Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What bugs me about this crisis is that they (the media) are focusing on the death of Eddie Large yet very little about the 560 plus others who died in the past 24 hours.


Each one of their lives was just as important and valuable to their families and friends and I find it sad that a former celebrity gets more media attention than "ordinary" people.


If the media are going to put one death in the spotlight they need to put all those who have lost their fight on the same pedestal.


Rant over

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/251768-covid-deaths/
Share on other sites

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What bugs me about this crisis is that they (the

> media) are focusing on the death of Eddie Large

> yet very little about the 560 plus others who died

> in the past 24 hours.

>

> Each one of their lives was just as important and

> valuable to their families and friends and I find

> it sad that a former celebrity gets more media

> attention than "ordinary" people.

>

> If the media are going to put one death in the

> spotlight they need to put all those who have lost

> their fight on the same pedestal.

>

> Rant over


Around about 500,000 people die in England each year. About 10,000 each week, 1,428 each day.

Are you saying we should name them all.


Eddie Large was a well known TV Star for many years and his passing would of been of interest to many.


DulwichFox

Keano

I'm sure Mrs Bloggs and his 3 children wouldn't agree with you. What makes a has been celeb more important ? Joe could have been about to solve one of life's big mystery for all we know.


Foxy I saying if they are going to highlight one death from covid they should highlight them all or no one at all.


Your concept would have been the same as saying there should be no war Memorial's erected with soldiers names on.


Everyone is supposed to be equal in God's eyes but the media instead wants sensational news to sell.


Either mention them all by name or mention no-one's name to be fair to those who can't even go to the funerals of family members at the moment.

Either you are very bored Spartacus or it genuinely peeves you.


There is nothing stopping you researching the unfortunate people?s names and, with permission from their families/relatives, publishing a list on this forum to give them due recognition, with perhaps a brief biography for each person. In fact, you could update your lists hourly I suspect.


That should keep you occupied and address the perceived wrong that annoys you.

"Celebrity deaths are always reported, irregardless of what they die from. Why would that be any different during a pandemic?"


Exactly, this thread should be re-titled "why do famous people get mentioned in media when they die, but everyone else doesn't ?"

It's nothing to do with Covid, no change, BAU.


A few months ago, the exact same headline would have occurred (obviously except the bit about "succumbed to Covid-19..".

Stupid thread, not on the deaths , but the premise


Following this logic we?d have ?News? on just about anything and anybody


Breaking News: Ted Boark died this week, after he planted a dozen cabbages on his allotment he complained of ?feeling unwell? says Mrs Nora Boark. Ted died shortly after his dinner.


See, it?s not exactly ?newsworthy? is it. It?s unfortunate I grant you, but it?s nothing that Mrs Boark couldn?t inform her nearest and dearest of herself. Whereas, Eddie Large being of national interest in that the was considered ?well known? warrants a ?news? story.


Hence ?Well known comedian Eddie Large died today? on the national news


See how it works?


Next?!

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...