Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh dear.

>

> Don't know where to start with addressing that

> lot, so I'm not even going to try.

>

> Just about every sentence could have a whole

> article written in response.

>

> :(



I know. You just cannot argue with facts.


Foxy

We've had graffiti problems from time to time and the reason why Southwark Council have such a robust policy (and they really do) is because if graffiti isn't cleared up, it encourages others to do it. Mnay youngsters who write graffiti don't see it as anything major (although technically it is criminal damage) and nor are they often the career criminals some would like to think they are. In my neighbourhood we remove graffiti as soon as it appears, either ourselves or have the council do it. Removing graffiti from a car though is a different challenge.


It is fair to say that there is an issue with the way that young repeat offenders are treated especially in respect to more serious crimes like burglary and robbery, where custodial sentences are a lat resort after a long line of repeat offending.

Nununoolio- Southwark used to have a policy about bonfires not being allowed at certain times and they used to send someone out if there was a problem, and they used to have a nice green leaflet in several languages- but the last time I phoned about a problem of bonfires the person on the other end of the phone more or less said they wouldn't do anything and she wasn't aware of the strict policy about bonfires- I just assumed that the same slack attitude now prevails about the grafitti- and given the acceptance of 'some types of grafitti' around the Borough, the post by Fox did not seem beyond the realms of probability to me.

Well funding cuts have had a noticeable impact on some types of 'policing' to be fair. Things like the noise pollution team etc are a result of that and unfortunately we are now in a climate of too many incidents and too few resources to deal with all of them. And do any of us want to pay more tax to make up the shortfall?


So in that climate, any department is going to focus on those incidents that might lead to a successful conclusion. Repeat offences are more likely to have more resources focussed on them (so it's important to still report everything) but we can't expect the council or police etc to solve everything.

The Only thing that Southwark Council are strict on that they actually deal with is Parking Fines.

They Never fail there. 100%


But that makes them Money...


Anything else is not so vigorously dealt with.


That costs them money. Money we all pay in our Council Tax to deal with such problems.


Fox.


Fox.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Only thing that Southwark Council are strict

> on that they actually deal with is Parking Fines.

> They Never fail there. 100%


A quick bit of online research would reveal you are only about 15% right there. Trouble is most people don't put up a fight and just cough up.


As regards the type of person that causes this sort of criminal damage in the East Dulwich and Peckham Rye area, I would say that dope smoking, skateboarding, wannabe gangster/rebellious middle class teenage males would fit the bill in many cases. Time to start looking a lot closer to home I think.

  • 3 weeks later...

Stik had to get permission from Southwark council to paint a wall in Dulwich Park. He got it very quickly and easily. Southwark council obviously draw a distinction between graffiti and street art or murals which they consider Stik's work to be.

A 15 minute film has been made of Stik's work in Dulwich and its link to Dulwich Picture Gallery. It is being shown for the first time upstairs at the EDT on 20 Sept at The Bigger Picture Film Club's September screening. More info here http://www.thebiggerpic.co.uk/

Stik will be there if you want to meet him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • a (clean) nappy/pamper, it was like it had snowed in the garden.  The absorbent stuff inside spread everywhere.  Can I have my gardening gloves back please.
    • They've left all kinds of things in my garden including gardening gloves and shoes, not to mention scavenged food and packaging. Once they left an unopened vacuum pack of smoked trout, the next day some pita bread. All a bit biblical.
    • From memory foxes only became a regular sight in the 90s, the attached article says they first appeared in the 30s becoming far more common in the 80s.  Apparently, whilst we think that urban foxes live longer than rural due to their 'easy' life few will make it over the age of two.  In towns they are far more crowded than their natural habitat where they are more territorial. I've never seen foxes and cats fighting but once saw two cats squaring up to each other and a watching fox went up and butted its head against one of the cats.  There's a video on youtube of a cat and fox facing off when the cat is eating outside, but it wont let me embed on this post.  Get too close and I'll scratch you. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/15/urban-foxes-are-they-fantastic-or-a-growing-menace My main issue is leaving things out like gardening gloves and they go or are shredded.  One stole a bag of bird food in front of me, took it next door, shredded the bag and then left it.  
    • I was trying to remember when Franklins moved to Lordship Lane from Walworth Road where it was combined with an antique/bric a brac shop. Mid 1990s, first wave ED gentrification?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...