Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What bugs me about this crisis is that they (the media) are focusing on the death of Eddie Large yet very little about the 560 plus others who died in the past 24 hours.


Each one of their lives was just as important and valuable to their families and friends and I find it sad that a former celebrity gets more media attention than "ordinary" people.


If the media are going to put one death in the spotlight they need to put all those who have lost their fight on the same pedestal.


Rant over

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/251768-covid-deaths/
Share on other sites

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What bugs me about this crisis is that they (the

> media) are focusing on the death of Eddie Large

> yet very little about the 560 plus others who died

> in the past 24 hours.

>

> Each one of their lives was just as important and

> valuable to their families and friends and I find

> it sad that a former celebrity gets more media

> attention than "ordinary" people.

>

> If the media are going to put one death in the

> spotlight they need to put all those who have lost

> their fight on the same pedestal.

>

> Rant over


Around about 500,000 people die in England each year. About 10,000 each week, 1,428 each day.

Are you saying we should name them all.


Eddie Large was a well known TV Star for many years and his passing would of been of interest to many.


DulwichFox

Keano

I'm sure Mrs Bloggs and his 3 children wouldn't agree with you. What makes a has been celeb more important ? Joe could have been about to solve one of life's big mystery for all we know.


Foxy I saying if they are going to highlight one death from covid they should highlight them all or no one at all.


Your concept would have been the same as saying there should be no war Memorial's erected with soldiers names on.


Everyone is supposed to be equal in God's eyes but the media instead wants sensational news to sell.


Either mention them all by name or mention no-one's name to be fair to those who can't even go to the funerals of family members at the moment.

Either you are very bored Spartacus or it genuinely peeves you.


There is nothing stopping you researching the unfortunate people?s names and, with permission from their families/relatives, publishing a list on this forum to give them due recognition, with perhaps a brief biography for each person. In fact, you could update your lists hourly I suspect.


That should keep you occupied and address the perceived wrong that annoys you.

"Celebrity deaths are always reported, irregardless of what they die from. Why would that be any different during a pandemic?"


Exactly, this thread should be re-titled "why do famous people get mentioned in media when they die, but everyone else doesn't ?"

It's nothing to do with Covid, no change, BAU.


A few months ago, the exact same headline would have occurred (obviously except the bit about "succumbed to Covid-19..".

Stupid thread, not on the deaths , but the premise


Following this logic we?d have ?News? on just about anything and anybody


Breaking News: Ted Boark died this week, after he planted a dozen cabbages on his allotment he complained of ?feeling unwell? says Mrs Nora Boark. Ted died shortly after his dinner.


See, it?s not exactly ?newsworthy? is it. It?s unfortunate I grant you, but it?s nothing that Mrs Boark couldn?t inform her nearest and dearest of herself. Whereas, Eddie Large being of national interest in that the was considered ?well known? warrants a ?news? story.


Hence ?Well known comedian Eddie Large died today? on the national news


See how it works?


Next?!

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...