-lead-to-the-uk-s-vaccine-success-

''Political pressure''


Would that be the same political pressure that meant (off the top of my head):


The UK received a substantial rebate?

The UK didn't have to adopt the Euro?

The UK didn't have to be a part of Schengen?


The EU would prefer a 'vaccine bloc' but it hasn't stopped Hungary from ordering a Russian vaccine...


Under a 2001 directive, member countries may temporarily authorize the distribution of an unauthorized medicinal product "in response to the suspected or confirmed spread of pathogenic agents, toxins, chemical agents or nuclear radiation, any of which could cause harm.

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The tiniest sliver of goodwill, benefit of doubt,

> some scintilla that The Cat knows what they speak

> of

>

> Pooooof....


Probably the most deliciously ironic post of the year.....that's some gong....

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ''Political pressure''

>

> Would that be the same political pressure that

> meant (off the top of my head):

>

> The UK received a substantial rebate?

> The UK didn't have to adopt the Euro?

> The UK didn't have to be a part of Schengen?

>

> The EU would prefer a 'vaccine bloc' but it hasn't

> stopped Hungary from ordering a Russian vaccine...

>

>

> Under a 2001 directive, member countries may

> temporarily authorize the distribution of an

> unauthorized medicinal product "in response to the

> suspected or confirmed spread of pathogenic

> agents, toxins, chemical agents or nuclear

> radiation, any of which could cause harm.


Rule number 1 of being a remainer on the EDF.....never, ever admit there may be the finest thread of truth to anything remotely positive said about brexit....

Boris Johnson not mentioning this so called 'Brexit benefit' at yesterday's early evening presser, says it all really. After all, this is the man who would tubthump and grandstand at every opportunity, witness him wanting to put the Union Jack on AstraZeneca's vaccine phials...

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Rule number 1 of being a remainer on the

> EDF.....never, ever admit there may be the finest

> thread of truth to anything remotely positive said

> about brexit....


Rule number 2...... never ever let a Brexiter get away with mistruths, especially when they double down.


FACT There was no requirement for EU member states to agree a unified moment for rolling out a vaccine. FACT EU member states are free to make that decision for themselves if they want to. FACT Mogg, Dorries and Hancock all lied when they implied that if we had not left the EU we would still be waiting for permission to roll out the vaccine.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Rule number 1 of being a remainer on the

> > EDF.....never, ever admit there may be the

> finest

> > thread of truth to anything remotely positive

> said

> > about brexit....

>

> Rule number 2...... never ever let a Brexiter get

> away with mistruths, especially when they double

> down.

>

> FACT There was no requirement for EU member states

> to agree a unified moment for rolling out a

> vaccine. FACT EU member states are free to make

> that decision for themselves if they want to. FACT

> Mogg, Dorries and Hancock all lied when they

> implied that if we had not left the EU we would

> still be waiting for permission to roll out the

> vaccine.


FACT - I totally agree with your first two FACTS, and (FACT) said as much above. I've never said that brexit makes it legally possible where it wasnt before - quite the opposite inFACT. If you actually read what I've written instead of reacting indignantly to what you ASSUME i mean based on what some politicans have said, you'll see i've talked about Brexit making it politically palatable to make the decision you refer to. Hence Brexit is responsible on that basis - I seriously question whether we would be willing to break with the EMA/EU sychronised approval if there was no Brexit (that is an opinion, rather than a fact, but I think we are all still allowed those, even if they differ from your own)


I guess rule number three is to try and misrepresent and beltittle any views which run counter to your narrative.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Rule number 2...... never ever let a Brexiter get

> away with mistruths, especially when they double

> down.

>

> FACT There was no requirement for EU member states

> to agree a unified moment for rolling out a

> vaccine. FACT EU member states are free to make

> that decision for themselves if they want to. FACT

> Mogg, Dorries and Hancock all lied when they

> implied that if we had not left the EU we would

> still be waiting for permission to roll out the

> vaccine.


Sorry Blah Blah, but your take on this does not meet your usual standards of objectivity.


The UK opted out of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to rid itself of the lethargic bureaucracy that pervades the entire EU. The EMA controls the development, evaluation, approval of new drug/vaccines in the EU. So no approval, no rollout. Agreed it does not control when an individual country commences its roll out of an approved drug, but that is beside the point.


This gave the UK the freedom to analyse the data and react quickly without numerous group meetings. The EMA plan to have two more meetings in December to discuss this. It will be 2021 before they can progress towards mass vaccinations.

Effra Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Agreed it does not control when an

> individual country commences its roll out of an

> approved drug, but that is beside the point.


But is not besides the point. Hungary have already gone ahead and ordered the Russian vaccine. So there is one EU member not waiting for the EMA to decide for them. What Mogg et al were saying in reality, is that if the UK were still part of the EMA, we would be playing ball and waiting for their decision. However, that is not what they implied by their comments. They distinctly gave the impression that membership of the EU would have held up the rollout of a vaccine. This is blatantly not true.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would you like to rephrase this?  Your wording gives the impression that TfL is trying to expel its own employees from the country. TfL has changed nothing. The government visa rules have changed and this affects some TfL staff and their right to work in the UK.  As far as I am aware, TfL and the Mayor are working with the unions to try and keep those affected in their jobs.
    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...