Jump to content

Recommendations for personal shoppers


Recommended Posts

Really, those jeans cost over ?1000?

They were hand-made by medically verified virigins from a small tribe on the rocky shores of the Menai Straits, and made from only the finest Egyptian cotton washed in babies' tears, the seams stitched using unicorn mane.

The likes of Cilla Black and Julio Iglesias would never be seen dead in them because they're still alive, though I'm not a hudred percent sure in the case of cilla black......or julio iglesias for that matter.

There's good reason to visit a food store every day, but there's no good reason to visit a menswear department whose clothing line up you consider to be complete and utter rubbish.


Unless you're a mad in the head delusional paranoid who thinks they have relationships with people who don't know them.

Palore, thank you for your suggestion; that sounds perfect. You also win this week's forum prize for actually reading the posts before answering.


I wasn't going to comment on UDT's bizarre posturings - a gentle drawing aside of skirts seemed kinder - but have to say I'm loving the use of 'eta'. I'm going to drop it into a conversation some time today and see what reaction I get. I'm guessing a slight recoil or maybe a smirk.

Sorry, Moos, no reprimand intended! Thanks for your suggestion; just not what I'm after at the mo.


At that moment I was feeling a bit overwhelmed by a combination of UDT's posts and Jeremy sneering at me for finding clothes shopping (actually even the thought of shopping) exhausting and having the temerity to ask for recommendations. Apparently I should have been focusing on providing entertainment.

I can see why anyone would want be waited on hand and foot for no fee. That's a no brainier surely?


I just can't see how the shop chooses who to give it to: they can't give it to everyone, I can't imagine stamping your foot and demanding it being a good reason, I can't imagine that just being tired by shopping is a good reason (isn't everyone?).


The only logical reason would be the Richard Gere / Julia Roberts reason, but if you're not committed to buying anything then why bother?

You know what we're gonna need here? We're going to need a few more people helping us out. I'll tell you why. We are going to be spending an obscene amount of money in here. So we're going to need a lot more help sucking up to us, 'cause that's what we really like.

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, Moos, no reprimand intended! Thanks for

> your suggestion; just not what I'm after at the

> mo.

>

> At that moment I was feeling a bit overwhelmed by

> a combination of UDT's posts and Jeremy sneering

> at me for finding clothes shopping (actually even

> the thought of shopping) exhausting and having the

> temerity to ask for recommendations. Apparently I

> should have been focusing on providing

> entertainment.


None taken, and it's understandable that you might be a bit exasperated by some of the contributions. I personally find the show/hide button useful. Or I used to..

Daresay I'll regret taking you seriously enough to respond again, Huguenot, but I don't see what's so hard to understand. (Unless you're just seeing this as an opportunity to imply a variety of nasty things about me? I don't see why you should but that seems to be what some people come here for.)


Apart from at the top end, the big stores mostly stock the same ranges at the same prices, so it's largely atmosphere, service and overall shopping experience that make you choose one shop over another. Also a way for shops to get people to come in and spend money who would otherwise stay away and make their existing clothes go another year or two, and if they can make it easier for you then you're more likely to go back to them next time, aren't you.

You think I'm having a go at you Ms B? Not at all. I'm just interested that's all.


I can see that for you it make absolute sense. It's the shop I can't understand.


What you say is logical, but it's inefficient. There's a cost on staff, catering and even floor space and overheads.


Debenhams isn't a high margin store, it's low margin mass produced stuff. Unless you spend quite a lot on clothes at one sitting then they'll make a loss on everything they sell you - they might as well not have you as a customer. They'd be better off without you.


The only argument is to run it as a loss leader, but then everyone would want your special treatment and they couldn't provide it. They'd end up pissing off more customers than they won.


Selfridges and Harrods make sense because of the margins and ticket price, but you've already said that you want to save money, not spend it.


It's the first time I've come across the idea that this service is available to low margin high street customers as opposed to Premiership WAGs.


I just don't get it.

Well no, increased market share at a loss isn't worth winning unless there is some other benefit.


That's why I think I've missed something here.


Anyway, I'm watching this thread with an eagle eye, and the second you let us know where you get it I shall be on the case and find out what it's all about!

