Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is a problem with closing the car parks for the more vulnerable of us out there, particularly if online shopping is going to become more difficult. I'm in the at risk category and am not well enough and live to far from any of the supermarkets to walk and then carry the shopping home. Using public transport is not safe for me so I may have to drive to shop. There are probably many of us in the same situation.

Whilst it may seem like a good idea have you considered how people will get their shopping on buses.


Buses these days just have enough space to get your knees in and no other room.


Most people now have a trolly to shop, get large prams on the bus and that is it. No room. Over crowding and passing on the virus.


It comes down to stop stock piling.

I love seeing people walking back (in this case Savacentre) with massive bags, wheelie thingies and the like. It's a bit sad actually and chances are if they are without a car then they probably need to buy a little more. Hardly filling their car boot, and unlikely to have a garage or shed to hoard. Sorry I've done full circle on this one, teaches me to tar everyone with the same brush. I enjoy shopping at Lidl too, but even there (and with only space for half a dozen cars) the queues put me off today. So no fresh bread/pastries for me today (Lidl have the finest bakery). I gave up the big shop months ago and enjoy (or did enjoy) shopping by bike.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...