Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looking for advice ... we have the usual deal with our nanny that she chooses two weeks and we choose two weeks, but somehow she ends up with 6-8 weeks!


We have children, so unsurprisingly we take a couple of weeks in the summer and a week or so at Christmas. We may then take another two or three weeks during the year. Our nanny seems to wait until we have booked our holidays until she decides on hers, so if we?ve booked three or four weeks off during the year she?ll choose an additional two so that she ends up with six weeks - or even more. Over Christmas she suggested that even though she?d booked a two week holiday, she thought that as we would be ?off anyway? she could choose a further couple of weeks (which would have taken her leave to 8 weeks in ten months).


I don?t want to be ?that employer? but I do feel slightly taken advantage of. Do other people put in requirements that they need a lot of notice for nanny holiday dates (I?ve currently asked for four weeks? notice) and do you require the holidays to be in one week blocks? Or am I just being a bit unreasonable and I should suck it up?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/248343-nanny-holidays/
Share on other sites

Nannies are entitled to 5.6 weeks of holiday, which can include the bank holidays.

If your contract states you can each choose two weeks then she is completely entitled to choose to take those two weeks when she wants, so long as she gives the required notice.


You wrote in your post that you are choosing 3-4 weeks of holiday per year. Which seems like it?s you going over your contracted holiday allowance? In which case, your nanny shouldn?t be expected to then give up her holiday choice because you have taken more imo.


When you say she chose more over Christmas, do you mean she chose to take more than the two weeks she had previously chosen? Or did she go away while you were also away? I would say, if she is choosing more than two weeks then perhaps you should remind her that contractually she can choose two weeks. If she is going away while you are going away then I?m not sure I see the problem?

I completely agree with the response above although 2 weeks each doesn?t equal 5.6 weeks. I guess if your nanny is allowed to choose 2 weeks paid holiday each year then you are still the one who is choosing 3.6 weeks on her behalf which is more than half. And if you as a family decide to take more than half of your agreed holiday allowance (more than 3.6 weeks p/a) then yes, the nanny should be paid as per usual since it?s your choice to go away and it?s not her fault that you are not around for her to work. It wouldn?t be fair on her otherwise. The only thing I would clarify with the nanny is that she can?t carry over her holiday entitlement to the next tax year and 1 month notice either side is usually standard unless otherwise specified in the contract or if there is an emergency. I don?t see that your nanny is trying to take advantage of the situation by waiting for you to book your holidays first as she might not be fussed about when she takes hers. Plus it?s her right to decide when and how she takes her 2 weeks, it could be a few days here or a week there or 2 weeks at a time as long as she gives you 1 month notice. If you feel you are paying out a lot more holidays than you should be perhaps the solution to this problem would be for you to wait until your nanny gives you a month notice for her holidays and then you can book yours at the same time to avoid having to pay her for extra time off. I think so far you have been a very fair employer which is how nannies expect and should be treated! Lots of families do things this way and they don?t mind doing so because they value their nanny and her commitment plus all the hard work she puts into your children but if you feel it?s not affordable for you anymore then try to schedule your holidays at the same time or go on holiday a bit less and stick with the 5.6 or so weeks. Good luck!
  • 11 months later...

When we had a nanny we used to plan together / in advance, as husband and I get 5 weeks' holiday off each year so when she was off we would need to take our holiday then (whether or not we went away), otherwise we wouldn't have enough leave to cover childcare. That was understood by all parties so even though her contract said a month's notice, we'd all plan together throughout the year so that when she was off (totally her choice when) we would book time off and possibly book a holiday ourselves. We'd also let her know when we were planning to be away the same so she could book a trip if she wanted. This way everything was mutual and we were all equally invested in planning.


It sounds like your interaction with your nanny is lacking in some goodwill on her behalf. No one wants to be 'that employer' but at the same time, if someone is being unreasonable in their dealings with you, I think it's OK to call that out.


I'm not sure how you can force the issue other than saying, that's how you want to manage things moving forwards so you can plan your year, your childcare and how much annual leave you have accordingly. Of course the challenge is that if you want to go away in school holidays and she doesn't then she can still force the issue by choosing holidays in term time, and that can't be solved for.


I don't think you are being unreasonable in wanting to jointly plan better, and no, it's not reasonable for her to book two weeks and then want an extra two on top, that's not fair.

  • 2 weeks later...

Our nanny had the equivalent of 4 weeks holiday in her contract of which she could choose two weeks meaning the other two weeks had to overlap with our holiday plans. We planned together and made sure our holidays fell within the two weeks she selected so that we didn't need to hire emergency cover. Any other holiday we took on top of the 4 weeks (we get 5 weeks off from our own jobs) she was paid for even she didn't have to look after our daughter. She didn't work any bank holidays.


I think that's pretty standard and also fair. Your nanny shouldn't be taking her holiday so it intentionally doesn't overlap with when you are off. However, you should be explicit and proactive about this. Ask when she wants to take her two weeks so you can overlap before booking all of your own annual leave allowance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...