Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree with robbie (shock!) that she tried to

> play the race card to quickly, she was chomping at

> the bit to get one over on him. I disagree that

> CBS are part of the fake news brigade.


Oh they definitely are fake news! They got caught red handed last week:


'CBS have been caught broadcasting fake footage where they attempted to ?make things look a little more panicked than they actually were? outside a hospital testing facility'


https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/cbs-caught-broadcasting-fake-news-on-the-coronavirus/video/2aab84253871fedd2bbd88e3b6182755

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It sounds preposterous but during the 1980s there

> was a big satanic cult scare across the world and

> loads of people believed it.

>

> It could easily happen again.



Iron Maiden doing another tour?...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-49795237


Robbie, very interesting interview with President Andry Rajoelina, it eas refreshing to hear him stand up against information given by the Who in regards to the natural remedy. As he says the Who did not ask questions when the frug Mediator (link) was being prescribed for years by French pharmaceutical Servier. I believe the trial was suspended because of covid but I may be wrong. 132million was paid out to patients by this manufacturers. Yet here we have the WHO assuming the right to challenge an natural product which has been used traditionally by the people when they have avoided dealing with atrocities carried out by pharmaceuticals over the years in third world countries. Good for him.


I had to laugh when the ionterviewer asked for the other herbs, oh of course the patent. It would be to hard a concept to understand natural medicine may be more than just about money. Here is a link to natural businesses being bought out.


https://www.businessinsider.com/natural-brands-owned-by-large-corporations-2014-8?r=US&IR=T#hain-celestial-bought-garden-of-eatin-in-1998-2

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Norwegian scientist Birger S?rensen has claimed the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is not natural in origin. The claims by the co-author of the British-Norwegian study?published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics?are supported by the former head of Britain?s MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove.


https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/DBBC0FA6E3763B0067CAAD8F3363E527/S2633289220000083a.pdf/biovacc19_a_candidate_vaccine_for_covid19_sarscov2_developed_from_analysis_of_its_general_method_of_action_for_infectivity.pdf

you look at the link and you see it was done with Professor Angus Dalgleish so you google him and ... it doesn't mean it's wrong so we await the peer reviews.


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/shortcuts/2016/feb/09/ukip-cancer-europe-angus-dalgleish-brexit


and


"Whitehall sources reacted with dismay to Dearlove?s intervention, the latest in a long campaign of briefing aimed at justifying a lab leak theory pushed by the US president, Donald Trump. They reiterated they saw no evidence to justify the claim by the former MI6 boss."


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/04/hackers-targeting-uk-research-labs-amid-vaccine-race-gchq-chief

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you look at the link and you see it was done with

> Professor Angus Dalgleish so you google him and

> ... it doesn't mean it's wrong so we await the

> peer reviews.

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/politics/shortcuts/201

> 6/feb/09/ukip-cancer-europe-angus-dalgleish-brexit

>

>

> and

>

> "Whitehall sources reacted with dismay to

> Dearlove?s intervention, the latest in a long

> campaign of briefing aimed at justifying a lab

> leak theory pushed by the US president, Donald

> Trump. They reiterated they saw no evidence to

> justify the claim by the former MI6 boss."

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/04/ha

> ckers-targeting-uk-research-labs-amid-vaccine-race

> -gchq-chief



I don't think we'll ever know to be honest, unless computers are hacked or communication transcripts and discovered. China claim the US created it and brought it there (which wouldn't surprise be given the Democrats and Deep State record of false flags) and vice versa with the US. If it was manufactured and deliberately released, it could very well spark WW3 so I don't blame most governments in downplaying that theory.

I would dismiss any idea that any lab deliberately released an engineered virus. But something escaping accidentally is not impossible although bats are also studied everywhere in the world because they harbour so many viruses but never get sick from them.


The problem here though is that there are hundreds (if not thousands) of experts analysing this virus around the world and the overwhelming majority of them disagree with Birger S?rensen's conclusions. So who is right? It is hard enough for experts to decide, so the general public have no chance.


