Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Despite the click bait headline.....I'd like to avoid all the colourful partisan and non-partisan judgements of his character and capabilities (or lack thereof, depending on your viewpoint).


No...what I mean is...since he got out of hospital..by my count he's made 3 or 4 public appearances (not counting PMQ's)....and 2 of them were pre-recorded. I may have missed one, but you get the gist. He's totally invisible. And even if you don't like anything the man does or says, it seems highly out of character for him not to be seeking more of the limelight. His PMQ performances have been shoddy at best...it cant ALL be down to starmer (despite him coming across very well).. Boris just looks shockingly poorly prepared (again, many will write that off as 'just boris', but there must be more to it). I'm also hearing from people who might have a clue, that he's really not right and struggling.


Were he not the prime minister, and were we not experiencing an unprecedented crisis, I've no doubt he would have spent quite a lot longer recuperating than he did.


Any thoughts on wether he's operating at 100 percent? (And yes, I know that '100 percent of boris' is still well short of many people's expectations of our PM)......

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/252723-is-boris-fit-to-lead/
Share on other sites

Listen to the dreadful at present James O'brien who hasn't got a good word to say about Boris and slates him at every opportunity, but never comes up with solutions. James O'B was never as bad as this, but the last six months he's been hideous to listen to spouting his champagne socialism.

Not fit to lead, IMO wasn't fit to lead before Covid anyway.

Bojo's last 'appearance' in the HoC was silly from what I heard on radio, Kier Starmer asking an obvious question about care home protections based on a select committee yesterday where unfortunate truths were aired, BoJo answering a completely different question that was not asked (three times !) and floundering badly while doing so. I can't say that was due to his being not fully recovered from Covid, I don't actually care, he was to me obviously playing with different articulations to play-down a very serious point from Labour.


dbboy - I think JoB is genuinely aghast that a person such as BoJo can actually become leader in this country, that so many lies can be told around Brexit with no comeback, that blatant lies can be told during conferences to the public/media with no accountability and he invites callers to air their concerns - some whom agree with JoB, some who don't. Let's be frank, it's hard to find positives with the Govt, it's leadership, Brexit dealings and handling of Covid19. Isn't it ?

Boris has a track record of being poor on detail, so he finds any scenario where his is not controlling the narrative difficult. He will never be a match for Starmer at PMQ's for example because of that. The reason why a British woman is languishing in a prison term in Iran is also because he can not grasp details.


He is invisible for the same reason any leader is invisible, because he is a liability who is prone to making stuff up on the hoof. He was no more visible before he got ill btw.


Fundamentally, Boris is lazy, has never worked full time at anything and has winged it for most of his life. I personally thinks he finds the reality of being PM challenging and that is worrying because it invariably leads to an over reliance on advisors and ministers. Fine if you are surrounded by genuine talent. Bad if you are surrounded by mediocrity and narcissism.

He's clearly struggling post infection but ''Where's Boris'' was a thing well before the crisis when he buggered off on holiday and also missed 5 consecutive Cobra meetings in the build-up to the crisis. His PMQ performances have always been just that, performances, except he hasn't got the braying support of his public school entourage behind him. He also can't handle someone like Starmer who deals in detail and asks pertinent questions rather than the edited viral soundbites Corbyn would go for. Johnson has never liked scrutiny either, witness his refusal to be interviewed by Andrew Neil. He's been found out to be the poundshop Churchill he is...

dbboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Listen to the dreadful at present James O'brien

> who hasn't got a good word to say about Boris and

> slates him at every opportunity, but never comes

> up with solutions. James O'B was never as bad as

> this, but the last six months he's been hideous to

> listen to spouting his champagne socialism.


Don't listen to him then. There isn't a good word to say about Johnson... but many to describe him and his cabal about their incompetent handling of this virus.

The guy should just step-down, now is a good time - he could explain it's due to recent illness and needing time with new child.

He's guaranteed to be Lord Johnson now, so what else to do ?

He's loaded (his family is loaded) so surely he's done it all now, try and do something useful with his life like bring up the kid.

But that wouldn't suffice for this egotistical oaf.

dbboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Listen to the dreadful at present James O'brien

> who hasn't got a good word to say about Boris and

> slates him at every opportunity, but never comes

> up with solutions. James O'B was never as bad as

> this, but the last six months he's been hideous to

> listen to spouting his champagne socialism.

I'm not surprised at James O'Brien- he's like that all the time. I complained to LBC about a downright lie he told last year and haven't listened since.



Boris was out jogging today apparently so he must be on the mend and I imagine he is being overseen by a doctor. Is he on paternity leave I wonder- he is entitled just like anyone else?

After all, Boris and the Cabinet are being led by the science and the statistics so he doesn't have to show himself everyday. It is a good thing that we hear what the relevant Secretary of State has to say about their own areas.


