Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh dear.

>

> Don't know where to start with addressing that

> lot, so I'm not even going to try.

>

> Just about every sentence could have a whole

> article written in response.

>

> :(



I know. You just cannot argue with facts.


Foxy

We've had graffiti problems from time to time and the reason why Southwark Council have such a robust policy (and they really do) is because if graffiti isn't cleared up, it encourages others to do it. Mnay youngsters who write graffiti don't see it as anything major (although technically it is criminal damage) and nor are they often the career criminals some would like to think they are. In my neighbourhood we remove graffiti as soon as it appears, either ourselves or have the council do it. Removing graffiti from a car though is a different challenge.


It is fair to say that there is an issue with the way that young repeat offenders are treated especially in respect to more serious crimes like burglary and robbery, where custodial sentences are a lat resort after a long line of repeat offending.

Nununoolio- Southwark used to have a policy about bonfires not being allowed at certain times and they used to send someone out if there was a problem, and they used to have a nice green leaflet in several languages- but the last time I phoned about a problem of bonfires the person on the other end of the phone more or less said they wouldn't do anything and she wasn't aware of the strict policy about bonfires- I just assumed that the same slack attitude now prevails about the grafitti- and given the acceptance of 'some types of grafitti' around the Borough, the post by Fox did not seem beyond the realms of probability to me.

Well funding cuts have had a noticeable impact on some types of 'policing' to be fair. Things like the noise pollution team etc are a result of that and unfortunately we are now in a climate of too many incidents and too few resources to deal with all of them. And do any of us want to pay more tax to make up the shortfall?


So in that climate, any department is going to focus on those incidents that might lead to a successful conclusion. Repeat offences are more likely to have more resources focussed on them (so it's important to still report everything) but we can't expect the council or police etc to solve everything.

The Only thing that Southwark Council are strict on that they actually deal with is Parking Fines.

They Never fail there. 100%


But that makes them Money...


Anything else is not so vigorously dealt with.


That costs them money. Money we all pay in our Council Tax to deal with such problems.


Fox.


Fox.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Only thing that Southwark Council are strict

> on that they actually deal with is Parking Fines.

> They Never fail there. 100%


A quick bit of online research would reveal you are only about 15% right there. Trouble is most people don't put up a fight and just cough up.


As regards the type of person that causes this sort of criminal damage in the East Dulwich and Peckham Rye area, I would say that dope smoking, skateboarding, wannabe gangster/rebellious middle class teenage males would fit the bill in many cases. Time to start looking a lot closer to home I think.

  • 3 weeks later...

Stik had to get permission from Southwark council to paint a wall in Dulwich Park. He got it very quickly and easily. Southwark council obviously draw a distinction between graffiti and street art or murals which they consider Stik's work to be.

A 15 minute film has been made of Stik's work in Dulwich and its link to Dulwich Picture Gallery. It is being shown for the first time upstairs at the EDT on 20 Sept at The Bigger Picture Film Club's September screening. More info here http://www.thebiggerpic.co.uk/

Stik will be there if you want to meet him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No denying that Labour's first year or so has disappointed those of us who wanted major change.  But this demonising of the man is just ridiculous.  There have been some good things, but drowned out by this insentient right wing driven media hatred.  The same right wing media that loves Johnson and FaaReg (I think I've at last hit on getting the pronounciation right). A good example today - John Crace reports: That done [reference to Trump] , Starmer could move on. Britain had offered its full support to the peace process. Had worked tirelessly behind the scenes, with no need of recognition. Because it was our job. Recognising a Palestinian state had allowed other Arab nations to condemn Hamas. And we knew a thing or two about decommissioning weapons from the Good Friday agreement. But it was going to be a long haul. (maybe a rosy look, but nice to see something positive) A positive view on our position in the world and a player on the peace deal (albeit too late for many in Gaza) Here's GB news: Suella Braverman says she is 'ashamed to be British' after Keir Starmer’s 'humiliation on world stage' HTF can Braverman lecture anyone? Mail: Will Keir Starmer EVER recover from his viral humiliation by Trump in front of world? PM's efforts to bask in Gaza peace deal spectacularly backfire And slightly earlier in the Times: Starmer ‘duped voters’ and five more claims in explosive new book.  In this case the left sharpening their knives - perhaps they could go back to Corbyn's time as Labour leader.
    • This is one of the most stupid arguments used by all the far-right war criminal supporters to justify the unjustifiable. I can only advise you to study what defines a genocide, maybe you’ll learn a thing or two. Perhaps, you should also read about the great (Jewish) scholars Omer Bartov and Amos Goldberg who both (among others prominent intellectuals) concluded that Israel was committing a genocide. At least, they can’t be accused of antisemitism, I suppose. 
    • I am a big fan of Blue Brick..possibly my favourite local cafe for lunch..
    • Love Blue Brick and have had some lovely meals there,, never had a problem with service, always so accommodating.. Try and support local business, as much as I can.. on a recent visit, clapped my hands that Gail’s was done.. pity, as staff were great at the start, just went down hill …. Be, nice not to see another eateries..chain..  all for supporting individuals.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...