I also agree that when you look at the people involved in pushing this claim, that there seems to be an effort to lay blame so that reparations can be claimed. My instinct says that politically, this is going to get very nasty over the next few years, whatever the truth may be.

seenbeen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It seems the USA have been analysing satellite

> images of hospital attendances in Wuhan and

> Internet searches of corona symptoms

> https://uk.yahoo.com/news/satellite-images-packed-

> wuhan-hospitals-160744017.html


food for thought here- might explain why a lot of people think they already had it at the back end of last year!

Almost certainly they did. We now know there is an incubation period of 7-14 days in most people. And when doctors first started noticing something in Wuhan, they were silenced by local authorities. I think the virus could have been establishing itself for 8-10 weeks before Beijing took it seriously. So plenty of times for it to start spreading around the globe. It is highly likely that when Europe and the USA were finding their first confirmed cases, that the virus was already spreading way beyond what governments thought they were dealing with at that time.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation helped negotiate who would score a $100 million government-backed contact tracing contract in August 2019 ? six months before the ?pandemic? arrived in the United States and four months before it swept through China.


The shocking revelations were unveiled on the Thomas Paine Podcast and the Moore Paine Show on Patreon by the two investigators who blew the whistle on the massive Clinton Foundation tax fraud during a Congressional hearing in 2018. John Moynihan and Larry Doyle testified in Congress, detailing the fraud and schemes utilised by the Clinton?s to avoid paying up to $2.5 BILLION in federal taxes.


The investigative duo, in their first interview since that bombshell Congressional testimony, revealed to Paine that representatives from the Gates Foundation met with U.S. Congressman Bobby L. Rush at a sit down in Rwanda, East Africa in mid August 2019 to hash out who would score the windfall from a government contact tracing program. And just last month ? nine months after the meetings with the Gates Foundation in Rwanda ? Rush, a Democrat from Illinois, introduced the $100 BILLION H.R. 6666, the COVID-19 Testing, Reaching and Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act.


https://truepundit.com/exclusive-bill-gates-negotiated-100-billion-contact-tracing-deal-with-democratic-congressman-sponsor-of-bill-six-months-before-coronavirus-pandemic/

Robbie, just stop it please. There is no conspiracy around Covid. Virologists who are constantly researching viral mutation in all kinds of zoonotic forms have been warning of the increasing risk of a pandemic for a long time. This is nothing new. Nor does it have anything to do with politicians or billionaires. Next you will be arguing that QAnon has merit, when in reality it is a conspiracy theory dreamed up by poorly educated Trump supporting wierdos who think Soros is the bogeyman.


As for the claim that Covid was created in a lab....here is the truth, from bona fide peer reviewed and corroborated science.


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jun/09/conspiracies-covid-19-lab-false-pandemic?CMP=share_btn_fb&fbclid=IwAR1lrdFeekMQaUSmvdMHqv6jjSsPoc3L_Y9-WT7BYymIoNbGA1h8_v-Uyp4

I've only known about QAnon for a couple of months so the jury is still out for me.


But without a shadow of a doubt there is some merit behind it, demonstrated by the recent confirmation in the case of General Flynn that the whole Trump-Russia collusion narrative was false, brought about by the declassification of documents which QAnon mentioned over the past couple of years. The insight into such classified documents suggests to me that this is very much an inside job, and not your usual theory. With more declassification on the way, as well as 33 subpoenas issued last week to members of Obama's administration and FBI, it will be interesting to see what develops. Not to mention whether any mainstream media outlets will finally decide to give such a scandal the coverage it deserves.


There's also the news from the past day or so, the Black Lives Matter movement being a fundraising front for the Democrat party. FYI I'm a 40 year old black man before you start thinking about coming at me from that angle.

QAnon is a made up conspiracy theory and anyone with half a measure of intelligence can see that right away. Your ethnicity has nothing to do with anything in your post. So why you feel the need to state it in some bizarre defence of a conspiracy fantasy you are flirting with is baffling. Fundraising for political parties is not illegal. All parties take donations. Political activism similarly will align itself with one party or another. Why? Because lobbying that party through government is the only way to influence change. This is as true for Republicans as it is for Democrats. Are the NRA and KKK a front for the Republicans? By your logic, they must be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.”
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...