It's a good bit of PR for the shops - presents a customer-focussed image - and though I've never used one myself, I can see the bonus of using a personal shopper. Shopping *can* be exhausting, especially as most women's clothes are designed for 6 foot 5 skinny boys!!
I find that being over forty with a lack of ability to choose clothes easily from racks, working full time and running a home with four children, the personal shopping experience to be a wonderful self indulgence. I have been several times over the last few years and of course if they find the outfit you like with all necessary lingerie and shoes, wrap, jewellery, or whatever, and sometimes you can't resist, or are even grateful, for the chance to buy more than one outfit because it looks so good, then obviously the service pays for itself, and I would be extremely disappointed if it ever became unavailable, not being very keen on spending the extra time travelling up to London. It amazes me that people spend so much time criticising questions on this forum instead of being helpful!

Highly entertaining thread one way or another.


Ms B, in my well off days, I went once to Harrods and used a girl there. I bought lots of things and took most back the next week. They were highly suspicious and my customer loyalty evaporated!


Friends swear by John Lewis service.

I'm surprised Debs does it for the same reasons Hugeonot explains. IPhone spelling sorry.


I have all the issues you explained in your opening post. I tend to look on the Internet at some length first and then go into town with more of a focus. I also find that you can get things on eg Phase Eight website that are not available otherwise.


El Pibe, your "knowledgeable customer" post was hilarious.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I thought that re ULEZ, but actually other places do have similar schemes, eg Bristol. I got caught by this a couple of years ago when Google maps sent me through Bristol en route to somewhere else. Though I did manage to get the fine waived. And other places are apparently going to have them, eg Oxford. As I found when I was considering selling the car in Oxford. Which I think is a very good thing, but not helpful if your car isn't compliant  Also in order to sell it I would presumably have to get it into working order, so I'd have to buy a new battery anyway. I use mostly buses and trains already, for travelling both within and outside London.  That's why I rarely use the car except for transporting bulky/heavy items, or going to places which aren't easy to reach via public transport, or giving people a lift who are not very mobile. The problem with hiring a car to go to a festival, for example,  is that I'd be paying for it to sit in a field for several days. And it would be impossible, or at least very difficult,  to transport a tent and camping equipment there by public transport. Not that I've been to any festivals lately. I think I'm talking myself into keeping the car. I did do sums when ULEZ came in. I've had a Freedom Pass for over fifteen years, gulp 😂 This is all true, but you have to factor in my age, convenience, and the waste of money in hiring a car if you aren't actually going to use it once you've got to your destination until you need to drive home. If there was a system like zip cars where you could drive somewhere and leave the car for someone else to use, then pick up another car just to drive back, that would be different. And hire charges are greater for older drivers (even though apparently the stats say we are safer) even assuming you can find a company which will hire you a car. Thank you, that's useful. I  keep meaning to  check for ULEZ compliance. A mechanic once told me I should do this, because his son had a similar issue and then found his car was actually compliant, and I never got round to it. It's a Micra so I probably need to contact Nissan (or could a garage check NOx output? Is this part of the MOT?)
    • We used to have local councillors posting on this forum - are there any who are still members?
    • I've never owned a car in the 25 years I've lived in London.  I would regard it as  a hopeless waste of money  I walk, get public transport and taxis for the rare occasions when public transport won't cut it. Anything large that needs to be transporting to or away from my property - well pretty much all shops deliver and for anything  else  there is always someone who willing do it for a small fee. If I need a car to go somewhere outside of London (you would be surprised at how little this issue occurs) then hire cars exist.
    • Hi, we're in a similar position with our old people carrier and did a look back at our usage and then looked at the costs for car clubs, taxis and car hire costs if we got rid of it. In our case the away trips to family, especially during school holidays, makes it cheaper to keep ours and pay ULEZ (the away trips is the big cost for hiring). We rarely use it for local trips and plan usage to aim for multiple purpose trips. We also share with our neighbours such as moving large items with our people carrier and share the ulez cost. Generally for low use alone it will not make financial sense to buy a newer car. Also, if you have a petrol car check its NOx output amount for ULEZ compliance as TFL wrongly categorised many older cars. Did this for neighbours 2001 car and it's ULEZ compliant when TFL originally said it was not (now fixed) and having the same issue with a 1997 petrol car.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...