Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I understand your point: if all schools were non-faith, eveyone would have equal chances of getting into every school. The religious criteria of faith schools means that usually a religious family has a better chance of getting into more of the local schools, which might seem unfair. However, in practice, I don't believe this has a huge impact as faith schools are over-subscribed. Pupils who otherwise would be going to non-faith schools, through the provision of faith schools, get concentrated into a school that better serves their families? needs. I can?t really seem the harm. For me, it would only be a problem if the school had empty places causing shortages in the broader system or if lots of non-religious children were being forced to get a faith based education against their parents? wishes because there wasn?t enough genuine demand to fill the schools. The fact that faith schools are often the most over-subscribed means that there is genuine demand for religious education (even if people are faking faith because they simply prefer the discipline / results faith schools tend to provide).
Hi LondonMix - I think where we mainly differ, then, is in our opionion on whether there should be a perogative of the religious to have an increased chance of attending a school which better meets their desires at the expense of the non-religious having an increased chance of being sent to a school that's both further away and less likely to meet THEIR desires (because if it's not filled in the first round, it will usually be undersubscribed because it's unpopular). I think this perogative should not exist, but guess you would argue that the advantage for the religious justifies the consequences? (though don't want to put words in your mouth!)
Hmm, I didn?t really think about it that way. I?m not really sure how it harms non-religious families directly (I?m not religious by the way!). If there is a shortage of local places, there would be a shortage of local places regardless of the existence of faith schools as all the religious families would still be part of the application process. Being sent miles away is more an issue of there not being enough places period rather than an issue created by faith schools. The quality (or lack thereof) of certain non-faith state primaries again isn?t directly caused by there being a faith school. Some might even argue that your local faith school is high achieving because of the discipline etc associated with religious education. It wouldn?t be my preference for my child to go to a faith school but clearly there is demand so I can?t see the justification for getting rid of them. I can understand that living close to a state school might put certain parents within a bit of a black-hole regarding school places but if you put down your six closest which should all be a reasonable distance from your home, I think the council will make sure you get a place in one through the creation of a bulge class, no? Kids get shipped miles away from what I understand most often because their parents didn?t list at least 6 places for whatever reason. I recognize that most people don?t find all 6 of their closest primaries acceptable and that?s really the point. The quality of state school provision needs to continue to improve more uniformly so that everyone one doesn?t keep trying to pile into the same 2 or 3.

Hi LondonMix - re. the LA ensuring you get a place in one of your nearest 6 if you put them all down: no, this doesn't happen, sadly.


During the first round of allocations, each school sees in isolation ever applicantion made to it through the central system. They then use their own admissions criteria to determine who they'll offer a place to. They feed this back to the council and the council allocates the school which is highest on the applicant's list and which has made an offer to the applicant.


So, at this point in the system, religious families are more likely to have met the selection criteria of a larger number of schools and to be offered a place. If the 6 schools you have applied to are oversubscribed (as many are), and you are not offered a place at one of them during this first sift, you are offered a place at one of the undersubscribed schools in the borough. So non-religious parents who put down their 6 most local state schools are less likely to be offered at place at one of these 6 if any of the schools are faith schools.


(As I understand it, the creation of buldge classes is not related to that particular year's demand - it's a more long term strategy, and doesn't react post-application to numbers of applicants in an area that particular year.)


My issue here is that, given the way the allocation system works, non-religious families are actively penalised. You and I are less likely to get our child into a local state school than an equivalent non-religious family, and more likely to be offered an undersubscribed, 'undesirable' school, which is further away. (Whether faith schools should be state-funded at all is of course a whole additional matter!)

Yes, I agree with you there. They do get better odds as I misunderstood how the bulges worked. In past, Renata has said if you've put down your closest six, it was unlikely you wouldn't be offered at least one of them but I suppose that's no guarantee. However, I don't see the point really of getting rid of faith schools just for that reason. I'd rather lobby for more schools to be built to directly address the real issue.

