Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Most pundits seem to think McCain is practically a shoo-in for the republican nomination.

The other one seems too close to call. The momentum seems to be with Obabma, who seems to me a more decent politician, and the Kennedy endorsement must have helped. But it can all look oh so very different after super tuesday.

Was it the BBC bloke who suggested Obama may have flown too close to the sun?


In summary...breezes.

MP, interesting twist in the story how Obama and Hillary are now friends.....what a dream ticket that would be!!! How could the country resist having such a politically acceptable pres and vice pres.......I wonder if the deep south could live with it??

Ha ha, they could always secede...on second thoughts.


I don't believe for a second they're friends, I think the democrats weighed in and told them they could be risking both tickets by running personal/dirty campaigns.


A bit like how I hoped the brown blair factions would sink their party, but nooo Gordon came out all lovey dovey and rescued the election. Errr, or something

 

For anyone to have made it into the senators office there has been some serious politicking going on. Noone gets that far by being earnest.


That said, it may (or may not) be possible to do good things once you've done it; think Carcetti.

LBJ really wanted to be the next FDR, but ended up the next Harry Truman and it basically killed him.

Obama's no angel, but in terms of the lesser of evils, I'd like him to win it, I think he could bring some positivity to a really rather f****d country.

I'm not sure he could be tough enough when called on.....shame Rudy dropped out. I would like to see a woman in the White House.....especially one who has been around the block a few times, and has the inside experience of having almost been there and done it. She was usually the voice in Bill's head for most of that time.
Tough is necessary when pushed into a corner, or willing to take a stand on something....Tony Blair was not tough enough....a good diplomat, wise and intelligent, but not a tough leader. All of those qualities are necessary.....Bush is tough but stupid....very deadly combination.

I don't think there is any other option than to go Democrat. The tide was turning during Dubya's re-election but hadn't turned enough (arguably it had turned enough but the result didn't mirror that) For me it doesn't matter which democrat is elected but who they surround themselves with. HC will surround herself with the same people Billy boy did whereas Bazzer Obama, with limited history + favours oved etc, will be able to take more of an objective view and hopefully surround himself with a genuinelly centre left group of advisors. With zero foreign policy experience he is still in a better position to soften America's approach.


Bet he gets in and makes an Axis of evil speech within 2 months.

Hmm.

The mark of a leader is surely making good decisions. Including the decision not to do anything, a highly highly under-rated skill imho.

That decision may be easy, it may be a real bitch.


In bush's case I'm not even convinced he was that tough. It's easy to make a hard decision when you're stupid. If he'd have shown real resilience it would have been in thinking for himself and NOT following the cynical agenda of his advisors.

Likewise standing in rubble isn't tough, it's expedient. He was quick to stand in new york rubble, slooooow to stand in New Orleans rubble because it served him no purpose. Invading a country you've reduced to a third world status definitely isn't tough, that's just bullying, and as we all know bullies aren't tough, they're scared.


As for Blair, I'm inclined to agree with you, he baulked at a lot of decisions and he never dared take on Brown; but then I don't think he ever really knew what he was doing full stop frankly.

He was good with the speeches, he was good with the press, he could charm the voters, but apart from hand-waving desires for reform/change/progress/other synonyms to do with making stuff different than it was in 1997 (apparently), he hadn't the foggiest what or where that change/progress should go.

More handwaving, education, nhs, third way [pause...look profound, furrow brow furrow brow]. Competition, choice, accountability (unless your bribing arabs/party funders) [breathe deeply, act statesmanlike]


etc etc, you get my point....I'll shut up before I actually start winding myself up.


As for diplomacy I draw attention to this independent cover...that's not senisble diplomacy, and it sure as hell ain't the classic british 'balance-of-power' strategy.

 

Anyhow, sorry, there I go guns blazing again.


I entirely agree with your sentiment Paragon. I remember how depressing it was when Bush won a second term. I got about 20 emails from American friends apologising for their nation in the days that followed, but never underestimate the ability of the US electorate to vote for the god fearing warmonger. Religion has a great deal to answer for....err...no offence ;-P

Americans hate the war and are much worse off economically since the Republicans took over. That's all that matters right now. Bill delivered the goods, and putting Hillary in the White House will put Bill back there as well.


I think, as Paragon says, there is no other option.


MP Bush went into Iraq to finish a job his father started and failed.....and his advisers were dreamers.

Don't bank on a Republican backlash electing a Democrat president. McCain is vehmently anti-war and has the added benefit(?) of being a 'Nam veteran. The worse the war gets, the bigger an issue it becomes. This will play well for McCain. He's not tainted with the Bush regime and appeals to conservative Democrats. He'd be the dangerous candidate.


On a lighter note, classic footage of why American citizens should never be allowed to vote...




Be afraid, be very afraid.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Our car was stolen from in front of our house on Scutari Rd, SE22 last night. Black S Max If anyone sees it around please get in touch. I'm currently on phone to police and insurers. Mark - 07793591921
    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...