Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all,


My lodger has been staying with his girlfriend in North London since before lockdown. However he has just messaged me to say that he would like to come back and stay chez moi at some point this week. His belongings are here, and I haven't charged any rent in this period.


Anyway, I am not sure from the regulations if he is even allowed to do this. Can anyone advise, or point me in the direction of someone who can advise?


all the best

Since you cannot make him homeless during covid (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/complete-ban-on-evictions-and-additional-protection-for-renters) I think his position with you does not fall into the ban on 'overnight stays'. The fact that you have not charged him rent (good on you) does not obviate his contract with you.


I think you could require him not to use any 'common parts' (other than the entrance) he has with you for a period - perhaps 7 days - when he has come back to protect you from infection (I am assuming that you are not an at risk or shielded person).


This may be one for citizen's advice, but clearly his is an unusual circumstance for which general 'rules' cannot apply.

Those are reasonable points, and we are supposed to be fighting the virus with "solid British common sense". But I think your first expectation should be for him to stay where he has been, unless there's a good reason otherwise. How practical is it to avoid sharing common parts? Maybe NHS 111 or whatever it is?

ok then no one broke any regulations then - but it's his main home so it would not come under the "overnight ban"


Also, you can if you wanted to, and hopefully not, evict him as lodgers do not fall under the protection granted by government regulations in halting evictions for 3 months due to the pandemic.


if you were to evict him you would just have to abide by the contract you have with him - written notice. As he is an excluded occupier you wont need to go to court.


short answer is that there is no regulation preventing him from coming back and it should be between you two to find an agreement on what is most sensible.


hope that helps

Hi Wee Quinnie,


You don't say whether he is planning to come back to stay permanently or whether he just wants to stay a night or two and if so, why.


As far as the rules are concerned:

If permanently I think it is fine. He's essentially returning home rather than staying away. Moving house is also allowed http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/350/regulation/6/made (6L) and students are allowed to return to the family home for the duration of lockdown.


If just for a night or two it's different and really depends why he wants / needs to do this. I think there would need to be a very good reason.


How you feel about it is a different matter & I guess that depends on your own risk factors.


I think it would be fair enough to ask him to take extra precautions for a period of time before returning (median incubation period is 5 days but it can be up to 14).


Once he is back you might want to keep 2 metres apart for another period &/or ask him to do some extra cleaning. More info here https://www.germdefence.org/index.html


But that is very much down to your personal feeling.

i do not think you have understood the spirit or intent. that is for people staying over away from the main home.

even though he has been away from his home for a period - agreed by LL - his main home is still that. returning to your home is not part of the overnight regulation. might be wrong - but it would go against housing laws and regulations.


if he comes and goes, again when he goes away from his home then he is in theory breaking regulations, not when he comes back. but again how this is enforced, who knows...


it's about the relationship between you and the lodger, legally the only thing you can do is evict him by giving him valid notice, but hope it does not come down to that.


Hope you find an agreement anyway

I think much will depend on your own personal feelings and aversion to risk. If you think the risk of him having it is low, welcome him back - if you're worried, tell him no or tell him if he does he needs to self isolate.


He hasn't been part of your household during lockdown and given people are being discouraged from being in anyone's house (the advice on BBQs is to stay outside and only use the toilet and then return outside immediately) you would be perfectly right to say you don't feel comfortable with it.


It's the same approach to second homes where people are being encouraged to stay put and not travel back and forward to a second home.


It is a difficult one as it is his main home but what was the reason he stayed in North London - everyone knew we were heading into lock down so it couldn't have come as much of a surprise - let's be honest it wouldn't have been difficult to get back? It wasn't like he was stuck on the other side of the world.


Is there any background as to why he wants to come back now - did he fall out with his girlfriend or will he be going back and forward to hers over the coming days and weeks? ;-)

Rockets - am waiting for him to ring me for a chat - all will be revealed.

I have mixed feelings - I am very nervous about the whole virus thing, and am unsure to what extent he will be willing to meet my requests, but I will put all of this to him in advance. He is a lovely guy, but is one of these people who wanders around in a bit of a dreamworld, so I am anxious about him forgetting to wash his hands, also there is no way to be sure to what extent he will be social distancing outside my house...

If i had to guess, i reckon he thinks he will be able to stay over at the gfs a coupla times a week. I am guessing on all of this though. God, I hate being the one who has to crack down!!


BTW- thanks everyone who has contributed to the thread.

There are so many imponderables here and many questions related to potential risk e.g.


Would he be going out to work every day with the potential to become infected? This could be an issue if he is a bit dreamy and forgets to observe guidance.


If not going out to work, is he likely to self isolate in his room for 7 -10 days?


Difficult to gauge but is he likely to go back to his lady friend?


Just a thought but she may have CV19and he is escaping before he gets it too.

Just to update you all, Mr WQ spoke to the lodger. He didnt ask about the gf situation, but explained that ws are still strictly observing lockdown, not going out, no visitors, etc etc,and in coming back he would have to observe same, in order to minimise risk for all of us. Lodger then said, "So effectively i would be in strict lockdown with u? *Pause* I will get back to u in a coupla weeks...but i will look for other accomodation... "


Reading between the lines, i think our views on lockdown adherence do not coincide.Fair enough, when i was his age i wouldnt have wanted this situation either"

At least you know where you stand now, and have so far maintained safety/know that you'll be able to continue to do so.

Perhaps not surprising that he expected to be able to come / go whenever. People do seem to park the need for maintaining measures when it doesn't align with their social or other preferences !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...