Jump to content

Is Boris fit to lead?


TheCat

Recommended Posts

For me it's the lack of recognition from the Gov that they've made mistakes, spinning yesterday's U-turn on the NHS surcharge as a sign of Johnson's 'strength', being typical.

This from former diplomat Peter Ricketts...


The Government would win so much respect if they admitted, just sometimes, that they had made a mistake and were correcting it. That would be a sign of strength not weakness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For me it's the lack of recognition from the Gov

> that they've made mistakes, spinning yesterday's

> U-turn on the NHS surcharge as a sign of Johnson's

> 'strength', being typical.

> This from former diplomat Peter Ricketts...

>

> The Government would win so much respect if they

> admitted, just sometimes, that they had made a

> mistake and were correcting it. That would be a

> sign of strength not weakness.



100percent agreed. Good article in the spectator last week which outlined the three big mistake that have been made. And suggested it they were just admitted, rather than obfuscated, it would go a long way to buying cred.


Can't understand why they can't admit missteps. Everyone knows it's difficult...but don't piss on us and tell us it's raining.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For me it's the lack of recognition from the Gov

> that they've made mistakes, spinning yesterday's

> U-turn on the NHS surcharge as a sign of Johnson's

> 'strength', being typical.

> This from former diplomat Peter Ricketts...

>

> The Government would win so much respect if they

> admitted, just sometimes, that they had made a

> mistake and were correcting it. That would be a

> sign of strength not weakness.


If corbyn had removed the surcharge it would be evidence of awesome he is.


Now that Boris has...it's a U-turn, or he's been 'forced" into it.....


Government has done something that the left wants, and the left still find a way to have a go...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> If corbyn had removed the surcharge it would be

> evidence of awesome he is.

>

> Now that Boris has...it's a U-turn, or he's been

> 'forced" into it.....

>

> Government has done something that the left wants,

> and the left still find a way to have a go...



You don?t think that saying one thing one day and the opposite the next is a U

Turn?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eminent epidemiologist made to jump before he was pushed because press wanted some salacious gossip.


Scottish public servant does the right thing after not following her own public guidance and quits.


I don't care is Cummings jumps or is pushed, one or the other is right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > For me it's the lack of recognition from the

> Gov

> > that they've made mistakes, spinning

> yesterday's

> > U-turn on the NHS surcharge as a sign of

> Johnson's

> > 'strength', being typical.

> > This from former diplomat Peter Ricketts...

> >

> > The Government would win so much respect if

> they

> > admitted, just sometimes, that they had made a

> > mistake and were correcting it. That would be a

> > sign of strength not weakness.

>

> If corbyn had removed the surcharge it would be

> evidence of awesome he is.

>

> Now that Boris has...it's a U-turn, or he's been

> 'forced" into it.....

>

> Government has done something that the left wants,

> and the left still find a way to have a go...


That's the culture of British politics

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cummings has to resign, but he won't.


I don't think Johnson et al would let him resign even in the unlikely event he offered to, because they are complicit in that they knew what he had done, yet at the same time they kept telling the rest of us to do the opposite. It's also a big gamble by ministers to publicly back Cummings today, because if there's more to come out in the following days it would bring the Gov down...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guardian getting the correct question that the political correspondents seem unable to ask


"Among them, why is Cummings being excused for reportedly breaching lockdown rules due to needing help with childcare, when for the last nine weeks parents up and down the country have struggled without help while they suffered symptoms because they didn?t feel they could seek or accept help because it was against the rules? And if it was indeed fine all along, why wasn?t clear guidance on this subject given to the broader population?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what's it to you where he is or what he's doing, he's possibly still recovering, enjoying being a father supporting his partner, oh and don't forget it's a bank holiday weekend, so maybe he's at Chequers this weekend. Is that OK with you??
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need for him to resign- 24th March from newschain.co.uk

'However, Dr Jenny Harries said at the daily Downing Street press briefing on March 24 that a small child could be considered ?vulnerable?.


?Clearly if you have adults who are unable to look after a small child, that is an exceptional circumstance,? she said.



?And if the individuals do not have access to care support ? formal care support ? or to family, they will be able to work through their local authority hubs.?'


I'm sure Boris will appear to talk to us about something soon. This is like when he didn't visit flood areas...the people who lived there didn't care as he is not an expert on floods

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a brother in law in London - support was available much closer to home. Rumours of a death in the family in Durham too. Finally his wife wrote a piece in the Spectator about what they dd when they suffered from COVID-19 - but nothing about Durham mentioned - why ?


Shapps didn't seem to be able to answer much - a lot of "I don't know" and tried hopefully to talk about an upgrade to the A66 or some such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ha ha, some people really don't like an opinion that differs to theirs do they! Bravo One Dulwich - you're magnificently rattling the cages of people who don't want to hear a differing opinion and the fact they get so irate about it is the icing on the cake! Some spend so much emotional energy trying to convince themselves One Dulwich is some shadowy, agitator state-funded lobby group when all they are is a group of local residents giving a voice to the majority of residents impacted by the measures.
    • @Earl, Be assured, it is purely a local group. In fact it is a genteel group of Dulwich area residents, mostly ladies , who are a little  reluctant to publish their individual names as they do not wish to be targets for hostility from internet trolls. Local residents who attended the anti-LTN gatherings in Dulwich would have easily recognised the active members of the group. Should you have any queries about funding, it is quite easy to send them an email.
    • Hi  I have a spare old wheelbarrow that you could have for free. You’d need to come and collect it from Telegraph Hill, so drop me a message if you’re still looking and we can arrange a time best wishes carrie
    • This is quite a serious allegation. What evidence is there of this? Pressured how and by whom? This is quite a spin on ‘it’s been agreed with the emergency services’. They think the vehicles pictured driving through with partially covered plates are the result of ‘poor signage’ 🤔  If it is as they say ‘small numbers’ driving through the square, that doesn’t suggest that the signage is unclear. I mean who honestly believes it’s possible to drive through there without noticing the signs / planters (assuming you’re driving with due care and attention)?! 🤨  Also, haven’t ‘One’ opposed any improvements to the layout / landscaping and signage proposed by Southwark? It’s all a bit desperate. At the height of the LTN ‘controversy’ a number of co-ordinated ‘One’ groups popped up across London. It doesn’t feel like a local grassroots movement, but has all the hallmarks of astroturfing. The lack of transparency about it’s funding / sponsorship and structure does not help with this impression. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...