Really interesting discussion about the use of faith in schools. I take the point that in circumstances where the best school in a local area is a faith school, then those families of the relevent faith will apply to that School and have an advantage. However, might it not also be the case that a family might choose as their first choice a school which is not considered the best in the area, but because it is a faith school i.e. that the family chooses a faith School almost regardless of standard, rather than a good/outstanding school and are assisted by their faith.


I accept that this adds nothing to the argument over how faith schools should be funded.

  • 4 months later...
I live next to the temple grove site, which is supposed to be being rebuilt so the temple grove kids, temporarily housed on Habdersashers main site, can move back in September, presumably freeing space at habdersashers for the free school. I haven't seen even a hint of work at the temple grove site (which was burnt down a couple of years ago). So yes, they have a LOT of work to do by September!

Greenwater. All going ahead apparently. I think there's some reason why they don't get final sign off from DoE until late on but they have been approved so they are 100% confident it'll go ahead.

As monniemae says, there have been delays at the temple grove site (something to do with insurance companies) so the current temple grove school* will still be on the Haberdashers site come September, and the free school will be in temporary classrooms on the other side of the site (where they're going to build proper new school in due course).


*I think the new free school will be temple grove, with the current temple grove school getting a different name. No idea why, seems very confusing to me.

Ah. The way it was explained to us is, our local site is Hatcham Temple Grove and teh free school is Hatcham Temple Grove Free School. njc97, where did you get the info on the extra year's delay? The most recent info we got was via a leaflet trhough the door last autumn saying work was finally about to begin on rebuilding the site so the kids would be in by sept 2013, freeing the temp site for the free school while the new free school building is constructed. Would love some up to date info!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • With fibre you are paying for the speed, which is the number, yours is 300 so if you did a lot of gaming, for example, you would want the fastest possible.  If it's just office work or maybe streaming on Netflix you likely won't need as fast, but, if there are a lot of people in your house all doing their own thing on different devices, then faster speeds are better.  I don't rely on my Wi-Fi much other than when I am using my mobile.  I use Ethernet cables to connect up everything, I Have one cable running from my router, along the skirtings and through a hole I drilled in the wall to another room.  I have attached the plusnet speed guide which gives you an idea of how it works.   
    • I'd reread what you posted and try to summarise.  It just comes across as a rant.
    • Just shows, to me, once proud to be a citizen of UK.. now.. well if we pay/contribute to services - nhs, police, fire etc and folk who have made this there home - no matter what creed or culture.. for the love c of God, can someone  please explain to me.. how we have working royals who like them or not, have tried and continue to actually support and make a change and then we have Andrew.. who just destroys everything.. not just him, or royalty but his own children..  I had great admiration for The Queen - and respect.. as have a huge number of people.. but.. these old traditions where gosh.. live rent free and can’t get chucked out until I believe 2070? From what I scanned..well he has and continues to have it all.. has to go thru what old rules? Etc.  doubt very much he has even kept the upkeep maintenance up on his abode.. and do the shite keeps on pulling up.. What has Andrew done for UK or for that matter since he was 20?? Do please tell me       Totally off topic, before anyone jumps down my throat.. I just do not get how anyone is proud to be British at this point in time. Whoever is in power, seems to be able to help themselves to the public purse with no redress at all - Covid is a great example of lining of pockets.. Millions  given to Rowanda, so one is led to believe, to help with refugee problem and one can’t get a plane load off!  I simply do not get it at all. Use of food banks in UK growing yearly, homeless as well, nhs, police, fire service etc all on their knees..        
    • Have applied the green roof at a number of properties and no issues you are concerned about detected. Have issues with cats defecating in the vicinity, however, they are not selecting the green roof specifically. Use decent compost, slow release fertiliser specific for green roofs, and lay it methodically not leaving blank patches. It looks amazing when cared for and adds value.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...