Jump to content

Is there going to be any decent competition for the Hoopers Pub Quiz tonight?

nutty

By nutty
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

nutty

nutty

Posted
  • Author
Posted

No word from Jamma - does that mean no win?????


Okay - we're next out on 8th May - would prefer Hoopers but willing to go to any quiz that has good competition. There have been plenty of people on this thread who seem to think they are up to the challenge but we've yet to go head to head yet.


Any teams up for that date? Hoopers or elsewhere?

Jamma

Jamma

Posted
Posted

Bah, babysitter let us down last minute so didn't make the quiz which well pissed me off.

Not sure what date we'll be back in action, possibly the Clockhouse on Tues. But nutty choose your venue well, we will destroy any challengers at the Hoopers quiz absolutely guaranteed.

Jamma

Jamma

Posted
Posted

Oh Mr(s) Nutty, you are soon to feel the force of a fully operational quiz machine.

And once we are finished with you we shan't return to Hoopers we'll move on and you'll keep going there and you'll win again but you'll always know that any future wins just don't really count because somewhere out there is a crack quiz team who could crush you on a whim.

Jamma

Jamma

Posted
Posted

The 'mystery' year round, question one - In what year was 1984? FFS.

Connections round, question one - What connects people who have names that are types of birds? Jeeesus.

International pub quiz convention dictates that 6 is the maximum permissable number of members in a quiz team. And bussing in folk from far away is frowned upon.

We clearly misfired (that was our worst result in any quiz ever) due to the fact we hadn't been together for about six months and we had to field one substitute. The inquest has begun and we shall regain our previous invincibility. So you won on your home turf (which was shit), bring it to The Plough next week and let's see how you fare.

mockney piers

mockney piers

Posted
Posted

"In what year was 1984?"


Should that read "..written?" otherwise the answer is probably 1984.


Mind yuo, this is from the quiz that insisted the Israelites ate a poisoned apple on the trek to the promised land.

nutty

nutty

Posted
  • Author
Posted

hmmmm - it would have been much easy to slate a quiz for being for dumbasses had you actually won. I don't think you even made it into the top two and kept quiet about who you were.


Admittedly it was fairly childish of us to name our team "Not Jamma" but the purile pleasure of hearing Jamie finish the evening with...


"..and the winners are 'Not Jamma'"


..was too good to pass up - if a little presumptious of us when naming our team at the start.


Okay - when is the plough one - I'll try and raise the troops. I doubt there will be as many of us next time, a couple of extras just came along for a drink, the core team of four or so holds the brainpower.


Don't get the comment about "bussing in folk from far away is frowned upon"?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • mccatonline
      Cleaner available

      By mccatonline · Posted

      A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • vladi
      Is Peter Mandelson toast

      By vladi · Posted

      I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • ArchieCarlos
      Planning application - new Underhill Rd residential development

      By ArchieCarlos · Posted

      Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • Spartacus
      Is Peter Mandelson toast

      By Spartacus · Posted

      I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...