Jump to content

Female participants needed for research at King's College London (?20 reimbursement)


Recommended Posts

We are looking for women aged 18-25 years old who have never been diagnosed with a psychiatric or neurological disorder to take part in a study developing new tasks to assess social-emotional processing.


Study description:

The aim of the research is to develop and test a set of new social-emotional processing tasks. Social-emotional difficulties have been postulated to play a key role in the development and progression of many psychiatric disorders including anorexia nervosa. However, there is a relative paucity of naturalistic paradigms that could be used to assess these difficulties. This study aims to address this gap by developing two new tasks assessing different aspects of social-emotional processing.


What is involved?

The study consists of:

1. A screening phone call, which involves establishing whether you are eligible to take part.

2. One experimental visit, which involves filling in some questionnaires and completing two computerised tasks.


The first computerised task involves watching some brief video clips depicting various social scenarios and then you will be asked to what you think happened in each clip and what you think might happen next. During the second computerised task you will be asked to watch brief video clips depicting various social scenarios and rate how you felt watching each clip. You will be filmed during this task.


How long will the study take to complete?

1.5-2 hours


Where is this study conducted?

103 Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ, UK


What are the incentives?

All participants receive ?20 cash upon completion of the study.


Has the study received ethical approval?

This study has been approved by PNM Research Ethics Subcommittee (ref: HR-19/20-13004)


Who should I contact for further information?

If you have any questions or require more information about this study, please contact Jenni Leppanen ([email protected]), Department of Neuroimaging, King?s College London, 103 Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I tell you what, I've answered every question you've posed to me on this thread so far, so before you deflect any further, why don't you address the simple questions I've put to you several times first. Here, give them a go: Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Do you genuinely believe that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the square due to inadequate signage?  
    • Which original consultation?    Err be careful with the expert opinion and data part.....if you think the cycle lobby and Aldred et al is the sole source of sound opinion on such issues! 😉 And this is where they fell foul of the law and had to re-run the consultation. It actually casts huge doubt on a lot of previous consultations (including the latest DV one) as they do not pass the legal watermark because they do not provide a yes/no response. The council are terrified of a judicial review because, I suspect under legal advice, they know they cheated the system in many previous consultations. Do you remember when the council claimed they had a mandate for the CPZs because of some seriously dodgy research conducted with a large tranche of students in the north of the borough in 2018.....
    • Perhaps the issue is that Southwark don’t listen. They didn’t take account of responses. The proposed CPZs for west Dulwich  stopped when the Council was threatened with a judicial review. Not before. Whatever consultation process was worse than flawed with McAsh arguing that because they were in power, they had a mandate and didn’t need to listen to anyone’s views, rendering any democratic process void. The criteria for LTNs was high population density, high public transport usage and low car ownership so Dulwich Village was a perfect candidate…not. Just a coincidence but I believe some councillors live within the scheme 
    • We’re looking to buy a house in ED (3 Bed, 1,100 sq ft type). Quite a few we’ve found on Landells Road, Pellatt Road and Jennings Road are half houses. Does anyone have a view or any experiences of living/buying a half house?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...