Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I watched a programme yesterday evening called the lockup on BBC 3, its about a Humberside Police custody suite for those that haven't seen or are not aware of it.


One the cases highlighted the situation of a self employed guy who caught a man trying to break into his van with a crowbar to steal his work tools. The van owner took the thief on and in doing so managed to take the crowbar from the thief and in fight that ensued the van owner walloped the thief with his own crowbar, in what he said was self defence. When the case went to court, the would be thief, who it turned out had a string of convictions for burglary and violent disorder, chose not to give evidence. Case was then dismissed againt the van owner. I couldn't help but feel huge delight for the man who did what he thought was right by protecting what he had worked so hard for. In his shoes I would have done exactly the same. And I know some posters will be thinking that the van owner should have called the police WITHOUT approaching the would be thief, but he probably thought it was worth making a stand, as I do.

> When the case went to court, the would be thief, who it turned out had a string of convictions

> for burglary and violent disorder, chose not to give evidence.

> Case was then dismissed againt the van owner.


I'm not sure we were told it actually reached court.


> In his shoes I would have done exactly the same.


We don't know exactly how he acted. We were given some partial indication of the injuries, which received hospital treatment, and told of the GBH charge.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > When the case went to court, the would be thief,

> who it turned out had a string of convictions

> > for burglary and violent disorder, chose not to

> give evidence.

> > Case was then dismissed againt the van owner.

>

> I'm not sure we were told it actually reached

> court.

>

> > In his shoes I would have done exactly the

> same.

>

> We don't know exactly how he acted. We were given

> some partial indication of the injuries, which

> received hospital treatment, and told of the GBH

> charge.


Whats your point?

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To willingly sink to equal terms with

> inferiors...

>

> 'Let me explain in simple terms you'll

> understand...'. The only problem is when these

> inferiors get so uppity regarding your generosity

> ;-)


Yes, but I don't really mind.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not they've gone. Everything has been ripped out. No sign of anyone new yet. 
    • The frequency of fireworks seems to be increasing. If revellers selected the low noise variety that would help, but the trend seems to be the louder the better. I do not think sensitivity to stimuli is the same as timidity. Unexpected, extremely loud bangs and unusual noises will startle most of us. Humans, unlike other animals, have the luxury of knowing what fireworks are and what the noise represents. Some animals do learn to cope but many do not. It could be their hearing is not as sensitive. We should not forget that many animals, including cats and dogs have hearing that is much more developed than ours.
    • ... when animal welfare wasn't quite so well advanced
    • People have been setting off fireworks in London since the 1400s!!!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...