The pandemic is what it is a PANdemic.....all the problems the world has have stemmed from the fact that the WHO would not cease movement of people out of China by plane and so it was spread around the world and by International Law there was nothing anyone could do about it.


Covid was reported to the WHO on 31st December when 41 patients were sick in Wuhan province- all from the wet market....and it was reported as respiratory disease that was not responding to conventional treatment.


China locked down INTERNAL travel at the end of January but pushed on, with the support of the WHO , foreign travel until the end of March.Remember there are International laws around Travel restrictions.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_in_January_2020

Makes interesting reading.


Given that there had already been a SARS outbreak in 2002 the WHO were remiss and we have ALL suffered and it is NOT the Government's fault in any way shape or form imvho.


Remember dbboy there are people who will oppose the Tories WHATEVER they do....on principle- I've heard them say as much and I've also heard a lot of people saying thank goodness Corbyn wasn't in charge....

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sadly don't need to be a good leader to be

> popular.... That said I'm wondering if we have

> had a good leader, well at least in most of our

> lifetimes. That's opened the door to many other

> discussions (sorry)


All I can say is look at Trump.

Look, I'm not a flag waver by any means, but I tire of the constant negativity surrounding the handling of the pandemic, and before you jump on me, I totally agree that 35,000+ deaths is inexcusable, unacceptable and tragic, one death was one too many from the virus. So far that's 35,000+ funerals, that's 35,000+ too many.


Clearly two weeks before the pandemic was officially recognised, the risks should have been highlighted, all UK borders should have been closed, if you wanted to leave the UK, fine, but no return or other entry should have been allowed till the pandemic has cleared.


So yes, I agree errors have happened, but it is not all down to one person.

dbboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Look, I'm not a flag waver by any means, but I

> tire of the constant negativity surrounding the

> handling of the pandemic, and before you jump on

> me, I totally agree that 35,000+ deaths is

> inexcusable, unacceptable and tragic, one death

> was one too many from the virus. So far that's

> 35,000+ funerals, that's 35,000+ too many.

>

> Clearly two weeks before the pandemic was

> officially recognised, the risks should have been

> highlighted, all UK borders should have been

> closed, if you wanted to leave the UK, fine, but

> no return or other entry should have been allowed

> till the pandemic has cleared.

>

> So yes, I agree errors have happened, but it is

> not all down to one person.


Yeah but he fronts it

Ultimately BoJo makes final decision on direction, if that's based on advice it doesn't excuse him if he cocks it up. He's the man, he chose/sacked according to who will toe his line.

The converse would be to say he's PM, but he follows advice from his team so if it goes wrong they are at fault not him - so he's squeaky clean always. Don't think so !

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not fit to lead, IMO wasn't fit to lead before

> Covid anyway.

> Bojo's last 'appearance' in the HoC was silly from

> what I heard on radio, Kier Starmer asking an

> obvious question about care home protections based

> on a select committee yesterday where unfortunate

> truths were aired, BoJo answering a completely

> different question that was not asked (three times

> !) and floundering badly while doing so. I can't

> say that was due to his being not fully recovered

> from Covid, I don't actually care, he was to me

> obviously playing with different articulations to

> play-down a very serious point from Labour.

>

> dbboy - I think JoB is genuinely aghast that a

> person such as BoJo can actually become leader in

> this country, that so many lies can be told around

> Brexit with no comeback, that blatant lies can be

> told during conferences to the public/media with

> no accountability and he invites callers to air

> their concerns - some whom agree with JoB, some

> who don't. Let's be frank, it's hard to find

> positives with the Govt, it's leadership, Brexit

> dealings and handling of Covid19. Isn't it ?


Agree 100% I wish he'd fess up that he's made a bloody mess of this whole thing and step down-he has the blood of 1000's on his greasy little paws.

Anyway the above just building my case that if Boris is an idiot he's surrounded by idiots (and I haven't mentioned Patel who has disappeared).


If you're an idiot and surround yourself with clever people you can step back and be a figurehead leader (which many say Boris did as London Mayor)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As it turned out after my post, the police have photos. And even if they didn't, the OP reported the incident to the police, who would have asked for a description.  However there are all sorts of problems with eye witness descriptions, which would just be multiplied with several kids involved. I stand by my post. Are you suggesting a full description of these kids should be posted on here so that ... what?  Vigilante action by forum members? And if there was mistaken identity? Then what? Even if there wasn't, there could be all sorts of background issues relating to this sort of anti social behaviour. It should be left to the police to find and  appropriately deal with  the perpetrators of criminal behaviour. The police are far from perfect, but the alternative just makes a general slide into lawlessness more likely.
    • Hi there, we’re on Rodwell Road and need some large + medium moving boxes - please message if you’re trying to get rid of some, we can collect. 
    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...