Jump to content

Would you shoot a burglar


computedshorty

Recommended Posts

Again, I'm assuming we are delving back into that film again, or else I've not got a clue.


I really must get around to watching it.


Or the forum might tip me over the edge and be responsible for me going on a rampage and you wouldn't want that on your collective consciousness now, would you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not fleeing the country - returning. Not quite ready to flee yet.


Astana to Manchester yesterday, Manchester to London today (with hangover).


Having now watched the trailer - thanks, Mick Mac - I shall have to get a copy in this weekend to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm bored of you all now.


People who harp on about wanting to shoot intruders tend to be demented types hoping to get away with murder, whereas normal people, even staring death in the face in war tend to shoot to miss rather than kill your fellow man.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.L.A._Marshall#World_War_II_combat_historian


So which are you people, spineless bravado or psycopath?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And there you go - beautiful compartmentilism.


If you wish to own a gun = psychopath.


Bugger the idea that you might be good at clay shooting and win the odd event. That you might enjoy shooting.


And so that is why I "choose" to own a gun. Because I enjoy it, and happen to be fairly handy with it.


It's kept in a wall, and floor drill mounted, hardended safe. Ammunition is kept in a seperate internal safe.


The mechanics do not kill people.


As said before, if someone invaded - I would, without question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fact, there is a beatitful simplicity of law -: don't invade, don't get shot.


Plus, I would suppose that none of you have the means anyway. I.E. - guns in the house. If we were an armed society such as the Swiss then this would be a better question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • DulvilleRes...is this correct - did the Chair make that threat?
    • I had one delivered off the back of this thread and would say that, while it's marginally better than the likes of Dominoes and Papa Johns and better value, it's very much in the vein of that sort of pizza. Dough seemed like it had been bought in and is definitely not of the sourdough variety. The sauce was very sweet and overall the flavour wasn't amazing. Not terrible but not a patch on the likes of Yard Sale or more authentic independent pizzerias.
    • The trustees of Dulwich Society reported a huge surge in membership in the weeks leading up to the Special General Meeting. Who these new members were, it is hard to say. However, if the influx was in support of the group of Dulwich Society members looking to extend their influence via the SGM, it failed; they were comprehensively outvoted. Whether co incidental or not, there is a heavy overlap of names between this minority grouping within the Society, and local activists in anti LTN issues. Were they One Dulwich? With an organisation as opaque and unaccountable as One Dulwich are – in stark contrast to the Dulwich Society – it is hard to say. it constantly surprises me that One Dulwich's cheerleaders on this forum seem to know nothing about how they are run, or crucially who funds them. It is hard to take these cheerleaders seriously when they seem unable or unwilling to ask or answer basic questions such as this. I found it extraordinary that this grouping in Dulwich Society pushing for change refused to meet with the trustees to discuss their concerns, opting instead for an expensive Special General Meeting; this indicates to me a certain kind of needlessly combative approach to what is fundamentally an apolitical local charity. This perception was reinforced by the conduct of some supporters of this grouping in the room – hectoring, aggressive and ultimately unneighbourly, and certainly a hostility you wouldn’t want to tolerate in any organisation.  Whilst I can’t talk for the trustees, as regards resigning, if they took the view that actually something extraordinary was happening to much loved local institution that was best dealt with by the Charity Commission, I wouldn’t blame them.  But the end result was in my view a triumph for local democracy. The modernising of the Society’s rules that the trustees supported, giving the possibility of a degree of protection from online trolling for volunteers working on traffic issues, and making the Dulwich Society more inclusive by having the possibility of online General meetings are most welcome.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...